Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5

Sadržaj

članak: 2 od 15  
Back povratak na rezultate
2019, vol. 12, br. 2, str. 93-108
Modeli finansiranja poljoprivrednog savetodavstva - iskustva Evropske unije
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Poljoprivredni fakultet
bUniverzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, Fakultet za ekonomiju i inženjerski menadžment - FIMEK

e-adresakatarina.djuric@polj.uns.ac.rs, lmirjana@polj.uns.ac.rs, sinisa.skrbic@in-tech.rs, rprodanovic@fimek.edu.rs
Sažetak
Koncept savremene i intenzivne poljoprivredne proizvodnje unapređenje konkurentnosti poljoprivrednih gazdinstava nameće kao jedan od imperativa. Stepen znanja i informisanosti poljoprivrednika jedan je od faktora koji ima presudan uticaj na rast njihove konkurentosti. Upravo zbog toga se u sistemu evropske poljoprivrede naglašava uloga i značaj poljoprivredne savetodavne službe, kao karike koja povezuje istraživački i institucionalni sektor sa poljoprivrednim proizvođačima. Značaj savetodavnog rada u savremenim uslovima opredelio je predmet istraživanja u ovom radu. Primenom istorijskog, deskriptivnog, kao i metoda analize i sinteze, analizirana je poljoprivredna savetodavna služba Evropske unije. Cilj istraživanja je da se analizom poljoprivrednog savetodavstva i načina njenog finansiranja utvrdi na koji način privatizacija i komercijalizacija utiču na kvalitet savetodavnih usluga. Na osnovu uočenih prednosti i ograničenja pojedinih modela finansiranja, u radu su date smernice za organizaciju poljoprivredne savetodavne službe u Republici Srbiji.
Reference
Botha, N., Coutts, J., Roth, H. (2008) The Role of Agricultural Consultants in New Zealand in Environmental Extension. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 14(2): 125-138
Đurić, K., Prodanović, R., Jahić, M. (2017) Komparacija poljoprivrednog savetodavnog sistema Republike Srbije i Evropske unije. Evropsko zakonodavstvo, 60: 209-226
European Commission (2009) Report from the commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Farm Advisory System as defined in Article 12 and 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. Accessible at (11 Mart 2019): http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ
Kania, J., Vinohradnik, K., Tworzyk, A. (2014) Advisory services in agricultural system of knowledge and information in Poland. u: The 11th European IFSA Symposium, Berlin, Germany, Proceedings of, 123-133
Kelly, T., Brady, M., Bolger, P. (2013) Evolution of Advisory Services in Ireland. u: Knowledge Transfer Conference 2013 Future of Farm Advisory Services: Delivering Innovate Systems, Teagasc, Dublin, 16-18
Klerkx, L., Proctor, A. (2012) Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: Networks for knowledge sharing in the English land management advisory system. Land Use Policy, 30(1): 13-24
Labarthe, P., Moumouni, I. (2014) AKIS and advisory services in Belgium: Report for AKIS inventory (WP3) of the PRO AKIS project. Accessible at (13 Mart 2019): www.proakis.eu/publicationsandevents/pubs
Labarthe, P., Laurent, C. (2013) The Importance of the Back-office for Farm Advisory Services. EuroChoices, 12(1): 21-26
Laurent, C., Cerf, M., Labarthe, P. (2006) Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU Countries. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(1): 5-16
Mcgehee, N.G. (2007) An Agritourism Systems Model: A Weberian Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(2): 111-124
Prager, K., Thomson, K. (2014) AKIS in the United Kingdom -an overview of Agricultural Knowledge Systems and farmer advisory services: Project Report for the EU project PRO AKIS. WP3, Accessible at (13 Mart 2019): http://www.proakis.eu/publicationsandevents/pubs
Prager, K., Labarthe, P., Caggiano, M., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. (2016) How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK. Land Use Policy, 52: 329-344
Prager, K., Creaney, R., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. (2017) Criteria for a system level evaluation of farm advisory services. Land Use Policy, 61: 86-98
Rivera, W.R. (2000) Confronting global market: Public sector agricultural extension reconsidered. Journal of Extension Systems, 16: 33-54
Sharma, N., Patterson, P.G. (1999) The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(2): 151-170
Sutherland, L.A., Madureira, L., Dirimanova, V., Bogusz, M., Kania, J., Vinohradnik, K., Creaney, R., Duckett, D., Koehnen, T., Knierim, A. (2017) New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe's periphery. Land Use Policy, 63: 428-439
Sutherland, L.A., Mills, J., Ingram, J., Burton, R.J.F., Dwyer, J., Blackstock, K. (2013) Considering the source: Commercialisation and trust in agri-environmental information and advisory services in England. Journal of Environmental Management, 118: 96-105
Swanson, B.E., Rajalahti, R. (2010) Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory system: Procedures for assessing, transforming and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, World Bank, 45
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: stručni članak
DOI: 10.5937/etp1902093Q
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 15.10.2019.
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Menadž u hotelijerstvu i turiz (2019)
Bibliometrijska analiza Crossref literature na temu agroturizma indeksirane u Web of Science-u
Dimitrovski Darko, i dr.

Industrija (2017)
Uticaj potrošnje opasnih hemikalija na razvoj agroturizma u Srbiji
Matijašević-Obradović Jelena, i dr.