Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:11
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
članak: 1 od 1  
Back povratak na rezultate
Psihološka istraživanja
2018, vol. 21, br. 2, str. 217-227
jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
doi:10.5937/PsiIstra1802217G

Creative Commons License 4.0
Razlike između muškaraca i žena u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Tehnički fakultet 'Mihajlo Pupin', Zrenjanin

e-adresa: djurdja.grijak@gmail.com

Sažetak

Ovo istraživanje je urađeno kako bi se utvrdilo da li postoje razlike u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti s obzirom na pol i starost ispitanika, dužinu braka, zadovoljstvo partnerskim odnosom i zadovoljstvo podrškom partnera. Uzorak su činila 32 bračna para (N=64), prosečne starosti 40 godina. Dužina braka ispitanika bila je od 4 do 33 godine. U istraživanju je korišćena Skala autentičnosti u partnerskim odnosima (Grijak, 2018). Rezultati su pokazali da ne postoje statistički značajne razlike između muškaraca i žena u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti. Međutim, razlike u percepciji partnerove autentičnosti postoje s obzirom na zadovoljstvo partnerskim odnosom muškaraca i s obzirom na starost žena. Muškarci koji su zadovoljniji odnosom s partnerkom i žene starosti između 41 i 49 godina percipiraju svoje partnerke/partnere autentičnijim. Prikazano istraživanje treba da bude doprinos detaljnijem interpersonalnom ispitivanju autentičnosti u partnerskom odnosu i ciljevima partnera u tom odnosu.

Ključne reči

autentičnost u partnerskom odnosu; partnerska povezanost

Reference

Brunell, A.B., Kernis, M.H., Goldman, B.M., Heppner, W., Davis, P., Cascio, E.V., Webster, G.D. (2010) Dispositional authenticity and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8): 900-905
Cole, T. (2001) Lying to the One you Love: The Use of Deception in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(1): 107-129
Cutrona, C.E., Russell, D.W., Gardner, K.A. (2005) The Relationship Enhancement Model of Social Support. u: Revenson Tracey A.; Kayser Karen; Bodenmann Guy [ur.] Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping., Washington: American Psychological Association (APA), 73-95
DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A. (1998) Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1): 63-79
Fincham, F.D., Bradbury, T.N. (1992) Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3): 457-468
Grégoire, S., Baron, L., Ménard, J., Lachance, L. (2014) The Authenticity Scale: Psychometric properties of a French translation and exploration of its relationships with personality and well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 46(3): 346-355
Grijak, Đ. (2017) Psychometric evaluation of the Authenticity Scale on the sample of students in Serbia. Psihologija, vol. 50, br. 1, str. 85-99
Grijak, Đ. (2018) Validacija srpske adaptacije skale autentičnosti u partnerskim odnosima - (AIRS). Primenjena psihologija, 11(1): 89-104
Hodgins, H.S., Knee, C.R. (2002) The integrating self and conscious experience. u: Deci E.L.; Ryan R.M. [ur.] Handbook of self-determination research, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 87-100
Hodgins, H.S., Weibust, K.S., Weinstein, N., Shiffman, S., Miller, A., Coombs, G., Adair, K.C. (2010) The Cost of Self-Protection: Threat Response and Performance as a Function of Autonomous and Controlled Motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8): 1101-1114
İlhan, T., Özdemir, Y. (2013) Adaptation of Authenticity Scale to Turkish: A validity and Reliability Study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(40): 142-153
Kernis, M.H. (2003) Target article: Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1): 1-26
Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., Patrick, H. (2005) Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6): 997-1009
Lopez, F.G., Rice, K.G. (2006) Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3): 362-371
Maslow, A.H. (1968) Toward a psychology of being. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 2nd ed
Metts, S. (1989) An Exploratory Investigation of Deception in Close Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(2): 159-179
Murray, S.L., Holmes, J.G. (2009) The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116(4): 908-928
Neff, K.D., Harter, S. (2002) The authenticity of conflict resolutionsamong adult couples: Does women's other-oriented behavior affect theirtrue selves?. Sex Roles, 47(9/10): 403-417
Peterson, C. (1996) Deception in Intimate Relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 31(6): 279-288
Reis, H.T., Collins, W. A., Berscheid, E. (2000) The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6): 844-872
Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G., Zanna, M.P. (1985) Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1): 95-112
Rogers, C.R. (1961) On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. London: Constable
Shamsi, A., Ghamarani, A., Samadi, M., Ahmadzadeh, M. (2012) The Study Of The Validity And Reliability Of The Authentic Personality Scale. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods, 2(8): 87-99
Snyder, M. (1987) Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman
Wickham, R.E. (2013) Perceived authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5): 878-887
Wood, A.M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., Joseph, S. (2008) The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3): 385-399