- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:0
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
2011, vol. 35, br. 1, str. 227-245
|
Sistemski uzroci i uslovi razvoja mobinga kao organizacione prakse
The systemic causes and conditions of development of mobbing as organizational practice
Sažetak
Psihološko ili moralno zlostavljanje na radnom mestu, ili mobing, je fenomen koji, svuda u svetu, poprima alarmantne dimenzije. Dominantni javni i naučni pristup je gotovo isključivo individualistički: razmatraju se pojavni oblici, povodi i simptomi bez zadiranja u sistemske uzroke i faktore. Rezultati brojnih istraživanja, realizovanih u ekonomski razvijenim zemljama, pokazuju, međutim, da smo suočeni sa problemom inherentnim aktuelnim društveno-ekonomskim prilikama. Mobing je patologija atomizacije društvenog korpusa na sve izolovanije i usamljenije pojedince okrenute sebi u brizi za sve neizvesniji opstanak na tržištu rada. Najuočljivije posledice savremenih odnosa moći i njima svojstvenih vidova simboličkog nasilja su kult individue, lične ambicije, imperativ neprestanog razvoja karijere, koji prikrivaju sve veću nemoć pojedinaca i razaraju društvene veze i solidarnost koje jedine tvore moć da se ti isti pojedinci zaštite od zloupotreba i ostvare i odbrane svoja legitimna prava i interese. Individualni pristupi rešavanju problema mobinga su, dakle, imanentni problemu a ne njegovom rešenju.
Abstract
The dominant public and scientific approach to the phenomenon of mobbing, which acquires alarming dimensions everywhere in the world, is almost exclusively individualistic: motives and symptoms are considered instead of systemic causes. The results of numerous research works show, however, that this problem is immanent to current socioeconomic circumstances marked by the atomization of social body into isolated individuals focused on themselves and their uncertain survival at the labour market. Most visible consequences are the cult of the individual, personal ambitions and compelling permanent development of one's career. They camouflage the ever greater helplessness of individuals and destroy the social links and solidarity as the only power able to protect those same individuals from abuse and enable them to realize and defend their legitimate rights and intereses. This may indicate why individual approaches to solving the mobbing problems are immanent to the problem itself and not to its solution.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2001) Rapport du comité interministériel sur le harcèlement psychologique au travail. Québec: Ministère du travail, www.travail.gouv.qc.ca/quoi_de_neuf/actualite/fs_harcel.html
|
|
Andersson, J. (2001) Rapport sur le harcèlement au travail. Parlement européen, Commission de lemploi et des affaires sociales, n 2001/2339, 16 jui
|
1
|
Brodsky, C.M. (1976) The harrased worker. Lexington: Lexington Books
|
|
Brun, J., Plante, E. (2004) Le harcèlement psychologique au travail au Québec. Québec: Chaire en gestion de la sante et de la securite du travail
|
|
Conseil Économique et Social (2001) Le harcèlement moral au travail. Paris: Les éditions des journaux officiels
|
|
Cru, D. (2001) Le Mal-Être au travail, comment intervenir?. Travail, Genre et Sociétés, 5, str. 57-73
|
|
Davenport, N., i dr. (1999) Mobbing: Emotional abuse in the american workplace. Ames: Civil society publishing
|
|
Dejours, C. (1988) Plaisir et souffrance dans le travail. Paris: Édition de lAOCIP, 2 vols
|
|
Dejours, C. (1993) Travail: Usure mentale. Paris: Bayard éditions
|
|
Dejours, C. (1998) Souffrance en France: La banalisation de linjustice sociale. Paris: Seuil
|
|
Dejours, C. (2001) Désolation et harcèlement moral. Le Monde, 10 avril, str. 10
|
|
Drida, M., i dr. (1999) Du harcèlement ou la violence discrète des relations de travail. Violence et Travail. Paris: CNAM, 91-100
|
|
Durieux, A., Jourdain, S. (1999) Lentreprise barbare. Paris: Albin Michel
|
25
|
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The end of history and the last man. New York, itd: Free Press
|
|
Hirigoyen, M. (1998) Le harcèlement moral. La violence perverse au quotidien. Paris: Syros
|
|
le Goff, J. (2000) Les illusions du management: Pour le retour du bon sens. Paris: La découverte
|
|
Leymann, H. (1990) Mobing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5 (2): 119-126
|
|
Leymann, H. (1996) Mobbing: La persécution au travail. Paris: Seuil
|
|
Leymann, H., Gustafsson, A. (1996) Mobbing at work and the development of post-traumatic stress disorders. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2): 251-275
|
3
|
Quine, L. (1999) Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: staff questionnaire survey. BMJ, 318(7178): 228-32
|
|
Soares, A. (2002) Quand le travail devient indecent. Montréal: CSQ
|
|
Zapf, D., Stale, E. (2003) Individual antecedents of bullying: Victims and perpetrators. u: Einarsen E., Hoel H., Zapf D., Cooper C.L. [ur.] Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice, London: Taylor & Francis
|
|
|
|