Akcije

Balkan Journal of Stomatology
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:0
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0

Sadržaj

članak: 4 od 9  
Back povratak na rezultate
2013, vol. 17, br. 3, str. 134-138
Evaluation of 2 different types of extra-coronal frictional attachments with plastic matrices in contemporary dental prosthodontics
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniversity ,,Ss. Cyril and Methodius', Faculty of Dentistry, Skopje, FYROM
bEuropian University, Faculty of Dentistry, Skopje, FYROM
cUniversity of Goce Delcev, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shtip, FYROM
Ključne reči: Extra-Coronal Attachments; AcryLock; Vario-Soft 3
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
Nowadays, due to fast dental progress, planning of partial dentures is continuously improving, permitting application of contemporary and modern retention systems. Because of the presence of many different dental attachments on the market, the decision which one to use for each particular case is a big challenge for the dentist. The purpose of this paper is to examine the advantages and disadvantages of extra-coronal frictional attachments with plastic matrices and to present a critical review for 2 types of retention systems. We used 2 types of extra-coronal frictional attachments with plastic matrices: the AcryLock attachments and the Vario-Soft 3 attachments. The results confirm that AcryLock and Vario-Soft 3 represent similar systems. They insure good retention, with an additional option for dosed retention by using different plastic matrices depending on each particular case. Although these attachments with plastic parts are not newest innovation, they have a big value due to their characteristics - durability, affordable price and possibility for easy and simple maintenance, offering a chance to replace the plastic part if necessary. They insure high quality and long lasting dental prosthodontic appliances that can be used in many different situations.
Reference
*** Microdent catalog: Acry lock the resin attachment. Germany: Microdent-Attachment GmbH & Co. KG
*** (1991) Konstruktionen für den partiellen Zahnersatz. Eine Dokumentation der ZL-Microdent Attachment GMBH
*** Bredent catalog: The vario-soft attachment group. Germany: Bredent GmbH & Co. KG
Brudvik, J. (1999) Advanced removable partial dentures. Quintessence publishing Co Inc
Carlos, S.A., Bodereau, F.E. (2004) Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures. Quintessence lnt, 35: 443-448
Holst, S., Eitner, S. (2006) In Vitro Wear of Different Material Combinations of Intracoronal Precision Attachments. Int J Prosthod, 19(49); 330-332
Pontsa, P. (2008) Precision milling for partial denture design. Dent-Liner, vol. 12, Issue 1, Winter
Rutkunas, V., Mizutani, H., Takahashi, H. (2007) Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34(1): 41-51
Veleski, D., Pejkovska, B., Antanasova, M. (2012) Biophysical principles of the AcryLock attachments use in contemporary prosthetic dentistry. Balkan Journal of Stomatology, vol. 16, br. 2, str. 98-102
Veleski, D. (2011) Klinika i tehnika na parcijalnite protezi - Klinika i tehnika na skeletiranite parcijalni protezi. Skopje: Stomatoloski fakultet
Veleski, D. (2012) Klinika i tehnika na parcijalnite protezi. u: Veleski D. [ur.] Metalni kompleksni protezi, Skopje: Stomatoloski fakultet, pp 247-311
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni članak
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 20.11.2013.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka