Landscape metrics application in ecological and visual landscape assessment

Gavrilović, Suzana; Vasiljević, Nevena; Radić, Boris; Pihler, Vladimir

doi:10.2298/GSF1716029G

Akcije

dodaj u Moj izbor [0]

kako citirati ovaj članak
prikaži na oba jezika
podeli ovaj članak

Direktan link

Metrika

citati u SCIndeksu: 0
citati u CrossRef-u:0
citati u Google Scholaru:[]
posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 13

povratak na rezultate

Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta

2017, br. 116, str. 29-50

Primena metrike predela u ekološkoj i vizuelnoj proceni predela

Gavrilović Suzana^a

, Vasiljević Nevena^a

, Radić Boris^a, Pihler Vladimir^b

^aUniverzitet u Beogradu, Šumarski fakultet
^bJP Zavod za urbanizam Vojvodine

e-adresa: suzana.d.gavrilovic@gmail.com

Ključne reči: predeona metrika; struktura predela; ekološka procena predela; vizuelna procena predela

Sažetak

Predeono-ekološki istraživački pristup u planiranju prostora pruža egzaktne teorijske i empirijske dokaze za praćenje ekoloških posledica nastalih prirodnim i/ili antropogenim faktorima, odnosno promenama prostornih struktura koje su njima uslovljene. Predeoni obrazac u kome su materijalizovane različite vrednosti predela je nosilac jedinstvenog karaktera predela na različitim prostornim nivoima i predstavlja perceptivni domen njegovih korisnika. Pokazatelji konfiguracije i kompozicije obrasca predela su matematički algoritmi koji kvantifikuju specifične prostorne karakteristike, kojim se interpretiraju predeone funkcije i procesi (fizički i ekološki aspekt), ali i forme (vizuelan aspekt) i značenja (kognitivan aspekt) predela. Metoda metrike predela je našla najveću primenu u analizi ekoloških prostornih procesa i biodiverziteta kao i utvrđivanju nivoa promena strukture, međutim sve veću primenu nalazi i u proceni vizuelnog karaktera predela. Cilj rada je da se na osnovu pregleda relevantne literature prikažu osnovni trendovi primene metrike predela u utvrđivanju ekoloških i vizuelnih procena predela. Metod istraživanja je zasnovan na analizi, sistematizaciji i klasifikaciji publikovanih radova u periodu od 2000. do 2016. godine, u kojima se primenjuje metrika predela u: (1) analizi predeonog obrasca i njegovih promena, (2) analizi biodiverziteta i funkcija staništa i (3) vizuelnoj proceni predela. Izdvajanjem reprezentativnih parametara metrike kompozicije i konfiguracije predela formirana je osnova za dalja istraživanja primene metrike predela u integralnoj analizi i proceni ekoloških i vizuelnih vrednosti predela. Savremenom konceptualizacijom predeo se posmatra holistički, a imperativ budućim istraživanjima treba usmeriti u pravcu razvoja integralne analize, vrednovanja i procene predela kao celine za potrebe planiranja prostornog razvoja.

Abstract

The development of landscape-ecological approach application in spatial planning provides exact theoretical and empirical evidence for monitoring ecological consequences of natural and/or anthropogenic factors, particularly changes in spatial structures caused by them. Landscape pattern which feature diverse landscape values is the holder of the unique landscape character at different spatial levels and represents a perceptual domain for its users. Using the landscape metrics, the parameters of landscape composition and configuration are mathematical algorithms that quantify the specific spatial characteristics used for interpretation of landscape features and processes (physical and ecological aspect), as well as forms (visual aspect) and the meaning (cognitive aspect) of the landscape. Landscape metrics has been applied mostly in the ecological and biodiversity assessments as well as in the determination of the level of structural change of landscape, but more and more applied in the assessment of the visual character of the landscape. Based on a review of relevant literature, the aim of this work is to show the main trends of landscape metrics within the aspect of ecological and visual assessments. The research methodology is based on the analysis, classification and systematization of the research studies published from 2000 to 2016, where the landscape metrics is applied: (1) the analysis of landscape pattern and its changes, (2) the analysis of biodiversity and habitat function and (3) a visual landscape assessment. By selecting representative metric parameters for the landscape composition and configuration, for each category is formed the basis for further landscape metrics research and application for the integrated ecological and visual assessment of the landscape values. Contemporary conceptualization of the landscape is seen holistically, and the future research should be directed towards the development of integrated landscape assessment as a guideline for spatial development planning.

	Reference
	Aguilera, F., Valenzuela, L.M., Botequilha-Leitão, A. (2011) Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(3-4): 226-238
4	Antrop, M. (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2): 21-34
	Antrop, M., van Eetvelde, V. (2000) Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(1-3): 43-58
	Antrop, M. (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77(1-2): 17-28
	Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Cerny, M., de Blust, G., de Cock, R., Diekötter, T., Dietz, H., Dirksen, J., Dormann, C., Durka, W., Frenzel, M., Hamersky, R. (2007) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(1): 141-150
	Bourassa, S.C. (1988) Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15(3-4): 241-252
	Council of Europe (2000) European landscape convention and explanatory report: T-LAND 2000: Document by the Secretary General established by the General Directorate of Education, Culture, Sport and Youth, and Environment. Strasbourg
	Daniel, T.C., Meitner, M.M. (2001) Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1): 61-72
	de la Fuente, de V.G., Atauri, J.A., de Lucio, J.V. (2006) Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(4): 393-407
2	Dewey, J. (1934/1980) Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group, II edition [I edition]
	DiBari, J.N. (2007) Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: the case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3-4): 308-313
	Dramstad, W.E., Tveit, M. S., Fjellstad, W.J., Fry, G.L.A. (2006) Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4): 465-474
	Fahrig, L. (2002) Effect of Habitat Fragmentation on the Extinction Threshold: A Synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12(2): 346
	Fan, C., Myint, S. (2014) A comparison of spatial autocorrelation indices and landscape metrics in measuring urban landscape fragmentation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121: 117-128
	Forman, R., Godron, M. (1986) Landscape ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons
	Frank, S., Fürst, C., Koschke, L., Witt, A., Makeschin, F. (2013) Assessment of landscape aesthetics-Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators, 32: 222-231
	Fry, G., Tveit, M.S., Ode, Å., Velarde, M.D. (2009) The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5): 933-947
1	Herold, M., Scepan, J., Clarke, K.C. (2002) The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses. Environment and Planning A, 34(8): 1443-1458
	Honnay, O., Piessens, K., van Landuyt, W., Hermy, M., Gulinck, H. (2003) Satellite based land use and landscape complexity indices as predictors for regional plant species diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(4): 241-250
	Kim, K., Pauleit, S. (2007) Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: The case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea. Land Use Policy, 24(1): 264-274
	Kumar, S., Stohlgren, T.J., Chong, G.W. (2006) Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology, 87(12): 3186-3199
	Lausch, A. (2002) Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators, 2(1-2): 3-15
	Leitão, B.A., Miller, J., Ahern, J., Mcgarigal, K. (2006) Measuring landscapes: A planner's handbook. Washington: Island Press
	Lothian, A. (1999) Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4): 177-198
	Luck, M., Wu, J. (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology, 17(4): 327-339
	McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A. (2002) Comparative Evaluation of Experimental Approaches to the Study of Habitat Fragmentation Effects. Ecological Applications, 12(2): 335
	McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J. (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service
	Moser, D., Zechmeister, H.G., Plutzar, C., Sauberer, N., Wrbka, T., Grabherr, G. (2002) Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 17(7): 657-669
	Ode, Å., Hagerhall, C.M., Sang, N. (2010) Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application. Landscape Research, 35(1): 111-131
	Ode, Å., Miller, D. (2011) Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1): 24-40
	Palmer, J.F. (2004) Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3): 201-218
	Peng, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Li, W., Li, Y. (2010) Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns. Ecological Indicators, 10(2): 217-223
	Plexida, S.G., Sfougaris, A.I., Ispikoudis, I.P., Papanastasis, V.P. (2014) Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity-A comparison among Greek landscapes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26: 26-35
	Porteous, J.D. (1996) Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning. London: Routledge
	Radić, B. (2014) Erozija kao faktor degradacije predela u skijaškim centrima Srbije. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Šumarski fakultet, doktorska disertacija
	Sang, N., Miller, D., Ode, Å. (2008) Landscape Metrics and Visual Topology in the Analysis of Landscape Preference. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(3): 504-520
	Schindler, S., von Wehrden, H., Poirazidis, K., Wrbka, T., Kati, V. (2013) Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecological Indicators, 31: 41-48
	Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K., Wrbka, T. (2008) Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: A case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators, 8(5): 502-514
	Southworth, J., Nagendra, H., Tucker, C. (2002) Fragmentation of a Landscape: Incorporating landscape metrics into satellite analyses of land-cover change. Landscape Research, 27(3): 253-269
1	Terkenli, T.S. (2001) Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3-4): 197-208
	Tveit, M., Ode, Å., Fry, G. (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3): 229-255
	Uuemaa, E., Antrop, M., Roosaare, J., Marja, R., Mander, Ü. (2009) Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1-28
	Uuemaa, E., Mander, Ü., Marja, R. (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators, 28: 100-106
	Vasiljević, N. (2012) Planiranje predela kao instrument prostornog razvoja Srbije. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Šumarski fakultet, doktorska disertacija
	Vasiljević, N., Živković, J. (2009) A new approach to landscape in the spatial development strategy of Serbia: A step toward implementation of european landscape convention. 197-216
	Vasiljević, N. (2009) Evropski koncept karakterizacije predela - veza sa planiranjem prostora. Vol V, str. 407- 420
	Vasiljević, N., Radić, B., Gavrilović, S. (2014) Landscape character metrics: A new methodological approach to landscape planning. 69-70
	Vasiljević, N., Gavrilović, S., Šljukić, B. (2014) Karakter predela Mladenovca - očuvanje vrednosti primenom principa umrežavanja. Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, br. 62, str. 91-120
1	Vasiljević, N., Radić, B. (2016) Kulturni predeo - od zaštićene vrednosti do planskog koncepta. Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta, br. 114, str. 257-278
	von Haaren, C. (2002) Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2): 73-80
	Wania, A., Kühn, I., Klotz, S. (2006) Plant richness patterns in agricultural and urban landscapes in Central Germany-spatial gradients of species richness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1-2): 97-110
	Weng, Y. (2007) Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(4): 341-353
	Westphal, M.I., Field, S.A., Tyre, A.J., Paton, D., Possingham, H.P. (2003) Effects of Landscape Pattern on Bird Species Distribution in the Mt. Lofty Ranges. Landscape Ecology, 18(4): 413-426
	Wu, J., Jenerette, G. D., Buyantuyev, A., Redman, C.L. (2011) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: The case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecological Complexity, 8(1): 1-8
	Živković, J., Vasiljević, N. (2013) Predeo kao konceptualni okvir održive arhitekture i urbanog dizajna. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Arhitektonski fakultet, 26-41

O članku

jezik rada: srpski, engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.2298/GSF1716029G
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 15.12.2017.

Povezani članci

Zaštita prirode (2016)
Predeo izuzetnih odlika Tršić-Tronoša - studija karaktera predela kao osnov za zaštitu i planiranje kulturnog predela
Cvijić Dragan, i dr.

Zb PMF Geog inst Beograd (2014)
Karakter predela Mladenovca - očuvanje vrednosti primenom principa umrežavanja
Vasiljević Nevena, i dr.

Geographica Pannonica (2020)
Environmental consequences of the urban sprawl in the suburban zone of Nitra: An analysis based on landcover data
Hardi Tamás, i dr.

prikaži sve [7]