Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:4
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:3
članak: 3 od 7  
Back povratak na rezultate
Ekonomski horizonti
2017, vol. 19, br. 1, str. 17-30
jezik rada: srpski, engleski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
doi:10.5937/ekonhor1701017P


Bihevioralni modeli u ekonomiji kao okvir individualnog prilagođavanja institucionalnoj sredini
Univerzitet u Nišu, Ekonomski fakultet

Sažetak

Bihevioralni modeli predstavljaju koristan instrument analize međuzavisnih uticaja institucionalne strukture i makroekonomskih tokova. Njihova uloga, između ostalog, ogleda se u predočavanju prednosti i nedostataka različitih interpretacija ekonomske realnosti, povezanih sa subjektivnim predstavama o mogućnostima adaptacije ekonomskih aktera zahtevima postojeće institucionalne strukture. Imajući u vidu da je poces donošenja ekonomskih odluka integralni deo makroekonomske i šire socijalne ontologije, kao i različita mišljenja u vezi sa osnovnim obeležjima bihevioralnih modela, ovaj rad usmeren je na pokušaj utvrđivanja njihove teorijske relevantnosti i praktične zasnovanosti. Posebna pažnja posvećena je fenomenu realističnosti bihevioralnih modela, s ciljem da se sagleda njihov instrumentalistički značaj za sprovođenje politike asimetričnog paternalizma u uslovima neizvesnosti.

Ključne reči

Reference

Blaug, M. (1992) The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Second Edition
Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G. (2004) Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. u: Camerer C.F.; Loewenstein G.; Rabin M. [ur.] Advances in Behavioral Economics, New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 3-51
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O`Donoghue, T., Rabin, M. (2003) Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for 'Asymmetric Paternalism'. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3): 1211
Dobusch, L., Kapeller, J. (2012) Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4): 1035-1058
Dow, S.C. (2008) Plurality in orthodox and heterodox economics. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 1(2); 73-96
Druckman, J.N. (2001) Evaluating framing effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(1): 91-101
Dugger, W.M. (1979) Methodological Differences between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 13(4): 899-909
Hodgson, G.M. (1988) Economics and institutions: A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge: Polity Press
Kahneman, D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93(5): 1449-1475
Kahneman, D. (2003) A Psychological Perspective on Economics. American Economic Review, 93(2): 162-168
Kapeliushnikov, R. (2015) Behavioral economics and the 'new’ paternalism1. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(1): 81-107
Lawson, T. (2015) Essays on the nature and state of modern economics. London, UK: Routledge
Likhachev, M.O. (2013) Ontological problems of modern macroeconomics. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(6); 788-794
Marković, I., Petrović, D. (2016) Međunarodna ekonomska integracija - efekti i izazovi članstva. u: Leković V. [ur.] Institucionalne promene kao determinanta privrednog razvoja Republike Srbije, Kragujevac, Republika Srbija: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, str. 157-173
Mekfaden, D. (2003) Racionalnost za ekonomiste?. Ekonomski anali, vol. 44, br. 156, str. 169-202
Milićević, A., Pavličić, D., Kostić, A. (2007) Odlučivanje u uslovima rizika i teorija izgleda. Psihologija, vol. 40, br. 1, str. 147-164
O`Donoghue, T., Rabin, M. (2003) Studying Optimal Paternalism, Illustrated by a Model of Sin Taxes. American Economic Review, 93(2): 186-191
Olejnik, A. (1999) Institucionalna ëkonomika: Norma kak bazovyj element institutov: Normi: Rezultat racionalnogo vybora ili absloljutnyj determinant dejstvija?. Voprosy ënomiki, Tema 2, Lekcija 3, 2, 137-156
Petrović, D. (2014) Behavioral analysis of economic choice: Contribution to improving economic rationality. Facta universitatis - series: Economics and Organization, vol. 11, br. 3, str. 191-205
Petrović, D. (2015) Behavioral economics: The new approach to designing the paternalistic role of the state in the economy. Teme, vol. 39, br. 2, str. 345-360
Rizzo, M.J., Whitman, D.G. (2009) The knowledge problem of new paternalism. BYU Law Review, 904-968; 4
Samuels, W.J. (1998) Methodological pluralism. u: Davis J.; Hands Wade D.; Mäki U.I. [ur.] The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 300-303
Simon, H.A. (1992) Methodological foundations of economics. u: Auspitz Lee J.; and other [ur.] Praxiologies and the Philosophy of Economics (Series Praxiology), pp. 25-42
Smith, V. (2005) Behavioral economics research and the foundations of economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(2); 135-50
Stefanović, Z. (2016) Savremena ekonomska misao - ortodoksni i heterodoksni pravci. Niš, Republika Srbija: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu
Sunstein, C.R., Thaler, R. (2003) Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4); 1159-1202
Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven-London, UK: Yale University Press
Wright, D.J., Ginsburg, D.H. (2012) Behavioral law and economics: Its origins, fatal flaws and implications for liberty. Northwestern University Law Review, 106(3); 1033-1089
Zwirn, G. (2007) Methodological Individualism or Methodological Atomism: The Case of Friedrich Hayek. History of Political Economy, 39(1): 47-80