Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[2]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:20
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:14
članak: 1 od 1  
Kragujevac Journal of Science
2014, br. 36, str. 95-110
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan

The ontology supported intelligent system for experiment search in the scientific Research center
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of science, Kragujevac
bUniverzitet u Kragujevcu, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Institut za biologiju i ekologiju



Preklinička ispitivanja bioaktivnih supstanci (MPNTR - 41010)


(ne postoji na srpskom)
Ontologies and corresponding knowledge bases can be quite successfully used for many tasks that rely on domain knowledge and semantic structures, which should be available for machine processing and sharing. Using SPARQL queries for retrieval of required elements from ontologies and knowledge bases, can significantly simplify modeling of arbitrary structures of concepts and data, and implementation of required functionalities. This paper describes developed ontology for support of Research Centre for testing of active substances that conducts scientific experiments. According to created ontology corresponding knowledge base was made and populated with real experimental data. Developed ontology and knowledge base are directly used for an intelligent system of experiment search which is based on many criteria from ontology. Proposed system gets the desired search result, which is actually an experiment in the form of a written report. Presented solution and implementation are very flexible and adaptable, and can be used as kind of a template by similar information system dealing with biological or similar complex system.

Ključne reči

ontology; knowledge base; bio-experiments; active substances; SPARQL


*** MGED ontology.
*** Ontology for biomedical investigations.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O. (2001) The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5): 34-43
Gruber, T. (2001) What is an ontology?. Stanford University, http://wwwksl.
Harris, S., Prud'hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A. (2012) Sparql 1.1 query language: W3C working draft 05 January 2012. World Wide Web Consortium,
Mcguinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F. (2004) OWL web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation, 10(2004-03), 10
Noy, N.F., Shah, N.H., Whetzel, P.L., Dai, B., Dorf, M., Griffith, N., Jonquet, C., Rubin, D.L., Storey, M.-A., Chute, C.G., Musen, M.A. (2009) BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(Web Server): W170-W173
Orchard, S., Kersey, P., Hermjakob, H., Apweiler, R. (2003) The HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Meeting: Towards Common Standards for Exchanging Proteomics Data. Comparative and Functional Genomics, 4(1): 16-19
Rishe, N., Furht, B., Adjouadi, M., Barreto, A., Davis, D., Wolfson, O., Yesha, Y., Yesha, Y. (2011) Semantic Wrapper: Concise Semantic Querying of Legacy Relational Databases. u: Furht, Borko; Escalante, Armando [ur.] Handbook of Data Intensive Computing, New York, NY: Springer Nature America, Inc, str. 415-444
Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S. (2007) The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25(11): 1251-1255
Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L., Rosse, C. (2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology, 6(5): R46
Soldatova, L.N., King, R.D. (2005) Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies?. Nature biotechnology, 23 (9); 1095-1098
Soldatova, L.N., King, R.D. (2004) Ontology of Experiments for Bioinformatics. u: GIW 2004, Japanese Society for Bioinformatics, Abstract: P180
Soldatova, L.N., King, R.D. (2006) An ontology of scientific experiments. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3 (11); 795-803
Staab, S., Studer, R. (2010) Handbook on ontologies. Springer
Tomlinson, C.D., Barton, G.R., Woodbridge, M., Butcher, S.A. (2013) XperimentR: painless annotation of a biological experiment for the laboratory scientist. BMC Bioinformatics, 14(1): 8
University of Kragujevac-Faculty of Science-CPCTAS-LCMB Serbia,
Villanueva-Rosales, N., Dumontier, M. (2008) yOWL: An ontology-driven knowledge base for yeast biologists. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 41(5): 779-789