Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[2]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:21
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11

Sadržaj

članak: 3 od 7  
Back povratak na rezultate
2020, vol. 68, br. 1, str. 28-64
Višekriterijumski BWM-COPRAS model za izbor optimalnog terenskog vozila za prevoz putnika
Univerzitet odbrane, Vojna akademija, Beograd

e-adresadragan.pamucar@va.mod.gov.rs, lazarsavin96@gmail.com
Ključne reči: BWM; COPRAS; MABAC; MAIRCA; izbor vozila; donošenje višekriterijumskih odluka
Sažetak
Uvod/cilj: Adekvatna evaluacija i izbor terenskog vozila za izvršenje različitih vrsta zadataka veoma je važan faktor koji utiče na mobilnost korisnika, njihovu bezbednost, kao i na kvalitet i efikasnost izvršavanja transportnih aktivnosti u Vojsci Srbije (VS). Metode: Stoga je za izbor optimalnog terenskog vozila za potrebe VS, u ovom radu predložen BWM (Best Worst Method) i COPRAS (Compressed Proportional Assessment) model . Određivanje relativnih težina kriterijuma, na osnovu kojih se vrši vrednovanje potencijalnih terenskih vozila, izvršeno je primenom BWM metode. Pored COPRAS metode, koja je sastavni deo osnovnog modela za donošenje odluke, u ovom radu su, kroz validaciju rezultata, primenjene i metode MABAC (MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison) i MAIRCA (MultiAtributive IdealReal Comparative Analysis). Rezultati: Testiranjem BWM-COPRAS modela na primeru izbora optimalnog terenskog vozila u VS dobijena je visoka korelacija rangova. Validacija rezultata izvršena je statističkom obradom rezultata dobijenih različitim višekriterijumskim tehnikama, primenom Spirmanovog koeficijenta korelacije. Zaključak: Rezultati pokazuju stabilnost rezultata predloženog modela u rangiranju alternativa i dokazuju njegovu primenjivost za rešavanje višekriterijumskih problema.
Reference
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S. (2012) A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(2): 573-584
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., Omrani, H. (2011) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10): 12270-12280
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S. (2011) Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(6): 787-796
Badi, I., Ballem, M. (2018) Supplier Selection using Rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in Pharmaceutical Supplying in Libya. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2): 21-21, https://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/12/11
Badi, I.A., Abdulshahed, A.M., Shetwan, A.G. (2018) A Case Study of Supplier Selection for A Steelmaking Company in Libya by Using the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) Model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1): 01-12
Barić, D., Pilko, H., Strujić, J. (2016) An Analytic Hierarchy Process Model to Evaluate Road Section Design. Transport, 31(3): 312-321
Bojković, N., Anić, I.R., Pejčić-Tarle, S. (2010) One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method. Ecological Economics, vol. 69, br. 5, str. 1176-1186
Cadena, P.C.B., Magro, J.M.V. (2015) Setting the Weights of Sustainability Criteria for the Appraisal of Transport Projects. Transport, 30(3), pp.298-306
Castillo, H., Pitfield, D.E. (2010) ELASTIC: A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(4), pp.179-188
Chatterjee, K., Pamucar, D., Zavadskas, E.K. (2018) Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184(2): 101-129
Dimić, S., Pamučar, D., Ljubojević, S., Đorović, B. (2016) Strategic Transport Management Models: The Case Study of an Oil Industry. Sustainability, 8(9): 954
Fazlollahtabar, H. (2018) Operations and inspection Cost minimization for a reverse supply chain. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp.91-107 [online]. Available at: http://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/8/8. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A., Stević, Ž. (2019) FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1): 49-65, https://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/26/24
Inti, S., Tandon, V. (2017) Application of Fuzzy Preference-Analytic Hierarchy Process Logic in Evaluating Sustainability of Transportation Infrastructure Requiring Multicriteria Decision Making. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(4): 04017014-04017014
Jeon, C.M., Amekudzi, A.A., Guensler, R.L. (2010) Evaluating Plan Alternatives for Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4(4): 227-247
Jiang, P., Hu, Y., Yen, G., Jiang, H., Chiu, Y. (2018) Using a Novel Grey DANP Model to Identify Interactions between Manufacturing and Logistics Industries in China. Sustainability, 10(10): 3456-3456
Jones, S., Tefe, M., Appiah-Opoku, S. (2013) Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, pp.21-34
Kahraman, Y.R. (2002) Robust sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute deterministic hierarchical value models. Ohio: Storming Media
Kirkwood, C.W. (1997) Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(1): 93-98
López, E., Monzón, A. (2010) Integration of Sustainability Issues in Strategic Transportation Planning: A Multi-criteria Model for the Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(6): 440-451
Mavi, R.K., Goh, M., Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017) Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5-8): 2401-2418
Mitropoulos, L.K., Prevedouros, P.D. (2016) Incorporating sustainability assessment in transportation planning: An urban transportation vehicle-based approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 39(5): 439-463
