Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:21
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:14
članak: 1 od 1  
Vojnotehnički glasnik
2018, vol. 66, br. 2, str. 380-398
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
doi:10.5937/vojtehg66-15850

Creative Commons License 4.0
Arhitektura organizacije kao pristup za razvoj informacionih sistema
aCollege of Information Technology, Belgrade
bInstitute of Public Health, Belgrade

e-adresa: milosav.majstorovic@its.edu.rs, rajko.terzic@gmail

Sažetak

Veza između poslovanja i informacione tehnologije (IT) više od 30 godina stalna je tema, kako u akademskim, tako i u industrijskim krugovima. Poravnanje (usaglašenost) poslovanja i IT-a generalno se vidi kao važna komponenta i osnova za optimizaciju poslovnih performansi bilo koje organizacije. S obzirom na stalne promene, kako u IT svetu, tako i u savremenom poslovanju, rad na poravnanju poslovanja i IT sve više dobija na značaju. Uzrok problema poravnanja je, pre svega, u različitim nivoima apstrakcija poslovanja i IT koncepata. Radi rešavanja ovog problema već duže vreme je aktuelan pristup razvoju informacionih sistema (IS), zasnovan na tzv. arhitekturi organizacije (AO). U radu je prezentovan pregled literature koja se bavi AO, a fokus je na identifikaciji radova koji se bave motivacionim aspektima za korišćenje AO, kao i onima koji detaljnije obrađuju proces razvoja AO uz korišćenje opštih i domenski specifičnih okvira. Pri tome, cilj je da se prikažu trenutna akademska istraživanja iz ove oblasti i korišćenja AO radi rešavanja problema poravnanja poslovanja i IT. Ovaj pregled može biti startna tačka učesnicima u razvoju AO, uz korišćenje postojećih okvira, kao i za razvoj posebnih okvira koji bi se primenjivali u specifičnim domenima.

Ključne reči

poravnanje poslovanja i IT; informacioni sistemi; arhitektura organizacije; okviri za razvoj AO; TOGAF

Reference

Novododat članak: provera, normiranje i linkovanje referenci u toku.
Cameron, H.B., and McMillan, E. 2013. Analyzing the Current Trends in Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 9(1), pp.60-71.
Cvetković, R., Krstajić, D., and Majstorović, M. 2013. Problem poravnanja IT-a I poslovanja kod osiguravajućih kompanija. In: Festival informatičkih dostignuća - INFOFEST, 2013-09-29, Budva/Miločer, pp.189-196 (in Serbian).
Cvetković, R., Majstorović, M., and Krstajić, D. 2016. Sveobuhvatnom specifikacijom ka boljem poravnanju IT i poslovanja osiguravajuće kompanije. In: Regionalna naučno stručna konferencija “INFOFEST PULSE”, 2016-09-25, Budva, pp.138-145 (in Serbian).
Fatolahi, A., and Shams, F. 2006. An investigation into applying UML to the Zachman framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), pp.133-143. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7977-8.
Gartner Inc. 2005. Gartner Enterprise Architecture Process: Evolution 2005.Stamford: Gartner Inc.
Gregor, S., Hart, D., and Martin, N. 2007. Enterprise architectures: Enablers of business strategy and IS/IT alignment in government. Information Technology and People, 20(2), pp.96-120. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09593840710758031.
Gregory, A.M. 2005. The Business Information Revolution: Making the Case for ACORD Standards. New York: ACORD.
Holmes, P. 2002. An Introduction to Boundaryless Information Flow. [ebook]. San Francisco: Open Group. Available at: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007679899/toc.pdf. Accessed: 12.10.2015.
IEEE Computer Society. 2000. 1471-2000 - IEEE Recommended Practice for Architecture description of Software-Intensive Systems. [e-book]. New York: IEEE. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.91944.
ITpreneurs. 2013. Architecting the Family: TOGAF and Major IT Frameworks. [e-book]. Rotterdam: ITpreneurs. Available at: http://mailing.itpreneurs.com/Newsflash/TOGAF/Whitepaper-Architecture-with-TOGAF.pdf. Accessed: 05.12.2016.
Jones, D.F., Schmitz, D., France, N., and Orlandi, M. 2010. The ACORD Capability Model. [e-book]. ACORD Corporation. Available at: file:///C:/Users/Intel/Downloads/yHQOSJ9UQUqUWEfU683qgA.pdf. Accessed: 10.11. 2017.
Kappelman, L.A., and Zachman, J.A. 2013. The Enterprise and Its Architecture: Ontology and Challenges. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), pp.87-95. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645654.
Krstajić, D., Cvetković, R., and Majstorović, M. 2014. Towards the alignment of business and IT in insurance company. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(3), pp.1-7. Available at: http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0314.php?rp=P272363.
Lankhorst, M. 2013. Enterprise Architecture at Work, 3rd ed. [e-book]. Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29651-2.
Majstorovi ć, M. 2016. Business and IT alignment. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 64(2), pp.496-512. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9263.
Majstorović, M., Regodić, D., and Grubor, G. 2016a. Metamodel of a Service-Oriented Business. In: Sinteza 2016: International Scientific Conference on ICT and E-Business Related Research, 2016-04-22, Belgrade, pp.36-43. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15308/Sinteza-2016-36-43.
Majstorović, M., Regodić, D., Majstorović, G., Krstajić, D., and Cvetković, R. 2016b. Sinergija arhitekture organizacije i upravljanja poslovnim procesima. In: YUINFO, 2016-02-28, Kopaonik, pp.58-63 (in Serbian).
Minoli, D. 2008. Enterprise architecture A to Z: Frameworks, business process modeling, SOA, and infrastructure technology. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. ISBN 9780849385179.
ObjectWatch Inc. 2007. A Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise-Architecture Methodologies. Houston, Texas: Object Watch Inc.
Seppänen, V. Interconnections and differences between EA and SOA in government ICT development. [Internet]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228820389_Interconnections_and_Differences_between_EA_and_SOA_in_Government_ICT_development. Accessed: 05.06.2017.
Solomon, E., and Blevins, T.J. 2003. Boundaryless Information Flow Reference Architecture. [e-book]. San Francisco: The Open Group. Available at: http://www.opengroup.org/cio/ReferenceArc-Final1.pdf. Accessed: 02.10.2015.
State of Utah. 2007. EA Framework Research and Analysis. Salt Lake City: State of Utah Department of Technology Services.
The Open Group. 2011. TOGAF® Version 9.1, Document Number: G116. [e-book]. Available at: https://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf91/downloads.htm. Accessed: 05.11.2016.
The Open Group. TOGAF® - the Enterprise Architecture standard used by the world’s leading organizations to improve business efficiency. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/ Accessed: 15.11.2016.
TM Forum. The Information Framework (SID). [Internet]. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/information-framework-sid/. Accessed: 15.10.2016.
TM Forum. The Application Framework (TAM). [Internet]. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/application-framework/. Accessed: 10.10.2016.
TM Forum. The Business Process Framework (eTOM). [Internet]. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/business-process-framework/. Accessed: 02.10.2016.
Urbaczewski, L., and Mrdalj, S. 2006. A Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Issues in Information Systems, 7(2), pp.18-23.
U.S. Department of Defense. 1994. Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management (TAFIM), 1(8), Version 2.0. Reston, VA: DISA Center for Architecture.
Zachman, J.A. 1987. A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), pp.276-292. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276.