- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:44
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:7
|
|
2018, vol. 9, br. 1, str. 47-66
|
Društveni faktori nejednakih šansi u obrazovanju
Social factors unequal opportunities in education
Sažetak
Rad je analiza nekih društvenih faktora: ekonomskih, socijalnih, kulturnih, političkih, na reprodukciju ili samoreprodukciju nejednakosti u obrazovanju. U analizi se polazi od sagledavanja stanja i uloge obrazovanja u savremenom društvu. Razmatra se uloga obrazovanja kao kanala socijalne promocije pojedinaca i društvenih grupa u savremenom društvu, nakon 50ih godina dvadesetog veka. To je period koji se poklapa sa naučno-tehnološkom revolucijom, pojavom mikroprocesora i veštačke inteligencije, kao i promenama u makro- i mikroekonomiji. Obrazovanje postaje masovno i sveobuhvatno i na osnovnom i na nivou srednje škole. Razvija se univerzitetsko obrazovanje i sve je veći obuhvat stanovništva uključen i u ovaj nivo obrazovanja. Obrazovanje postaje važno za sticanje profesionalnih kompetencija i za obavljanje konkretnih poslova. Zanimanja se profesionalizuju i obrazovanje, kao kontinuirano i celoživotno učenje, postaje neophodan uslov za opstanak u profesiji i napredovanje. Obrazovanje postaje značajan faktor za socijalnu diferencijaciju i zauzimanje društvenog položaja. Na mogućnosti pojedinaca u ostvarivanju obrazovnih postignuća i dalje utiču brojni društveni faktori, kao što su socijalno diferencirajući faktori, mehanizmi socijalne selekcije. Ti faktori su ekonomska moć društva, ekonomske performanse porodice, kulturni kapital porodice, otvorenost i zatvorenost društva, institucionalna razvijenost, socijalna politika društva, društvena solidarnost, uticaj političkog sistema, stepen opšte društvene nejednakosti, stepen siromaštva, mapa siromaštva, društvena stabilnost i slično. Kako se i koliko ovi faktori reflektuju na ne/jednakost šansi pojedinaca i grupa u obrazovanju pokazuje ova analiza na primeru nekih zemalja u tranziciji, nerazvijenih i visokorazvijenih.
Abstract
The paper is an analysis of some social factors: economic, social, cultural, political to the reproduction or self-reproduction of inequalities in education. The analysis starts from the examination of the state and role of education in contemporary society. The role of education as a channel for the social promotion of individuals and social groups in contemporary society after the 1950s is considered. It is a period that coincides with the scientific-technological revolution, the emergence of microprocessors and artificial intelligence, as well as changes in macro and microeconomics. Education becomes massive and comprehensive both at the primary and the secondary school level. University education is being developed and the coverage of the population which is included in this level of education is being increased. Education becomes important for acquiring professional competencies and for performing specific tasks. Occupations are professionalized and education, as continuous and lifelong learning, becomes a necessary condition for survival in the profession and for advancing in the career. Education becomes a significant factor for social differentiation and occupation of a social position. Numerous social factors, as well as socially differentiating factors, mechanisms of social selection still continue to affect the opportunities of individuals in the realization of educational achievements. These factors are the economic power of society, economic performance of the family, cultural capital of the family, openness and closeness of society, institutional development, social policy of society, social solidarity, the influence of the political system, the degree of general social inequality, the degree of poverty, the poverty map, social stability, etc. This analysis shows how and to what extent these factors reflect the un/equal opportunities of individuals and groups in education on the example of some countries in transition, as well as some underdeveloped and highly developed countries.
|
|
|
Reference
|
1
|
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., Turner, B.S. (1984) Dictionary of sociology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
|
|
Bloom, E.E., Rosovsk, H. (2006) Higher Education in Developing Countries. International Handbook of Higher Education, 443-459; 18
|
|
Bogdanović, M. (1987) Aktuelnost i značaj sociološkog proučavanja društvenih nejednakosti. u: Društvene nejednakosti, Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta, str. 25
|
|
Burda, M., Viploš, Č. (2012) Makroekonomija - evropski udžbenik. peto izdanje
|
|
Davis, K., Moore, W.E. (1945) Some Principles of Stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2): 242
|
|
Đorđević, M.R. (2007) Sociologija. Novi Sad: CEKOM books, 186-189
|
|
Haralambos, M. (1996) Uvod u sociologiju - izabrane teme. Novi Sad
|
|
Haralambos, M., Holborn, M. (2002) Sociologija: Teme i perspektive. Zagreb: Golden marketing, str. 929
|
|
Lojpur, A., Peković, S. (2013) Znanje i inovaciona politika zemalja u tranziciji kao mjera spremnosti za ulazak u EU. Economics & Economy, vol. 1, br. 2, 61-75
|
|
Nedvek, B., Neal, J. (1994) Performance indicators and regional management tools. Research in Higher Education, 75-104; 35
|
2
|
Parsons, T. (1991) Društva. Zagreb: August Cesarec
|
|
Perez, M.S., Rodriguez, B., Luque, M. (2016) Assessing global competitiveness under multi-criteria perspective. Economing Modelling, 398-408; 53
|
2
|
Popović, M. (1974) Problemi društvene strukture. Beograd: BIGZ
|
1
|
Popović, M.V. (1984) Klasno-slojne nejednakosti u jugoslovenskom društvu. Sociologija, br. 3-4
|
|
Sorokin, P.A. (1939) Social and cultural hability. Glencoe: Free Press, 111, str. 1113
|
|
Spence, M. (2008) The growth report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Washington, DC: World Bank-Comission on Growth and Development, Final Report
|
|
Tanasković, S., Ristić, B. (2016) Konkurentska pozicija Srbije u 2016. godini prema Izveštaju Svetskog ekonomskog foruma
|
|
Turajlić, S. (2003) Trendovi razvoja - bolonjski proces i tehnički fakulteti. u: Bolonjski proces u Srbiji, IX naučni skup, Kopaonik, 3-6 mart, 7-8
|
11
|
Veber, M. (1976) Privreda i društvo. Beograd: Prosveta, 1. tom, str. 241
|
|
West, A., Nouden, P., Gosling, R. (2000) Quality in higher education: An international perspective: The views of transnational corporations. London School of Economics and Political Science, Market Papers, 17
|
3
|
World Economic Forum (2016) The global competitiveness report. Geneva
|
3
|
World Economic Forum (2015) The global competitiveness report. Geneva
|
3
|
World Economic Forum (2014) The global competitiveness report. Geneva
|
1
|
Zubović, J., Bradić-Martinović, A. (2014) Competitiveness of Nations in selected SEE Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 755-762; 8
|
12
|
Županov, J. (1985) Marginalije o društvenoj krizi. Zagreb: Globus
|
|
|
|