kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak


  • citati u SCIndeksu: [11]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:3
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1


članak: 1 od 1  
2004, br. 10, str. 12-18
The search for a new development planning/policy mode: Problems of expertise in the transition period
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, Beograd
Ključne reči: planning legitimacy lost; disputed public interests; insufficient expertise; institutional and organisational arrangements; new development planning/policy heuristics
(ne postoji na srpskom)
The former system and practice of planning in Yugoslavia collapsed as early as towards the end of 1980s, not to be substituted for in the sequel by a new and legitimate development planning mode that has been compatible with the key processes and factors of the post-socialist transition, i.e., political pluralization, privatization, marketisation, and so forth. Under the recent circumstances, a number of new ‘ideologies of planning’ came to the surface, thereby rendering the current practice a peculiar mix of various concepts of ‘quasi/pseudo planning’ exercises, imbued with new biases, partisanship dominating the public scene, the notion of public interests almost lost, low transparency regarding the value and interest background of planning, etc. In effect, two general practices have been dominating the planning area, i.e., ‘crisis management’, and ‘planning-supporting-the-wild-privatisation-and-marketisation’. To a large extent, this has been caused by a poor experience, i.e., a lack of planners/experts to work under the new circumstances (‘transition’), paralleled by a lack of critical mass of social and economic actors interested in the sustainable development matters and supportive to them, and a wide spread anti-planning stance among the political and economic elites (‘architects of the transitional reforms’). A more modernizing and emancipatory model, e.g., ‘planning-supporting-complex-transformation of society’, seems to be still out of sight for some time to come. As the new coherent planning theory might not be expected for a longer period, preferably a preliminary planning heuristics would have to be elaborated, to more or less ‘safely’ direct the practice within the strategic framework defined. In this context, a number of specific issues of expertise would also have to be resolved, ranging from general theoretical and methodological issues, via practical methodologies, to the key issues within the triangle power – knowledge – action. Specifically, this should also apply to the majority of development planning policy documents that have been worked out in the recent period.
*** (2000-2003) Prostorni plan područja eksploatacije Kolubarskog lignitskog basena / Spatial Plan for the Kolubara Lignite Basin. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS, Radni materijali
*** (2002-2003) Prostorni plan područja eksploatacije Kostolačko-kovinskog lignitskog basena / Spatial Plan for the Kostolac - Kovin Lignite Basin. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS, Radni materijali
*** (2002) Prostorni plan područja infrastrukturnog koridora Niš - granica Republike Makedonije / Spatial Plan for the Infrastructure Belt from Niš to the Border of FYROM. Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, 77/2002
*** (2003) Regionalni prostorni plan Administrativnog područja Beograda - 3 faza, Nacrt Plana (Regional Spatial Plan of the Belgrade Administrative Area, Phase 3, Draft). Beograd: Urbanistički zavod Grada Beograda, mart
*** (2003) Generalni urbanistički plan Beograda do 2021. Beograd: Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda
*** (1994-2003) Generalni urbanistički plan Budve / Master urban Plan of Budva. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS, Radni dokumenti
*** (2003) Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji. Beograd: Ministarstvo urbanizma i gradjevina Republike Srbije
Allmendinger, P. (2002) Planning theory. New York-Basingstoke, itd: Palgrave
Allmendinger, P. (2002) Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. London-New York, itd: Routledge
Flyvbjerg, B. (2003) Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, itd: Cambridge University Press / CUP
Gilg, A., Kelly, M. (1996) The analysis of development control decisions: A position statement and some new insights from recent research in southwest England. Town Planning Review, 67 (2), 203-228
Grupa autora (1996) Prostorni plan Republike Srbije - planska i analitičko-dokumentaciona osnova
Harvey, D. (1982) On planning of the ideology of planning. u: Burchell R. W., Sternlieb G. [ur.] Planning Theory in 1980, New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University - Center for Urban Policy Research, 213-233
Lješević, M. (2002) Pravci razvoja Crne Gore ekološke države. Podgorica: ECPD Evropski centar za mir i razvoj, Univerzitet za mir Ujedinjenih nacija
Mandelbaum, S. (1979) A complete general theory of planning is impossible. Policy Sciences, 11, 59-71
Ministarstvo za nauku, tehnologije i razvoj Republike Srbije (2003) Strategija privrednog razvoja Republike Srbije do 2010. godine / Economic Development Strategy of Serbia till 2010. Beograd, Knjiga I, Knjiga II
Nedović-Budić, Z. (2001) Adjustment of planning practice to the new eastern and central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (1), 38-52
Sillince, J. (1986) A theory of planning. Aldershot, UK: Gower
Simmie, J. (1989) Self-management and town planning in Yugoslavia. Town Planning Review, 60 (3), 271-286
Urlich, W. (1994) Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. New York, itd: Wiley
Vujošević, M. (2001) Geography lost and found. u: Integrating Six Balkan Countries through the Co-projects ESTIA and OSPE, Early experience, Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban and Spatial Planning of Serbia
Vujošević, M., Filipović, M. (2002) Serbia at the turn of the XXI century: The spatial and urban development planning policies of the 1990s failed and a 'New beginning'?. u: EURA Conference 'Urban and Spatial European Policies: Levels of Territorial Government', Torino
Vujošević, M. (2003) National priorities in the regional development context: Findings on the co-projects ESTIA/OSPE (CADSES/Vision planet) and common priorities for the future - an independent view. u: Consequences of the EU Enlargement, Proceedings of the International Seminar, CEMAT, Maribor: Ministry of the Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy of the Republic of Slovenia, 65-77
Vujošević, M. (2002) Novije promene u teoriji i praksi planiranja na Zapadu i njihove pouke za planiranje u Srbiji-Jugoslaviji. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS
Vujošević, M. (2002) Komentari Nacrta Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji / Comments on the Draft of the Planning and Construction Act. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS, unpublished paper
Vujošević, M. (2003) Planiranje u postsocijalističkoj političkoj i ekonomskoj tranziciji. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS
Vujošević, M.L. (2002) O novim metodološkim i drugim standardima u planiranju - povodom Generalnog plana Beograda 2021. Arhitektura i urbanizam, br. 9, str. 85-89
Yiftachel, O. (1998) Planning and social control: Exploring the dark sides. Journal of Planning Literature, 12 (4), 395-406

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
DOI: 10.2298/SPAT0410012V
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.06.2007.