• citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:9
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:6


article: 7 from 10  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 8, iss. 16, pp. 119-131
European financial network of Islamist terrorism
Independent University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Political Science, Republic of Srpska, B&H
Keywords: Islamist terrorism; Islamist terrorist organisations; terrorism financing; Europe; EU; US
In this paper the author analyses one of the most important aspects of global Islamist terrorism on the territory of Europe - the terrorism financing network. Although Europe has become on of the main targets of Islamist terrorists in recent years, its answer to the rising terrorism threat has, to this day, proven to be mild and ineffective. The same can be said regarding the European security officials' fight against the financial networks of terrorist organisations. While the US, after the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, established the 'Patriot Act', Europe did not follow through, which made it a perfect location for terrorists who were forced to withdraw their funds from America. The absence of a global and homogenous legislation comparable to the American 'Patriot Act' can be partially explained by the fact that Europe does not possess the equivalent of a federal legislation because the degree of the political integration of the European Union members is much weaker than that of the American states. The lack of homogeneity of the European structures has allowed members of terrorist organisations to take advantage of gaps that exist in the local legislation of every country. Apart from the fact that the EU does not have a common set of anti-terrorism laws, its problem also lays in the fact that liberal- democratic European political elites place too much emphasis on the notion of human rights, which is, in fact, crippling their security forces and making it very hard for them to properly investigate individuals and organisations suspected of financing terrorist activities.
Acharya, A. (2009) Targeting Terrorist Financing: international cooperation and new regimes. New York: Routledge
Burr, J.M., Collins, O.R. (2006) Alms for Jihad: Charity and Terrorism in the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ehrenfeld, R. (2005) Funding Evil - How terrorism is financed - and how to stop it. Chicago: Bonus Books
Gohel, S. (2016) The challenges of EU counter-terrorism cooperation. Security Europe.
Ionesku, I. (2015) Financing terrorism: From offshore companies to the charity paradox. SEA - Practical Application of Science, Vol. 3. Issue 2 (8)
Keatinge, T. (2014) Finances of the Jihad: How extremists groups raise money. BBC,
Levitt, M. (2002) The Political Economy of Middle East Terrorism. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 6:4
Mackay, N. (2004) Was it ETA or al Qaeda?, The confusion over who was behind the Madrid bombing obscures intelligence predictions of an enhanced terror threat. Sunday Herald
Meotti, G. (2017) Europe funds its own bloodbath. Arutz Sheva,
Naim, M. (2005) Illicit-how smugglers, traffickers, and copycats are highjacking the global economy. New York: Anchor Books
Napoleoni, L. (2004) Terror Inc: Tracing the Money behind Global Terrorism. London: Penguin books
Ryder, N. (2015) The Financial War on Terrorism - A review of counter-terrorist strategies since 2001. London-New York: Routhledge
Smith, J., Filipiak, N. (2007) Islamic charities in Europe. Washington, DC: Centre for Strategic and International Studies
Tierney, M. (2017) Well funded and dangerous: assessing the Islamic State's financing operations. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 20(2): 159-171
Vukoičić, J. (2016) Economics of Political Violence: The Role of Islamic Charities in the Global Terrorism Financing. Belgrade, Vol 2
Vukoičić, J., Rodić, G. (2016) Financing of Terrorism in Europe. Evropske integracije. Tara, Tom 2


article language: English
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/politeia0-17150
published in SCIndeks: 07/03/2019
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records