Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:5
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:5

Contents

article: 3 from 8  
Back back to result list
2020, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 97-103
Tools for optimizing the operating conditions of waste-to-energy plant
aBelgrade Polytechnic, College of Vocational Studies, Belgrade
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy

emailslavisa@tmf.bg.ac.rs
Project:
This paper presents the results of Erasmus+ project WamPPP: Waste management curricula development in partnership with public and private sector, /WaMPPP 561821-EPP-1-2015-1-RSEPPKA2-CBHE-JR

Keywords: Waste-to-energy; tools; optimization
Abstract
The efficient use of energy and resources is important from the point of environmental responsibility, but at the same time, it can be an opportunity towards obtaining economic value. Waste-to-energy (WtE) plants have the dual objective first to reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills, and second to generate electricity, heat and biogas. Tracking the flows of energy and materials within WtE system could be convenient optimization tool for waste treatment process. Through modeling and simulation of complex operating systems, it is manageable to present the actual operation states and conditions, and in case of modified operation conditions, possible treatment results. To achieve better operating performances chosen models can analyze, adjust and improve the WtE process in accordance to desired parameters. This paper gives an insight of some of the most adequate tools for modeling of WtE plants.
References
*** Ecoinvent version 3.6. https://www.ecoinvent.org/support/faqs/first-time-users/what-is-thedifference-between-simapro-or-gabi-umbertoopenlca-etc-and-ecoinvent.html (accessed: September 2019.)
*** (2014) Process Optimization in the Chemical Industry. Ifu.com, (accessed: August 2019.)
*** (2004) TWG Comments on Draft 2 on Waste Incineration BREF. TWG Comments
Abeliotis, K. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste management. in: Integrated Waste Management, Chapter, Volume I
Allegrini, E., et al. (2014) Quantification of the resource recovery potential of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ashes. Waste Management, 34(9): 1627-1636
Astrup, T.F., et al. (2015) Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: Review and recommendations. Waste Management, 37: 104-115
Björklund, A., Finnveden, G., Roth, L. (2011) Application of LCA in waste management. in: Christensen T.H. [ed.] Solid Waste Technology & Management, Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Vol. 1. p.137-160
Brunner, P.H., Rechberger, H. (2016) Waste to energy: Key element for sustainable waste management. Energy Conversion and Management, 124: 333-343
Cencic, O., Rechberger, H. (2008) Material flow analysis with software STAN. J Environ. Eng. Manage, 18(1): 3-7
European Commission (2017) The role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy. COM 34 final
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T. (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1): 1-21
Guinée, J.B., et al. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future. Environ. Sci. Technol, 45(1): 90-96
Gupta, A., Bais, A.S. (2016) Waste to energy market size by technology (Biological, Thermal [Incineration, Pyrolysis & Gasification]), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Price Trend, Competitive Market Share & Forecast. Global Market Insights
Huber, F. (2020) Modelling of material recovery from waste incineration bottom ash. Waste Management, 105: 61-72
If Hamburg GmbH (2019) Umberto® product website. http://www.umberto.de/en (accessed: September 2019.)
Kornau, J., Albers, H. (2012) Modeling Waste Characteristics and WtE Plants as a Tool for Optimum Operation Conditions. in: Green Energy and Technology, Chapter, p.83-105
Kyoung-Yun, K.K., et al. (2011) A Conceptual Framework for a Sustainable Product Development Collaboratory. in: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Volume: Paper No. DETC2011-48922, p.1097-1103
Neuwahl, F., et al. (2019) Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Waste Incineration. EUR 29971 EN
Saurat, M., Ritthoff, M. (2015) Overview of existing sustainability assessment methods and tools, and of relevant standards. D1.1, SAMT Project, www.spire2030.eu/samt (accessed: August 2019.)
Saveyn, H., et al. (2016) Towards a better exploitation of the technical potential of waste-toenergy. EUR 28230 EN
Schmidt, A., Hache, B., Herold, F., Götze, U. (2013) Material Flow Cost Accounting with Umberto. in: The 1st and 2nd workshop of the cross-sectional group 1 'Energy related technologic and economic evaluation' of the Cluster of Excellence eniPROD, Wissenschaftliche Scripten, Auerbach, Proceedings of
Wiesen, K., Saurat, M., Lettenmeier, M. (2014) Calculating the Material Input per Service Unit using the Ecoinvent database. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 10(4): 357-366
Yang, W., Nam, H.S., Choi, S. (2007) Improvement of operating conditions in waste incineration using engineering tools. Waste Management, 27, 5, str. 604-613
Zaman, A.Uz. (2009) Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste to Energy Technologies. Global Journal of Environmental Research, 3: 155-163
 

About

article language: English
document type: Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/zasmat2002097A
published in SCIndeks: 15/06/2020
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records