Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [4]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
2010, vol. 44, br. 4, str. 485-502
Kontrola kvaliteta kvalitativnih istraživanja
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Srbija

e-adresasdjuric@eunet.rs
Sažetak
Snaženjem primene kvalitativnog istraživačkog pristupa pojačava se potreba za razvijanjem formalnih standarda procene kvalitativnih istraživanja, čime se unapređuje njihova verodostojnost. Nakon pregleda najznačajnijih metodoloških stanovišta o mogućnostima uspostavljanja kontrole kvaliteta kvalitativnih istraživanja, u radu se sumiraju principi dobre prakse u nekoliko oblasti: kontroli kvaliteta nacrta istraživanja, konceptualizaciji istraživačkog pitanja i stvaranje teorijskog okvira istraživanja, kontroli kvaliteta prikupljanja podataka, adekvatnosti uzorka, kontroli kvaliteta analize podataka, kao i izveštaj o istraživanju. Proceni kvaliteta podležu sve istraživačke faze, primenjene procedure i posebni istraživački postupci. Preduslov validne procene jeste dovoljna dokumentovanost primenjene istraživačke procedure, koju će istraživač ponuditi u adekvatnom formatu izveštaja. Sve faze istraživanja moraju biti otvorene za javnu procenu, a metodološka procedura opisana jasno i sa dovoljno detalja.
Reference
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., Oost, H. (2008) Auditing Quality of Research in Social Sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42(2): 257-274
Ambert, A., Adler, P.A., Adler, P., Detzner, D.F. (1995) Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4): 879
Anfara, V.A., Brown, K.M., Mangione, T.L. (2002) Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38
Barbour, R.S. (2001) Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 322(7294): 1115-7
Barbour, R.S., Barbour, M. (2003) Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2): 179-186
Bergman, M.M., Coxon, A.P.M. (2005) The quality in qualitative methods. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6 (2): članak br. 34 www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/457/975 9. 5. 2009
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., Robson, K. (2001) Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Cresswell, J. (2002) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall
Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L. (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3): 124-130
Cutcliffe, J.R., Mckenna, H.P. (1999) Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2): 374-380
Davies, D., Dodd, J. (2002) Qualitative Research and the Question of Rigor. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2): 279-289
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y.S., ur. (1994) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications
Denzin, N.K. (2008) Evolution of qualitative research. u: Given L.M. [ur.] The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, str. 311-318
Đurić, S. (2007) Fokus-grupni intervju. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Eisenhart, M.A., Howe, K.R. (1992) Validity in qualitative research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., Davidson, L. (2002) Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6): 717-732
Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. (1981) Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. (1982) Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30 (4), str. 233-252
Hammersley, M. (1992) What's wrong with ethnography: Methodological explorations. London: Routledge
Holloway, I. (1997) Basic concept for qualitative research. Oxford: Blackwell Science
Kirk, J., Miller, M.L. (1986) Reliability and validity of qualitative research. Berkeley, CA, itd: University of California Press
Krueger, R.A. (2000) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications
Lecompte, M.D., Goetz, J.P. (1982) Problems of reliability and vaidity in etnographic research. Review of Educational Research, vol. 52, br. 1, str. 31-60
Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic enquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications
Malterud, K. (2001) The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet, 358(9279): 397-400
Meyrick, J. (2006) What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5): 799-808
Millroy, L., Preissle, J., ur. Handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press
Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J. (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2): 13-22
Patton, M.Q. (2008) Evaluation criteria. u: Given L.M. [ur.] The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, str. 301-303
Patton, M.Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications
Richardson, L. (1991) Postmodern social theory representational practices. Sociological Theory, vol. 9, str. 173-9
Safman, R.M., Sobal, J. (2004) Qualitative sample extensiveness in health education research. Health Education & Behavior, 31 (9), str. 9-21
Smith, J.K. (1984) The problem of criteria for judging interpretative inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6 (4), str. 379-391
Yin, R.K. (1994) Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
DOI: 10.5937/socpreg1004485D
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 29.11.2011.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka