- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual transition, spiral and evolutionary development of single Positive Law and plural normative order related to the comparative normative order study
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Sažetak
I. Pravni monizam (u pozitivnom javnom i privatnom pravu) ukazuje na to kako bi fizička i pravna lica trebalo da se ponašaju. Normativni pluralizam (normativni poredak javnog prava i privatnog prava) pokazuje kako se organi javne vlasti, fizička i pravna lica ponašaju u stvarnosti. Pravni monizam (kako treba da bude) i normativni pluralizam (ono kako jeste) nikada se ne podudaraju. II. Teorija međusobne tranzicije, spiralnog razvoja i evolucije pozitivnog prava i pravnog poretka uzima u obzir sve suprotnosti između njih i čini mogućom mirnu koegzistenciju pozitivizma i socioloških pravca u teoriji prava, i stvara ravnotežu između javnog i privatnog prava, i javnog normativnog poretka i privatnog normativnog poretka, na svetskom, regionalnom i lokalnom nivou. III. Teorija 'pravnih porodica' uporednog prava zanemaruje fenomen normativnog poretka, te je stoga neophodno uvesti novu granu pravne nauke: Proučavanja upoprednih normativnih poredaka. IV. Ideja pravičnog prava ukazuje na to koje i kakvo pravo zakonodavci (u romansko-germanskim, to jest, civilističkom sistemu) ili sudije (u anglo-američkom, odnosno common law sistemu) treba da stvaraju, tako da bi pravo bilo pravično sa stanovišta univerzalnih ljudskih prava. V. Međusobno preplitanje pravnog monizma, normativnog pluarlizma i ideje pravičnog prava mora se zasnivati na univerzalnom pravu ljudskih prava kao osnovnom subjektu norme, i ovaj proces se mora ponavljati dijaletktički, dakle spiralno, stalno, mora evoluirati, i mora biti neprestan.
Abstract
I. Legal Monism (Public Positive Law and Private Positive Law) indicates how natural and legal persons ought to act ideally. Normative Pluralism (Public Normative Order and Private Normative Order) shows how public bodies, and natural and legal persons acts really. Legal Monism (what ought to be) and Normative Pluralism (what is) never coincide. II. Theory about mutual transition, spiral and evolutionary development of positive law and normative order taking of any contradiction between them and making possible peacefully coexistence of positivism and sociologic directions in jurisprudence, and creates balance between public law and private law, and public normative order and private normative order on the global, regional, national and local levels. III. The 'legal families' theory of Comparative Law ignores the phenomenon of normative order. So it is necessary to introduce a new branch of legal science: Comparative Normative Orders Study. IV. The Idea of Just Law suggest what sort and kind of law legislators (in Roman-Germanic i.e. 'civilianist' legal space) or judges (in Anglo-American, i.e. common law legal space) should make, so that law would be just from the Universal Human Rights. V. The Mutual-Transition of Legal Monism, Normative Pluralism and Idea of Just Law must be based on the Universal Human Rights Law as Basic Norms' Entity, and this process must be repeated dialectically, i.e. spirally, constantly, evolutionary and endlessly.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (1969) Juridical forms of the citizens position in soviet society. Tbilisi: Academy of Sciences of Georgia, Monograph
|
|
|
*** (1971) Revue International de Droit Compare. Paris, Janvier-Mars
|
|
|
*** (1971) Ruch Prawniczy, Economizhny i Socjologiczny. Warszawa-Poznan, Kwartal Trzeci
|
|
|
*** (1983) Reinachs major work: 'The a priori foundations of civil law'. Aletheia, 3, trans. John Crosby
|
|
|
Alekseev, S.S. (1970) Jurisprudence, N 5, str. 106-107
|
|
2
|
Frank, J. (1949) Courts on Trial myth and reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press
|
|
|
Fridieff, M. (1971) Revue International de Droit Compare, Paris, str. 272-273, Janvier-Mars
|
|
|
Jokhadze, L. (2000) Intercultural communication and didactics of foreign word concepts. u: Aktuel Padagogik und Kulturdidactik, Tbilisi-Stutgart, str. 14
|
|
|
Jokhadze, L. (2008) Literary text as a stylistic-conceptual system. Tbilisi
|
|
|
Kelsen, H. (1919) Eine Grundlegung der Rechtssociologie. Archiv fur socialwisenschsft und socialpolitik, str. 40
|
|
1
|
Kelsen, H.V. (1946) General theory of law and state / Opšta teorija prava i države. Cambridge, MA, itd: Harvard University Press
|
|
|
Llewelyn, K. (1940) The normative, the legal and the law-jobs: The problem of juristic method. Yale Law Journal, 49: str. 1355-1360
|
|
|
Michalska, A. (1971) Ruch Prawniczy, Economizhny i Socjologiczny. Warszawa - Poznan, str. 305-307, In Polish, Kwartal Trzeci
|
|
|
Naneishvili, G. (1930) Positive law and normative facts. Tbilisi: State University Tbilisi
|
|
|
Ricoeur, P. (1983) Le Temp et Recit. Paris, Vol. I, p. 59
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (1968) Correlation between fundamental human rights and legal capacity of the citizens. Moscow, Candidates Dissertation Essays, In Russian)
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (1992) Evolutionary interaction between positive law and normative order from the point of view of comprehension of sense of law. Doctoral Dissertation Essays
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (1993) General theory of law. Manual, In Georgian
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (1977) Positive law and normative order. J. Law, N3, str. 34, in Georgian
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (2003) Jus cogens character of international human rights law, philosophy and legal theory for 21st century. Tbilisi, In English
|
|
|
Savaneli, B. (1981) Normative order and judicial practice. Tbilisi, in Russian
|
|
|
Twinning, W. (2000) Globalization and legal theory. London: Butterworths
|
|
1
|
Winch, P. (1958) The idea of social science. London, itd: Routledge and Kegan Paul
|
|
|
|
|