članak: 1 od 1  
Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja
2009, vol. 41, br. 2, str. 284-296
jezik rada: engleski
izvorni naučni članak
doi:10.2298/ZIPI0902284D
Fokus grupe kao sredstvo davanja glasa neuspešnim učenicima
Džinović Vladimir
Institut za pedagoška istraživanja, Beograd

e-adresa: vdzinovic@rcub.bg.ac.rs

Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 149001: Education for knowledge based society

Sažetak

Rad se bavi analizom diskursa o školskom neuspehu kod učenika gimnazije. Istraživačka strategija za ulaženje u dijalog sa učenicima je fokus grupa. Metoda za analizu materijala, dobijenog u razgovoru sa učenicima je analiza diskursa. Prvo, razmatraju se dve dominantne strategije upotrebe fokus grupa: kao sredstva za prikupljanje podataka i kao socijalne emancipatorne prakse. Mapirani su preovlađujući diskursi o školskom neuspehu: diskurs škole kao nesigurne investicije, diskrus marginalizacije škole, diskurs nezainteresovanosti učenika, diskurs nezainteresovanosti nastavnika i diskurs 'školski uspeh nema alternativu'. U završnom delu se razmatraju implikacije istraživanja na socijalni položaj učenika u odnosima moći u obrazovanju.

Ključne reči

školski neuspeh; analiza diskursa; fokus grupe

Reference

CrossRefKoBSON

Albrecht, S.F., Braaten, S. (2008) Strength-based assessment of behavior competencies to distinguish students referred for disciplinary intervention from nonreferred peers. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2): 91

3

Bilić, V. (2001) Uzroci, posljedice i prevladavanje školskog neuspjeha. u: Hrvatski pedagoško-književni zbor, Zagreb

12

Bruner, J.S. (1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, itd: Harvard University Press

de la Ossa, P. (2005) Hear my voice: Alternative high school students' perceptions and implications for school change. American Secondary Education, 34(1), 24- 39

CrossRefKoBSON

Easthope, C., Easthope, G. (2000) Intensification, extension and complexity of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1): 43

1

Fontana, A., Frey, J.H. (2005) The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. u: Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (ur.) The sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 695-729

Foucault, M. (1969) The abnormal. u: Rabinow P. (ur.) Ethics, subjectivity and truth, New York: The New Press

1

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Gergen, K., Gergen, M. (2004) Social construction: Entering the dialogue. Chagrin Falls, Ohio: Taos Institute Publications

CrossRefKoBSON

Gilrane, C.P., Roberts, M.L., Russell, L.A. (2008) Building a community in which everyone eaches, learns and reads: A case study. Journal of Educational Research, 101(6): 333

CrossRefKoBSON1

Gumora, G., Arsenio, W.F. (2002) Emotionality, emotion regulation and school performance in middle school children. Journal of School Psychology, vol. 40, br. 5, str. 395-413

Hopson, L.M., Steiker, L.K. (2008) Methodology for evaluating an adaptation of evidencebased drug abuse prevention in alternative schools. Children & Schools, 30, (2), 116-127

1

Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G. (2005) Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry. u: Denzin N.K., Y.S.Lincoln (ur.) The sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 887-909

36

Kelly, G.A. (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. New York, itd: Norton

1

Kendall, G., Wickham, G. (1999) Using Foucault's methods. Thousand Oaks, CA-London, itd: Sage Publications

CrossRefKoBSON3Scindeks

Malinić, D. (2007) Kako pomoći neuspešnom učeniku. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, vol. 39, br. 1, str. 86-98

CrossRefKoBSON

Moreau, M. (2007) Making sense of the glass ceiling in schools: An exploration of women teachers' discourses. Gender and Education, 19(2): 237

Okamoto, S.K., Mayeda, D.T., Ushiroda, M., Rehuher, D., Lauilefue, T., Ongalibang, O. (2008) Risk and protective factors of micronesian youth in Hawai'i: An exploratory study. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 35(2), 127-147

1

Parker, I. (1994) Discourse analysis. u: Banister P., Burman E., Parker I. (ur.) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide, Buckingham: Open University Press

1

Parker, I. (2005) Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Open University Press

CrossRefKoBSONScindeks

Pavlović, J., Džinović, V. (2007) Fokus grupe - od prikupljanja podataka do kritičke pedagoške prakse. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, vol. 39, br. 2, str. 289-308

1

Puchta, C., Potter, J. (2004) Focus group practice. London: SAGE Publications

Smith, J., Harré, R., Langenhove, L. (1995) Introduction. u: Smith J., Harré R., Langenhove L. (ur.) Rethinking methods in psychology, London: SAGE Publications

Stojnov, D., Dzinovic, V., Pavlovic, J. (2008) Kelly meets Foucault: Understanding school underachievement

9

Stojnov, D.B. (2005) Od psihologije ličnosti ka psihologiji osoba - konstruktivizam kao nova platforma u obrazovanju i vaspitanju. Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja

Tackett, W. (2005) A new perspective: An evaluation of youth by youth. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14(4), 5-12

CrossRefKoBSON

Wyatt, T.H., Krauskopf, P.B., Davidson, R. (2008) Using focus groups for program planning and evaluation. Journal of School Nursing, 24(2): 71

CrossRefKoBSON

Younger, M., Warrington, M., Williams, J. (1999) The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric?. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3): 325