|
Fizička kultura između racionalizma i teoantropocentrizma
Physical culture between rationalism and theoanthropocentrism
Sažetak
Fizička kultura, sa čovekom u svom središtu, bila je i ostala deo i pratilac društvenih prilika i neprilika u različitim vremenima i epohama. Bez obzira na potrebu da svoju teoriju i praksu prilagođava (za)datim zahtevima vremena i društvenih prilika u tim vremenima, uvek je bila razapeta između racionalizma i teoantropocentrizma. Još od vremena Pitagore, Epikura, Platona, kasnije Origena i neoplatonista, i Dekartovog "Mislim, dakle postojim", racionalizam i njegovo desno krilo prosvetiteljstvo orali su duboke brazde (i) u polju fizičke kulture. O rezultatu sveopšteg delovanja racionalista veliki Njegoš je u svojoj Luči mikrokozma dao jasnu ocenu: "Pitagore i ti, Epikure, ... Vi ste ljudsko ime unizili." Zaista, dovoljan je i letimičan pogled na današnja dešavanja i razvojni put sporta i fizičkog vežbanja, pa da se uverimo u istinitost ovih reči. A sa druge strane, teoantropocentrizam svojom teorijom i praksom vraća nadu da nije sve propalo, kad propalo sve je (R. P. Nogo). Teoantropocentrizam, ili Bogočovekocentrizam, kako bi još mogao da se imenuje, čoveku prilazi s Ljubavlju i znanjem da je fizička vežba blagodatna hrana biću čoveka. I da mu je TA hrana data kako bi mogao da ovlada dobrima, od Svestvoritelja darivanim, da se učvrsti, osnaži i oboži. Zato možemo da kažemo da su racionalizam i teoantropocentrizam dva pogleda i dva pristupa čoveku (i) u savremenom dobu. Iza prvog stoji gordost, iza drugog Ljubav. Na čoveku je da izabere put kojim će ići.
Abstract
Physical culture with the man in its centre has always been an integral part of social events and troubles in various times and ages. Regardless the need to adjust its theory and practice to the given requirements and social circumstances of the time it has always been stretched between rationalism and theanthropos-centrism. Rationalism and its right wing the Enlightenment had formed deep furrows in the area of physical culture, (too) since the age of Pythagoras, Epicurus, Plato and later Origen and the Neoplatonists and Descartes' ''I think, therefore I am''. The great Njegoš made a clear judgement of the general effects of Rationalism in his work The Ray of the Microcosm: ''You, Pythagoras and you, Epicurus, ... You have degraded a being a man.'' Indeed, only a glimpse at today's events and the development of sport and physical exercise is enough to prove his words to be true. On the other hand, thenathropos-centrism with its theory and practice bring back hope that not all is lost, when everything is lost (R.P. Nogo). Theanthroposcentrism or, God-man centrism as it can be called, approaches man with Love and belief that physical exercises is divine food for the human being. And that the food is given to him so that he can master the good as gifted from the Creator, to stand firm, get strong and divinized. Therefore, we can say that Rationalism and Thanthropos-centrism are two views of and two approaches to man (even) in modern times. Behind the first one there is pride whereas behind the second one there is Love. It is up to man himself to choose his way.
|