Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:27
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:8
article: 3 from 14  
Back back to result list
Fizička kultura
2017, vol. 71, iss. 2, pp. 99-110
article language: Serbian, English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
doi:10.5937/fizkul1702099K

Creative Commons License 4.0
Intra-session and inter-session reliability of electromyography in leg extension during maximum voluntary isometric contractions of quadriceps: The effect of knee angle
aPolicija Abu Dabija, Odjeljenje za strateški menadžment i poboljšanje performansi, Ujedinjeni Arapski Emirati
bProfeks - Akademija zdravog života, Beograd
cUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Sports and Physical Education

e-mail: filip.kukic@hotmail.com

Project

Effects of the Applied Physical Activity to Locomotor, Metabolic, Psycho-Social and Educational Status of the Population of the Republic of Serbia (MESTD - 47015)
Application of biomedical engineering for preclinical and clinical practice (MESTD - 41007)

Abstract

Numerous factors can influence the reliability of the signal obtained by electromyography EMG among which the type of contraction is practically fundamental. This study aimed to investigate intra- and inter-session reliability of EMG for maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors at different joint angles. Nine healthy male students from the Faculty of Sport and Physical Education voluntarily joined the experiment. Main characteristics of the subjects were: age 23±1 years, body weight 80.8±7.8 kg and body height 182±7 cm. EMG signal from three surface heads of quadriceps femoris was recorded - vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and rectus femoris (RF). Subjects had to perform 3 MVIC as fast as possible, as strong as possible at 6 different knee joint angles on 2 occasions separated by 7-8 days. The intra-class coefficient of correlation (ICC) was used to identify relative intra- and inter-session reliability, while standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to calculate the absolute reliability of each tested muscle. All muscles showed high intra-session reliability (ICC=0.488-0.988 and SEM=1.38-11.35). VL showed good inter-session reliability for most of the conditions (ICC=0.603-0.948), VM for two knee angles (ICC120°=0.764 and ICC130°=0.788), RF was not reliable for any knee angle. This study indicates that RF does not need to be used in EMG testing in leg extension MVIC due to lack of reliability between two sessions, and If EMG RMS from VL and VM will be tested, knee angle of 120° should be used for the testing.

Keywords

testing; between-day; within-day; repeatability

References

Article uploaded retrospectively: references checking, normalizing and linking in progress.
Ball, N., & Scurr, J. (2010). An assessment of the reliability and standardisation of tests used to elicit reference muscular actions for electromyographical normalisation. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20(1), 81-88.
Burden, A. (2010). How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20(6), 1023-1035.
Burnett, A., Green, J., Netto, K., & Rodrigues, J. (2007). Examination of EMG normalisation methods for the study of the posterior and posterolateral neck muscles in healthy controls. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 17(5), 635-641.
Campy, R. M., Coelho, A. J., & Pincivero, D. M. (2009). EMG-torque relationship and reliability of the medial and lateral hamstring muscles. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(11), 2064-2071.
Dankaerts, W., O’Sullivan, P. B., Burnett, A. F., Straker, L. M., & Danneels, L. A. (2004). Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14(3), 333-342.
De Luca, C. J. (1997). The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 13(2), 135-163.
De Luca, C. J. (2002). Surface electromyography: Detection and recording. DelSys Incorporated, 10.
Enoka, R. M., & Duchateau, J. (2015). Inappropriate interpretation of surface EMG signals and muscle fiber characteristics impedes understanding of the control of neuromuscular function. Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(12), 1516-8.
Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M. (2014). The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(11), 1215-1230.
Fauth, M. L., Petushek, E. J., Feldmann, C. R., Hsu, B. E., Garceau, L. R., Lutsch, B. N., & Ebben, W. P. (2010). Reliability of surface electromyography during maximal voluntary isometric contractions, jump landings, and cutting. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(4), 1131-1137.
Gandevia, S. C., & McKenzie, D. K. (1988). Activation of human muscles at short muscle lengths during maximal static efforts. The Journal of Physiology, 407(1), 599-613.
Hopkins, W. (2000). Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1-15).
Larsson, B., Karlsson, S., Eriksson, M., & Gerdle, B. (2003). Test-retest reliability of EMG and peak torque during repetitive maximum concentric knee extensions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13(3), 281-287.
Larsson, B., Månsson, B., Karlberg, C., Syvertsson, P., Elert, J., & Gerdle, B. (1999). Reproducibility of surface EMG variables and peak torque during three sets of ten dynamic contractions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 9(5), 351-357.
Mathur, S., Eng, J. J., & MacIntyre, D. L. (2005). Reliability of surface EMG during sustained contractions of the quadriceps. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 15(1), 102-110.
McGinty, G., Irrgang, J. J., & Pezzullo, D. (2000). Biomechanical considerations for rehabilitation of the knee. Clinical biomechanics, 15(3), 160-166.
Merletti, R., & Di Torino, P. (1999). Standards for reporting EMG data. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 9(1), 3-4.
Mirka, G. A. (1991). The quantification of EMG normalization error. Ergonomics, 34(3), 343-352.
Rainoldi, A., Bullock-Saxton, J. E., Cavarretta, F., & Hogan, N. (2001). Repeatability of maximal voluntary force and of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contraction of quadriceps muscles in healthy subjects. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 11(6), 425-438.
Smith, A. J., Flaxman, T. E., Speirs, A. D., & Benoit, D. L. (2012). Reliability of knee joint muscle activity during weight bearing force control. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22(6), 914-922.
Smoliga, J. M., Myers, J. B., Redfern, M. S., & Lephart, S. M. (2010). Reliability and precision of EMG in leg, torso, and arm muscles during running. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20(1), e1-e9.
Stensdotter, A. K., Hodges, P., Mellor, R., Sundelin, G., & Häger-Ross, C. (2003). Quadriceps activation in closed and in open kinetic chain exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(12), 2043-2047.
Wang, L., & Buchanan, T. S. (2002). Prediction of joint moments using a neural network model of muscle activations from EMG signals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10(1), 30-37.
Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 19(1), 231-240.
Worrell, T. W., Crisp, E., & Larosa, C. (1998). Electromyographic reliability and analysis of selected lower extremity muscles during lateral step-up conditions. Journal of Athletic Training, 33(2), 156-162.