- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:[2]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:14
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:10
|
|
2015, vol. 12, br. 2, str. 155-170
|
Empirijska komparativna analiza beneficija za zaposlene u multinacionalnim kompanijama - primeri Rumunije i Srbije
Employee benefits in multinational firms: Empirical evidence for Romania and Serbia
Sažetak
Ovaj rad ima za cilj da analizira beneficije koje zaposlenima posle prestanka radnog odnosa obezbeđuju multinacionalne kompanije, s akcentom na pogodnostima za penzionisanje i penzioni sistem u Rumuniji i Srbiji. Ekonomska literatura ističe bitnu ulogu programa penzionisanja u osiguranju odgovarajućeg nivoa dohotka posle penzionisanja, u cilju smanjivanja siromaštva i povećanja produktivnosti, sa značajnim pozitivnim efektima na sveukupnoj ekonomskoj aktivnosti. Naše istraživanje je zasnovano na razvoju nekoliko dvostrukih logaritamskih modela sa fiksnim i slučajnim efektima kao i dinamičkog modela sa raspoređenim vremenskim pomakom, koristeći panel strukturu za period 2005-2013. i kompleksan set indikatora (nacionalni računi - BDP ukupno i po stanovniku; tržište rada - zaposlenost, nezaposlenost, produktivnost, zarade; srednje i visoko obrazovanje; specifični podaci za penzije - opšti korisnici, starosne penzije i minimalne penzije, ukupno i po polu, kao i troškovi za penzije kao procenat BDP). Rezultati pokazuju da penzije predstavljaju podstrek za zaposlene utičući na porast produktivnosti rada. Istovremeno, starosne penzije pozitivno utiču na privredni rast i zaposlenost u obe ispitivane zemlje, značajno smanjujući stopu siromaštva penzionera. Ipak, oba penziona sistema su modelirana prema ekonomskoj aktivnosti, obrazovanju zaposlenih kao i prema nivou neto zarada.
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze post-employment benefits provided by multinational firms, focusing on retirement advantages and pension systems in Romania and Serbia from a comparative empirical perspective. Economic literature highlights the essential role played by pension schemes in assuring a proper level of income after retirement, thus reducing poverty and increasing productivity, with significant positive implications upon overall economic activity. our research is based on developing several double-log fixed and random effects models, as well as a dynamic and distributed lags model, using a panel structure over the 2005- 2013 period and a complex set of indicators (national accounts - GDP total and per capita; labor market - employment, unemployment, productivity, earnings; secondary and tertiary education; pension specific data - general beneficiaries, old age and survivor pensioners, total and by gender, and pension expenses as percentage of GDP). The results show that pensions represent an incentive for employees leading to an increase in resource productivity. At the same time, old age pensions are positively shaping economic growth and employment for the two countries considered, significantly reducing the poverty rate for pensioners. Nevertheless, the two pensions systems are modelled by the economic activity, educational background of employees, as well as by the level of net earnings.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** International accounting standard 19 - IAS 19: Employee benefits
|
|
*** International accounting standard 26 - IAS 26: Accounting and reporting by retirement benefit plans
|
|
Banerjee, D., Perrucci-Cummings, C. (2012) Employee Benefits and policies: Do They Make a Difference for Work/Family Conf lict?. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39(3); 131-147
|
|
Baum, C.F. (2001) An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Stata press
|
|
Beju, D. (2007) Coordonate ale reformei sistemului de pensii: cazul României. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16-32; 20
|
|
Clark, R., Melinda, S.M., Vanderweide, D. (2013) Defined benefit pension plan distribution decisions by public sector employees. Journal of Public Economics, 1-16
|
|
Dorsey, S., Cornwell, C., Macpherson, D. (1998) pensions and the labor market. u: Pensions and Productivity, Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1-12
|
|
European Commission Eurostat database: Eu LFS, national accounts, labor market, demography - population
|
1
|
Lazear, E. (2000) Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, vol. 90, br. 5, str. 1346- 1361
|
|
Mulvaney, M. (2011) A Study of the Role of Family-Friendly Employee Benefits programs, Job Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy among public park and Recreation Employees. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 29(1); 58-79
|
|
National House of public pensions in Romania, Department of projects, studies and analyses Monthly statistics. pillar I
|
2
|
Simon, H.A. (1991) Organizations and markets. J Econ Perspect, br. 5, str. 25-44
|
|
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) (2012) Employee benefits: A research report. u: The employee benefits landscape in a recovering economy
|
25
|
Statistical office of the Republic of Serbia
|
|
|
|