- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:4
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
|
|
|
2022, vol. 60, br. 3, str. 447-460
|
|
Primena tehnologije u pravnom kontekstu - primer LegalTech-a
Application of technology in legal context: The case of LegalTech
Projekat: Rad je rezultat istraživanja na projektu "Odgovornost u pravnom i društvenom kontekstu", koji finansira Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu
Sažetak
Tehnologija napreduje eksponencijalno, dok znanje o tehnologiji raste linearno. Iz ovog razloga tehnološki napredak često ima remetilački (eng. disruptive) efekat na sve oblasti društva, pa i na pravo. Disciplina koja izučava primenu tehnologije na pravo naziva se LegalTech. U ekonomskom smislu, LegalTech je deo privrede koji povezuje tehnološko tržište sa tržištem pravnih usluga. Prema kriterijumu stepena upliva tehnologije na tradicionalne zadatke pravne struke, oblast LegalTech-a deli se na LegalTech 1.0, 2.0. i 3.0. Razvoj LegalTech-a uključuje sledeće oblasti: analizu teksta, pretraživanje informacija, automatizacija usluga i prediktivnu analizu. Nastao kao rezultat digitalizovane društvene svesti, LegalTech je tu da ostane. Napori akademske zajednice ključni su za pravno regulisan, tehnološki uravnotežen i socijalno kontrolisan razvoj LegalTech fenomena. Primena tehnologije u pravu ne znači automatizaciju po svaku cenu - ona bi trebalo da se zasniva na komplementarnosti napora ljudi i učinka te tehnologije u pružanju optimalnog kvaliteta pravnih usluga.
Abstract
Technology is advancing exponentially, while knowledge of technology is growing linearly. This is the very reason for a disruptive effect technological progress often has on all areas of society including law. The discipline that studies the application of technology to law is called LegalTech. In economic terms, LegalTech connects the technology market with the legal services' providers. Using he degree of influence of technology on the traditional tasks of the legal profession as the criterion, the field of LegalTech is divided into LegalTech 1.0, 2.0. and 3.0. The development of LegalTech includes the following areas: text analysis, information research, automation of legal services and predictive analysis of legal issues. Created as a result of digitalization, LegalTech is here to stay. The efforts of the academic community are crucial for the legally regulated, technologically balanced, and socially controlled development of the LegalTech phenomenon. The application of technology in law does not mean automation at all costs: it should be based on the complementarity of human efforts and the performance technology delivers in the process of providing legal services' optimal quality.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
 
|
Alexis, C., de Filippi, P., Sok, K. (2019) Blockchain Technology and Financial Regulation: A Risk-Based Approach to the Regulation of ICOs. European Journal of Risk Regulation, Nr. 10
|
|
|
Bing, J. (2010) Let there be LITE: A brief history of legal information retrieval. European Journal of Law and Technology, Nr. 1, http://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/15, 1. 3. 2022
|
|
1 
|
Cvetković, P. (2021) Sinteza pravnog teksta i programskog koda - slučaj Rikardijanskog ugovora. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, vol. 60, br. 90, str. 61-76
|
|
1
|
Cvetković, P. (2021) Ugovor kao algoritam - uvodna razmatranja. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, vol. 60, br. 92, str. 15-34
|
|
|
da Costa, P.C., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Liao, B., Malerba, A., Rotolo, A., van der Torre, L. (2017) Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation. u: Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law, https://www.academia.edu/download/76687461/document.pdf, 31. 1. 2022
|
|
|
Goodenough, O.R. (2015) Getting to Computational Jurisprudence 3.0. u: The Challenge of Innovation in Law, https://iris.unitn.it/bitstream/11572/111654/1/santosuosso-goodenough-tomasi_ challenge_2015.pdf#page=20, 1. 3. 2022
|
|
1
|
Haney, B.S. (2020) Applied Natural Language Processing for Law Practice. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3483758, 1. 3. 2022
|
|
|
Hartung, M., Bues, M., Halblieb, G. (2018) Legal Tech: How Technology is Changing the Legal World. München: C.H. Beck
|
|
|
Lucien, M. (1959) Mechanisation of Thought Processes. London
|
|
|
Mccarty, T.L. (1976) Reflections on TAXMAN: An experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review, Nr. 90, ://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle= hein.journals/hlr90§ion=51, 31. 1. 2022
|
|
|
Sabahi, F., Akbarzadeh, T., Mohammad, R. (2014) Introducing validity in fuzzy probability for judicial decision-making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Nr. 6, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X13002922, 31. 1. 2022
|
|
|
Sergot, M.J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R., Kriwaczek, F., Peter, H., Cory, H.T. The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. http://epilog.stanford.edu/logicprogramming/readings/british_nationality.pdf, 31. 1. 2022
|
|
|
Williams, S. (2019) Predictive Contracting. Columbia Business Law Review, Nr. 1, https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ pubs/856/, 31. 1. 2022
|
|
|
|
|