Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:7
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5

Sadržaj

članak: 8 od 10  
Back povratak na rezultate
2021, vol. 3, br. 2, str. 149-168
Investiciona arbitraža i problem najpovlašćenije nacije - trnovit put od odluke Mafezini do slučaja Ičkale
United Nations Development Program (Serbia), Belgrade

e-adresauros.zivkovic@tackapovratka.rs
Ključne reči: investiciona arbitraža; MFN; BIT; Maffezini
Sažetak
Interpretacija klauzule najpovlašćenije nacije (MFN) u investicionoj arbitraži u fokusu je doktrinarne debate već duže od dve decenije. Ovaj rad istražuje pitanje tumačenja ove klauzule iz dva potpuno drugačija ugla - širokog pristupa zastupljenog u odluci arbitraže u slučaju Mafezini i novijeg, restriktivnog pristupa koji je primenio tribunal u Ičkale arbitražnom slučaju, sa ciljem da se, u najširim crtama, prikaže kako je moguće uspostaviti balansirani mehanizam u tumačenju ove sporne odredbe međunarodnog sporazuma o zaštiti stranih ulaganja.
Reference
Acconci, P. (2008) Most-Favored-Nation Treatment. u: Muchlinski Peter ; Ortino Federico ;Schreuer Christoph [ur.] The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford
Bagwellm, K., Staiger, R.W. (2004) Multilateral trade negotiations, bilateral opportunism and the rules of GATT/WTO. Journal of International Economics, 63(1)
Banifatemi, Y. (2008) The Emerging Jurisprudence on the Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in Investment Arbitration. u: Bjorklund A. K. ;Laird I. A. ; Ripinsky S. [ur.] Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues III: Remedies in International Investment Law: Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law, London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law
Batifort, S., Heath, J.B. (2016) The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization. American Journal of International Law, 111(4)
Dolzer, R., Schreuer, C. (2012) Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford
Douglas, Z. (2011) The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1)
Douglas, Z. (2009) The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge
Fietta, S. (2005) Most Favored Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point?. International Arbitration Law Review, (4)
Freyer, D.H., Herlihy, D. (2005) Most-Favored-Nation Treatment and Dispute Settlement in Investment Arbitration: Just How 'Favored' is 'Most-Favored'?. ICSID Review -Foreign Investment Law Journal, 20(1)
Gaillard, E. (2005) Establishing Jurisdiction Through a Most-Favored-Nation Clause. New York Law Journal, 233(105)
Mann, H., von Moltke, K., Peterson, L.E., Cosbey, A. (2006) IISD Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development: Negotiators' Handbook. Winnipeg
Maupin, J.A. (2011) MFN-based Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration: Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?. Journal of International Economic Law, 14(1)
Molinuevo, M. (2011) Post-establishment MFN and NT Obligations. u: Molinuevo Martin [ur.] Protecting Investment in Services: Investor-State Arbitration versus WTO dispute Settlement, The Hague: Global Trade Law Series, 38
Newcombe, A., Paradell, L. (2009) Chapter V -Most-Favored-Nation Treatment. u: Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment, The Hague
Pellet, A. (2013) The Case Law of the ICJ in Investment Arbitration. ICSID Review, 28(2)
Schill, S.W. (2009) Multilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27(2)
Schreuer, C. (2004) Travelling the BIT Route of Waiting Periods, Umbrella Clauses and Forks in the Road. Journal of World Investment and Trade
Schwarzenberger, G. (1945) The Most-Favoured Nation Standard in British State Practice. British Yearbook of International Law, 22(96)
Sornarajah, M. (2010) The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge
Subedi, S.P. (2008) International Investment Law -Reconciling Policy and Principle. Oxford-Portland
Titi, C. (2016) Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, Survival Clauses and Reform of International Investment Law. Journal of International Arbitration, 5(33)
Toye, R. (2003) Developing Multilateralism: The Havana Charter and the Fight for the International Trade Organization, 1947-1948. International History Review, XXV. 2
United Nation Conference On Trade And Development Unctad (2010) Most-Favored-Nation Treatment. u: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, Geneva, II
United Nations Conference On Trade And Development Unctad (1999) Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment. u: UNCTAD Series on Issues I International Investment Agreements, New York, I
Ustor, E. (1969) First Report on the Most-Favoured Nation Clause. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2, UN Doc. A/CB.4SERA/1969/Add. 1, New York
van den Bossche, P., Werner, Z.W. (2013) The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization. Cambridge
Vandevelde, K.J. (2010) Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy and Interpretation. New York
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/RKSPP2102149Z
primljen: 12.10.2021.
prihvaćen: 28.10.2021.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 10.12.2021.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka