• citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:7
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:5


article: 1 from 10  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 8, iss. 16, pp. 15-37
From the 1857 introduction to the 1867 preface: Reflections on Marx's method in the critique of political economy
University of Lancaster, United Kingdom
Keywords: Capital; cell form; cell theory; commodity; method of presentation; method of research; money; natural sciences; starting point
Marx noted in the Preface to the 1867 edition of Capital that beginning is difficult in all sciences. His work on this text reflected Marx and Engels's view that there was only one science: history, embracing nature and society. Unsurprisingly, the natural sciences shaped their work in important ways. My article notes the impact of Darwinism, thermodynamics and cell biology in Marx's analyses and examines the third of these in detail. When Marx eventually settled on the value-form of the commodity as his starting point in Capital, he described it as the economic cell form of the capitalist mode of production. This reflected a new step in his critique of political economy. For, in contrast to his account of two previous methods of political economy outlined in the 1857 Introduction, his subsequent interest in cell biology suggested a third method that would sub-late and supersede them. The commodity provided the simplest, most apparent, and most immediate elementary unit of the capital relation and would serve both as a presupposition in his analysis and its eventual posit (result) as the analysis unfolded all its contradictory and dynamic implications for the logic of capital. This reflects his re -reading of Hegel's Science of Logic, which was also concerned with the choice of starting point in exploring an organic totality. The cell analogy was useful as Marx sought the best starting point for his critique. In this context, I identify six parallels between cell biology and Marx's analysis of the capitalist mode of production that might have influenced his starting point and subsequent analysis. But they remain analogies and guided neither his substantive research nor its presentation, which reflects the historical specificities of the capital relation. The article ends with some general conclusions on discovery, methods, and the method of presentation.
Antonio, de P.J., da Gama, C.H.E. A., Mendes, C.A., Suprinyak, C.E., Gomes, de D.L., Albuquerque, E.da M.e (2013) Notes on a Crisis: The Exzerpthefte and Marx's Method of Research and Composition. Review of Radical Political Economics, 45(2): 162-182
Arthur, C.J. (2004) The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill
Beamish, R. (1992) Marx, Method, and the Division of Labor. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
Bechtel, W. (2006) Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press
Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Smithsonian Institution
Dussel, E. (1990) El ultimo Marx, y la liberacion latinamericana. Mexico, DF: Siglo XXI, 1863-1882
Engels, F. (1990) Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. MECW, 353-398; 26
Florkin, M. (1960) Naissance et deviation de la theorie cellulaire dans l'oeuvre de Th. Schwann. Paris, France: Hermann
Foster, J.B. (2000) Marx's Ecology. New York: Monthly Review Press
Foster, J.B. (2013) Marx and the Rift in the Universal Metabolism of Nature. Monthly Review, 65(7): 1
Frobert, L. (2011) Théorie cellulaire, science économique et République dans l'?uvre de François-Vincent Raspail autour de 1830. Revue d'histoire des sciences, 64(1): 27
Germer, C.M. (2001) The abstract concrete relation in the method of political economy. copejournal. Com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Germer-The-Abstract-Concrete-Relation-in-the-Method-of-Political-Economy-2001. pdf (last accessed 20. 12. 2018)
Gregory, F. (1997) Scientific materialism in nineteenth century Germany. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
Haeckel, E. (1868) Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte. Berlin, Germany: Georg Reimer
Haeckel, E. (1874) Anthropogenie. Leipzig, Saxony: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1st ed
Haeckel, E.H.P.A. (1877) Anthropogenie; oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des menschen, Keimes- und stammesgeschichte, von Ernst Haeckel. Mit 15 tafeln, 330 holzschnitten und 44 genetischen tabellen. Leipzig: Smithsonian Institution
Hanzel, I. (2014) The Circular Course of Our Representation': 'Schein', 'Grund' and 'Erscheinung' in Marx's Economic Works. in: Moseley Fred, Smith Tony [ed.] Marx's Capital and Hegel's Logic: A Reexamination, Brill, 214-239
Hanzel, I. (2015) Marx's Methods of Theory Construction: Categories, Magnitudes, and Variations of Sizes of Magnitudes under Certain Idealizations. International Critical Thought, 5(4): 413-438
Harris, H. (1999) The Birth of the Cell. New Haven: Yale University Press
Hegel, G.W.F. (1816) Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, trans
Hegel, G.W.F. (1998) Hegel's Science of Logic. Amherst, NY: Humanity Press, trans. A. V. Miller <1831> [This is the 'longer' Logic]
