Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:5
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5
članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2014, vol. 62, br. 3, str. 74-86
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
objavljeno: 20/05/2015
doi: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1403074S
The significance of judicial review of sub-national constitutions and laws in federal states
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresa: stankovicm@ius.bg.ac.rs

Projekat

Projekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu: Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija s pravom Evropske unije - pravni, ekonomski, politički i sociološki aspekti

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
This article discusses various issues that emerge as a consequence of constitutional pluralism existing in federal states. Particular attention is dedicated to the relationship between constitutions of federal units and federal constitutions and laws. As a consequence of two coexisting legal systems in a federation, there are as many as six categories of general acts - a constitution, laws and bylaws of the federation, on the one hand, and constitutions, laws and bylaws of federal units, on the other. It is necessary that so many categories of legal acts are in harmony with each other, and this can be ensured only by means of judicial (constitutional) review. Two of the globally most recognized and most representative models of conformity control among different categories of legislative acts - German and American - have been presented. Finally, an attempt has been made to emphasize the importance of such control and the challenges that it may face in the future.

Ključne reči

judicial review; federal constitution; sub-national constitution; constitutionality and legality; federal law

Reference

Brewer-Carias, A. (1989) Judicial review in comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press / CUP
Bridel, M. (1965) Precis de droit constitutionnel et public suisse. Lausanne
Cappelletti, M. (1989) The judicial process in comparative perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, str. 138-142
Corwin, E.S. (1914) Marbury v. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review, 12(7): 538
Corwin, E.S. (1932) Judicial Review. u: Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (vol. 8), London, 457
Currie, D.P. (1994) The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago
Čavoški, K. (1982) Ustavnost i federalizam - sudska kontrola ustavnosti u anglosaksonskim federalnim državama. Beograd: Savremena administracija
Delperee, F. (2000) Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique. Bruxelles - Paris
Đorđević, J.S. (1985) Politički sistem. Beograd: Savremena administracija
Fridrih, K.J. (2005) Konstitucionalna demokratija. Podgorica: CID
Jaffe, L.L. (1958) The Right to Judicial Review II. Harvard Law Review, 71(5): 769
Jovičić, M. (1973) Savremeni federalizam - uporednopravna studija. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo, 119-121
Jovičić, M. (1977) O ustavu - teorijsko-komparativna studija. Belgrade, 243-245
Lukić, R.D. (1966) O hijerarhiji pravnih normi. Belgrade, Advisory report Division of Normative Function between Authorities of Various Political and Territorial Units, 12
Mcwhinney, E. (1986) Supreme courts and judicial law-making. Constitutional Tribunals and Constitutional Review, 14, str. 263
Mezzetti, L. (1997) Savezni ustavni sud Nemačke. Pravni život, vol. 46, br. 11, str. 901-906
Paulson, S.L. (2003) Constitutional Review in the United States and Austria: Notes on the Beginnings. Ratio Juris, 16(2): 223-239
Rogowski, R. (2002) Thomas Gawron, Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U. S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court. New York - Oxford, 62
Slavnić, Lj. (2000) Federalizam i ustavno sudska funkcija - slučaj Jugoslavije. Beograd
Stefanović, J. (1965) Ustavno pravo Jugoslavije i komparativno pravo. Zagreb, I, 537
Zurn, C.F. (2007) Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review. Cambridge