Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:9
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:4
article: 10 from 13  
Back back to result list
Fizička kultura
2018, vol. 72, iss. 1, pp. 96-101
article language: English, Serbian
document type: Professional Paper

Creative Commons License 4.0
Prediction model of influence of force on land and performance in fin swimming: A pilot study
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Aquatic Sports, Athens, Greece



The purpose of this research is the determination of a prediction model that could predict 50m and 100m n swimming results on surface. The sample of this research consisted of 9 n swimmers of competitive level. All participants swam 50 and 100 meters on the water surface with monofin and a snorkel with maximum intensity. In two next sessions, force of the leg extensors and ankle extensors were measured in the workout gym with a dynamometer. The results of this study concluded in a potential statistical significance of regression analysis for 50m fin swimming with snorkel on the surface of the water. Relative force values of ankle and leg extensors are better predictors of 50m fin swimming. No similar results were found for 100m fin swimming. These findings probably suggest that in shorter distance of 50m fin swimming, force variables of extensor muscles play a greater role in comparison to longer distance of 100m n swimming. The measurement of force of legs in n swimming is of particular interest because legs are mostly responsible for the propulsion in fin swimming and should further be studied with other force protocols, different exercises and larger sample.


mesurament in swimming; dynamometry; monofin; prediction model


Newly uploaded article: references checking, normalizing and linking in progress.
Bideau, B., Colobert, B., Fusco, N., Cretual, A., Multon, F., & Delamarche, P. (2002). How to Compute the Mechanical Parameters of Monons. Proceedings of Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. (pp. 505-510). Saint-Etienne, France.
Dopsaj, M., Matković, I., & Zdravković, I. (2000b). The relationship between 50m - freestyle results and characteristics of tethered forces in male sprint swimmers: A new approach to tethered swimming test. Facta Universitatis Series: Physical Education and Sport, 1(7), 15-22.
Dopsaj, M., Thanopoulos, V., Vojko, R., & Tomislav, O. (2004). The relationship between between competitive fitness levels in top sprinters swimmers at 50 and 100 m. freestyle and indicators of explosiveness of different muscle groups: A result prediction model.4th International Conference on Strength Training. Book of Abstracts (pp 153-154). Series, Greece.
Gautier, J., Baly, L., Zanone, P. G., & Watier, B. (2004). Effect of practice level and race distance on Kinematics parameters in n swimming. Science & Sports, 3,91-95.
Nakashima, M., Suzuki, S., & Nakajima, K. (2010). Development of a simulation model for monofin swimming. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 5(4), 408-420.
Pendergast, D. R., Tedesco, M., Nawrocki, D. M., & Fisher, N. M. (1996). Energetics of underwater swimming with SCUBA. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28, 573-580.
Popov, F.P. (1982). Preparation of high class sailors (Translation Vourna A.) Athens: EOUDA.
Rejman, M. (2013). Analysis of relationships between the level of errors in leg and monofin movement and stroke parameters in monon swimming. Journal of sports science and medicine, 12, 171-181.
Rejman, M., Klarowicz, A., & Zaton, K. (2012). An evaluation of kinesthetic differentiation ability in monofin swimmers. Human movement, 13(1), 8-15.
Sanders R. H., Cappaert J. M., Devlin R. K. (1995) Wave characteristics of buttery swimming. Journal of Biomechanics 28, 9-16.
Tamura H., Nakazawa Y., Sugiyama Y., Nomura T., Torii N. (2002) Motion analysis and shape evaluation swimming monofin. : The Engineering of Sport.
Ujihashi S., Haake S.J., editors. Blackwell Science, Vol. 4, 716-724
Ungerechts B. E. (1982) A comparison of the movements of the rear parts of dolphins and buttery swimmers (215-221). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Hollander A. P., Champaign, Human Kinetics,
Videler, J. (1981). Swimming movement, body structure and propulsion. Cod Gadusmorhua, Symposia of the Zoological Society of the London, 48,1-27.
Zammartini, S. (1986). Swimming Training Technique (Translation by Liulias A.) Athens: EOUDA.
Zamparo, P., Prendergast, D. R., Termin, B. & Minetti, A. E. (2002). How fins affect the economy and efficiency of human swimming. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 2665-2676.