Jánoska, J., Bondeli, M., Kindle, K., Hofer, M. (1994) Das 'Methodenkapitel' von Karl Marx. Ein historischer und systematischer Kommentar. Basel: Schwabe and Co
Jessop, B. (2011) Rethinking the diversity and varieties of capitalism: on variegated capitalism in the world market. in: Wood Geoffrey [ed.] Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism, London: Routledge, pp. 209-37
Jessop, B. (2018) Every beginning is difficult, holds in all sciences: Marx on the economic cell form of the capitalist mode of production. Consecutio Rerum, 2(2): 00-00
Jessop, B. (1983) Accumulation strategies, state forms, and hegemonic projects. Kapitalistate, 89-111; 10
Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK: Polity
Klein, M. (1981) Francois-Vincent Raspail. in: Gillispie C.C. [ed.] Dictionary of Scientific Biography, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, vol. 11 ( pp. 300-302)
Kolliker, A. (1852) Gewebelehre des Menschen fur Aerzte und Studierende. Leipzig, Saxony: Wilhelm Engelmann
Maehle, A.H. (2011) Ambiguous cells: the emergence of the stem cell concept in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 65(4): 359-378
Marsden, R. (1998) The unknown masterpiece: Marx's model of capital. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(3): 297-324
Marsden, R. (1999) The Nature of Capital: Marx after Foucault. Informa UK Limited
Marx, K. (1975) Marginal notes on Adolf Wagner's Lehrbuch der politischen Oekonomie. 24, 531-559. <1879-80>
Marx, K. (1986) Introduction. 28, 17-48
Marx, K. (1986) Outlines of the critique of political economy. (Rough draft of 1857-58) [First Instalment], 28, 49-537
Marx, K. (1998) Capital. volume 3., 37. <1895>
Marx, K. (1983) MEGA2 II. 5 Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Okonomie, Erster Band. Hamburg: Dietz Verlag
Marx, K. (1987) From the preparatory materials. 29, 420-532
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1975) The German Ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart, vol. 5 ( pp. 19-539)
Marx, K. (1989) Results of the direct production process. Chapter 6., 34, 354- 466. <1864>
Marx, K. (1989) Economic manuscript of 1861-63. [Continuation], 32
Marx, K. (1996) Capital. volume 1., 35. <1883>
Marx, K. (1987) Contribution to the critique of political economy. 29, 266-417. <1859>
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1988) Letters 1856 - 59. 40
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1988) Letters 1868 - 70. 43
McCarthy, G.E. (1988) Marx' Critique of Science and Positivism: The Methodological Foundations of Political Economy. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Mitchell, I. (1978) Marxism and German scientific materialism. Annals of Science, 35(4): 379-400
Moseley, F., Smith, T., ur. (2014) Marx's Capital and Hegel's Logic: A Reexamination. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill
Moseley, F. (2002) Hostile Brothers: Marx's theory of the distribution of surplus-value in Volume 3 of Capital. in: Campbell Martha, Reuten Geert [ed.] The Culmination of Capital, London: Springer Nature, 65-101
Pepperell, N. (2011) Disassembling capital. University of Sydney, PhD thesis
Postone, M. (2009) Time, labor, and social domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rabinbach, A.G. (1990) Transcendental materialism: the primacy of Arbeitskraft (Labor Power). in: The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Rise of Modernity, New York: Basic Books, pp. 45-68
Ramalho-Santos, M., Willenbring, H. (2007) On the Origin of the Term 'Stem Cell'. Cell Stem Cell, 1(1): 35-38
Raspail, F.V. (1833) Nouveau systeme de chimie organique. Paris, France: Bailliere,
Rosdolsky, R. (1968) Die Enstehungsgeschichte des Marxschen Kapital. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt
Saito, K. (2017) Marx's Ecosocialism: Capitalism, Nature and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press
Sayer, D. (1979) Marx's Method. Ideology, Science and Critique in Capital. Hassocks, England: Harvester Press
Schleiden, M. J., Schwann, T., Smith, H. (1847) Microscopical researches into the accordance in the structure and growth of animals and plants. Tr. from the German of Dr. Th. Schwann ... by Henry Smith ... London: Smithsonian Institution
Sheasby, W.C. (2004) Karl Marx and the Victorians' nature: the evolution of a deeper view: part two: the age of aquaria. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15(3): 59-78
Taylor, N., Bellofiore, R. (2004) Marx's Capital I, the Constitution of Capital: General Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1-34
Virchow, R. (1858) Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer Begrundung auf physiologische und pathologische Gewebenlehre. Berlin, Prussia: Georg Reimer
Virchow, R. (1860) Cellular pathology as based upon physiological and pathological histology. New York: Robert M. De Witt, (English translation of second German edition)
Virchow, R. (1855) Cellular-Pathologie. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, 8(1): 3-39
Wendling, A.E. (2009) Karl Marx on technology and alienation. England, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan


article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/politeia0-20021
published in SCIndeks: 07/03/2019
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0