Mukhametzyanov, I., Pamučar, D. (2018) A Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2): 51-80, [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/14/14. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Noureddine, M., Ristić, M. (2019) Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multicriteria decision making approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp.66-85 [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/29/25. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Nunić, Z. (2018) Evaluation and selection of the PVC carpentry manufacturer using the FUCOM-MABAC model. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp.13-28 [online]. Available at: https://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/3/3. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Pamučar, D., Sremac, S., Stević, Ž., Ćirović, G., Tomić, D. (2019) New multi-criteria LNN WASPAS model for evaluating the work of advisors in the transport of hazardous goods. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(9), pp.5045-5068
Pamučar, D., Lukovac, V., Božanić, D., Komazec, N. (2018) Multi-criteria FUCOM-MAIRCA model for the evaluation of level crossings: Case study in the Republic of Serbia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp.108-129 [online]. Available at: http://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/10/9. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Pamučar, D., Lukovac, V., Pejčić-Tarle, S. (2013) Application of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system in the process of transportation support. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 30(02): 1250053
Pamučar, D., Pejčić-Tarle, S., Parezanović, T. (2018) New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: Sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre. Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1): 1641-1665
Pamučar, D., Vasin, L., Atanasković, P., Miličić, M. (2016) Planning the City Logistics Terminal Location by Applying the Green p-Median Model and Type-2 Neurofuzzy Network. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016: 1-15
Pamučar, D., Badi, I., Korica, S., Obradović, R. (2018) A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya. Energies, 11(9): 2489-2489
Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015) The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6): 3016-3028
Puška, A., Maksimović, A., Stojanović, I. (2018) Improving organizational learning by sharing information through innovative supply chain in agro-food companies from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp.76-90 [online]. Available at: http://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/7/7. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Radović, D., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Zavadskas, E., Badi, I., Antuchevičiene, J., Turskis, Z. (2018) Measuring Performance in Transportation Companies in Developing Countries: A Novel Rough ARAS Model. Symmetry, 10(10), p.434
Rao, C., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., Zheng, J. (2015) Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, pp.29-44
Rezaei, J. (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53: 49-57
Safaeimohamadabadi, H., Tichkowsky, G., Kumar, A. (2009) Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles. Energy, 34(1): 112-125
Simongáti, G. (2010) Multi-Criteria Decision Making Support Tool for Freight Integrators: Selecting the Most Sustainable Alternative. Transport, 25(1), pp.89-97
Sremac, S., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Arsić, M., Matić, B. (2018) Evaluation of a Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Using a Rough SWARA-WASPAS Model Based on a New Rough Dombi Agregator. Symmetry, 10(8), p.305
Stanković, M., Gladović, P., Popović, V. (2019) Determining the importance of the criteria of traffic accessibility using fuzzy AHP and rough AHP method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp.86-104 [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/27/26. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D. (2018) An extension of the WASPAS method for decision-making problems with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers: A case of website evaluation. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp.29-39 [online]. Available at: http://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/4/4. [Accessed: 21 August 2019]
Starčević, S., Bojović, N., Skrickij, V., Junevičius, R. (2019) AHP method and data envelopment analysis application in terrain vehicle selection for the purposes of military units engagement in multinational operations. Transport, in press
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Kazimieras, Z.E., Ćirović, G., Prentkovskis, O. (2017) The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods. Symmetry, 9(11): 264-264
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Subotić, M., Antuchevičiene, J., Zavadskas, E.K. (2018) The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator. Sustainability, 10(8): 2817-2817
Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K. (2010) A New Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment Method (Aras-F): Case Study: The Analysis of Fuzzy Multiple Criteria in Order to Select the Logistic Centers Location. Transport, 25(4): 423-432
Wang, H., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y. (2018) An integrated MCDM approach considering demands-matching for reverse logistics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, pp.199-210
Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996) Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Buildings. Vilnius: Technika, (in Lithuanian)
Zečević, S., Tadić, S., Krstić, M. (2017) Intermodal Transport Terminal Location Selection Using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 25(06), pp.853-876
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/vojtehg68-22916
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.02.2020.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci