article: 1 from 1  
Acta chirurgica iugoslavica
2004, vol. 51, iss. 2, pp. 45-47
article language: English
Professional Paper
doi:10.2298/ACI0402045T

Recurrence rates at minimum five-year follow-up: Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the impact of surgical access to sigmoid resection on recurrence rates in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid (UDS) at a minimum follow- up of five years. Recurrence after surgery was defined as left lower quadrant pain, fever and leucocytosis with consistent CT and enema findings on admission and at 6 weeks, respectively. Outcome measures included splenic flexure mobilization, specimen length, inflammation at proximal resection margin and presence of teniae coli at distal resection margin. Seventy-nine patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) were compared with 79 matched controls with open sigmoid resection (OSR) operated on at two institutions during the same period. Patients were well matched for age, gender, body mass index, ASA grading and symptoms duration, but not for follow-up length (81.9 vs. 86.9 months, p = 0.046). The rate of splenic flexure mobilization (19 vs. 41, p 0.001), specimen length (16.1 vs. 18.3 cm, p = 0.048), presence of inflammation at proximal resection margin (21 vs. 4, p 0.001), and presence of teniae coli at distal resection margin (4 vs. 53, p 0.001). Three LSR patients and 7 OSR patients had one recurrence (p = 0.19). There were no significant differences in rates of flexure mobilization, specimen length, and rates of inflammation present at proximal resection margin in 10 recurring and 145 non-recurring patients. The rate of teniae coli present at distal resection margin was significantly increased in recurring patients (7 vs. 43, p = 0.03). Surgical access to sigmoid resection for UDS is unlikely to have an impact on recurrence rates provided that the oral bowel end is anastomosed to the proximal rectum rather than to the distal sigmoid.

Keywords

laparoscopic; sigmoid resection; diverticulitis

References

Benn, P.L., Wolff, B.G., Ilstrup, D.M. (1986) Level of anastomosis and recurrent colonic diverticulitis. Am J Surg, 151(2): 269-71
Bergamaschi, R., Arnaud, J.P. (1998) Anastomosis level and specimen length in surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc, 12(9): 1149-51
Bergamaschi, R., Arnaud, J.P. (1997) Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis following laparoscopic left colon resection. Surg Endosc, 11(8): 800-1
Hinchey, E.J., Schaal, P.G., Richards, G.K. (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg, 12: 85-109
Leigh, J.E., Judd, E.S., Waugh, J.M. (1962) Diverticulitis of the colon. Recurrence after apparently adequate segmental resection. Am J Surg, 103: 51-4
Liberman, M.A., Phillips, E.H., Carroll, B.J., Fallas, M., Rosenthal, R. (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc, 10(1): 15-8
Vargas, H.D., Ramirez, R.T., Hoffman, G.C., Hubbard, G.W., Gould, R.J., Wohlgemuth, S.D., Ruffin, W.K., Hatter, J.E., Kolm, P. (2000) Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum, 43(12): 1726-31
Wolff, B.G., Ready, R.L., MacCarty, R.L., Dozois, R.R., Beart, R.W. (1984) Influence of sigmoid resection on progression of diverticular disease of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum, 27(10): 645-7