Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[25]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:489
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:328
članak: 1 od 1  
Geographica Pannonica
2014, vol. 18, br. 3, str. 69-81
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
doi:10.5937/GeoPan1403069L


Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za geografiju, turizam i hotelijerstvo
bUniversity of the Free State, Disaster Management Training and Education Centre (DiMTEC), Bloemfontein, South Africa

e-adresa: tin.lukic@dgt.uns.ac.rs

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
In recent times some publishers are intensively exploiting the model of open access publishing. During the last several years, studies have shown that there was a substantial increase in the number of fake publishers and hijacked journals. These cyber criminals make money by stealing the identities of legitimate journals and collecting the article processing charges on the papers that are submitted. This is all accomplished by a well developed framework that includes web development steps, intensive e-mail marketing and victim selections. This review article strives to recommend that the Beall's list of predatory publishers and journals should be consulted every time when an author plans to submit scientific work to some of the journals that are indexed by Thomson Reuters/Institute for Scientific Information-ISI and covered by the Journal Citation Report. Also, the authors are advised to be 'up to date' with new information regarding this controversial topic by informing themselves through various web-sites and specialized scientific portals. The review paper itself strives to summarize the most recent investigations on predatory and spurious journals/publishers which affect the entire scientific community, thus representing an outbreak with rising trend not only on national and regional level, but on global level as well.

Ključne reči

predatory; journals; publishers; hijacking; cyber criminals; scientific publishing; Beall's list

Reference

Basken, P. (2009) Open-access publisher appears to have accepted fake paper from Bogus Center: The chronicle of higher education. http://chronicle.com/article/Open-Access-Publisher-Appears/47717
Beall, J. (2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415): 179-179
Bohannon, J. (2013) Who's Afraid of Peer Review?. Science, 342(6154): 60-65
Butler, D. (2013) Sham journals scam authors. Nature, 495(7442): 421-422
Garfield, E. (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1): 90-3
Gilbert, N. (2009) Editor will quit over hoax paper. Nature
Jalalian, M., Mahboobi, H. (2013) New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. Electronic Physician-3, 685-686; 5
Jalalian, M., Mahboobi, H. (2014) Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research?. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 11-5, 389-394
Kolata, G. (2013) For scientists, an exploding world of pseudo-academia. New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-aca¬demia.html
Larsen, P.O., von Ins, M. (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3): 575-603
Rahman, J., Dexters, N., Engels, T.C.E. (2014) Predatory open access journals in a performance-based funding model: Common journals in Beall's list and in the VABB-SHW. u: Report of the Gezaghebbende Panel, Antwerpen: Expertisecentrum Onderzoek en Ontwikkelingsmonitoring - Centre for R and D Monitoring, 1-23