Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [2]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
Back povratak na rezultate
2016, vol. 55, br. 74, str. 161-173
Neke specifičnosti poreske kontrole u savremenim uslovima poslovanja
Univerzitet u Nišu, Pravni fakultet, Srbija

e-adresamevi@prafak.ni.ac.rs
Projekat:
Zaštita ljudskih i manjinskih prava u evropskom pravnom prostoru (MPNTR - 179046)

Ključne reči: poreska kontrola; agresivno poresko planiranje; poboljšani odnosi oporezivanja
Sažetak
Predmet analize u radu su neki posebni mehanizmi koje razvijene poreske administracije sve češće koriste kako bi dopunile tradicionalnu poresku kontrolu. Inoviranje poreske procedure izazvano je velikim teškoćama koje se javljaju u vezi sa utvrđivanjem realnog poreskog činjeničnog stanja obveznika koji posluju van nacionalnih granica. U suštini, radi se o nastojanjima ka postepenom menjanju prirode poreskih odnosa od zapovedničkih i birokratskih u odnose saradnje i poverenja. Poboljšani odnosi oporezivanja obuhvataju različite mehanizme, odnosno proceduralne novine od kojih se očekuje da olakšaju upravljanje poreskim rizicima i da doprinesu efikasnijoj naplati poreza. Kako bi se izbegli nepotrebni sukobi i troškovi, poreskim obveznicima se pruža mogućnost da unapred traže mišljenje od poreskih organa o poreskim posledicama nameravane transakcije ili da zaključuju prethodne sporazume vezane za vrednovanje transfernih cena ili se zahteva da dostavljaju podatke o šemama agresivnog poreskog planiranja.
Reference
*** (2008) Study into the role of tax intermediaries. OECD
*** (2011) Tackling aggressive tax planning through improved transparency and disclosure. OECD Publishing
*** (2013) Tackling corporate tax avoidance in a global economy: Is a new approach needed?. House of Lords, Report, Preuzeto 13.9.2014. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/. 48.pdf
*** (1990) Taxpayers' rights and obligations: A survey of the legal situation in OECD countries. OECD
*** (2015) Update on voluntary disclosure programmes: A pathway to tax compliance. OECD
Baker, P. (2015) The BEPS project: Disclosure of aggressive tax planning schemes. INTERTAX, Vol. 43. Issue 1. 85-90
Becker, J., Davies, R.B., Jakobs, G. (2014) The economics of advance pricing agreements. Oxford University Centre for Business taxation, WP 14/26
Biz, C. (2015) Countering tax avoidance at the EU level after luxleaks: A history of tax rulings, transparency and BEPS: Base erosion and profit shifting or bending European prospective solutions?. Diritto e pratica tributaria internazionale, Vol. XII, N. 4. 1036-1067
D`ascenzo, M. (2015) Global Trends in Tax Administration. Journal of Tax Administration, Vol. 1, No. 1. 9; 5; http://www.jota.website/article/view/15/30
Đinđić, S.M. (2014) Evaluation of the effects of the international tax planning. Ekonomski horizonti, vol. 16, br. 3, str. 177-193
European Commission (2015) Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011(16)EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation. Brussels, COM 135final. Preuzeto 5.5.2016
Farnsworth, K., Fooks, G. (2015) Corporate Taxation, Corporate Power, and Corporate Harm. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 54(1): 25-41
Freedman, J. (2006) Defining taxpayer responsibility: In support of a general anti-avoidance principle. University of Oxford - Faculty of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Working Paper No 147, str. 339
Gutman, H. (2012) The role of tax advisor in the changing world of global tax administration: The 2012 Erwin N. Griswold lecture before the American College of tax counsel. Preuzeto 3.5.2016. www.americanbar.org/. tax. /ttl-spr12-01-Gutm
Hrustić, H. (2015) Harmonizacija poreskog zakonodavstva Srbije sa poreskim pravom Evropske Unije. Pravo i privreda, vol. 53, br. 7-9, str. 438-452
Kovačević, N.Ž. (2016) Prethodna obavezujuća porezna mišljenja - novi institut hrvatskog poreznog postupka. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta Rijeka, Vol. 27, br. 1. 267-289
Lang, M. (2015) Tax rulings and state aid law. British Tax Review, Reprinted from, issue 3. 391-395
Larin, G.N., Duong, R., Jacques, M. (2008) Policy forum: Responses to aggressive tax planning: A study framework. Canadian Tax Journal, vol. 56, No 1, str. 158
Marino, G. (2014) New exchange of information versus tax solutions of equivalent effect: General report. u: EATLP Congress OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project (Explanatory Statement), OECD, [2015], Preuzeto 1.3.2016. www.oecd.org/tax/beps-explanatory-statement-2015.pdf
Owens, J. (2012) Tax Administrators, Taypayers and Their Advisors: Can the Dynamics of the Relationship Be Changed?. Bulletin for international taxation, September. 516-518
Roch, M.T.S. (2012) Tax Administration vs. taxpayer: A new deal?. Preuzet 3.5.2016. www.eatlp.org/uploads/. Moessnor%20lecture
Sawyer, A. (2004) Is an international tax organization an appropriate forum for administering binding rulings and APAs. eJournal of Tax Research, Vol. 2, Num. 1. 8-70
Tomić, Z.R. (2015) Pogled na opšti poreski procesni zakon - neke odabrane upravne dileme. Pravo i privreda, vol. 53, br. 7-9, str. 420-437
Verbic, M., Cok, M., Sinkovec, D. (2014) Some evidence for implementing an enhanced relationship in Slovenia. Financial Theory and Practice, 38(1): 61-80
Vukšić, Z. (2012) Provedba horizontalnog praćenja u velikih poreznih obveznika. Porezni vjesnik, br. 5. 84-98
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: originalan članak
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfni1674161A
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 27.05.2017.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka