- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:4
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:3
|
|
|
2015, vol. 57, br. 2, str. 21-33
|
|
Kriminalnopolitički aspekti odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela - različiti teorijski pristupi
Criminal policy on corporate criminal liability: Different theoretical approaches
Sažetak
Rad se bavi različitim teoretskim pristupima vezanim za utvrđivanje odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela u nacionalnom zakonodavstvu. Kriminalitet korporacija predstavlja ozbiljnu kriminalnu pojavu koja izaziva visok stepen društvene opasnosti u mnogim oblastima - odražava se na ekonomiju i trgovinu, zdravlje i bezbednost na radnom mestu, ekološku zaštitu, ljudska prava i drugo. Uvođenje krivičnopravne odgovornosti pravnih lica u većinu savremenih zakona otvorilo je teorijske debate u okviru različitih akademskih disciplina, kao što su krivično pravo, kriminologija, sociologija i socijalna psihologija, ekonomske i druge nauke. Kao važna kriminološka disciplina, kriminološka politika treba da se bavi analizom argumenata pro et contra odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela kao instrumenta za prevenciju i suzbijanje korporativnog i drugih vidova privrednog kriminala. Centralni deo rada istražuje različite teorijske poglede i argumente vezane za efikasnost i opravdanost zakonodavnih mera uperenih protiv pojave korporativnog kriminala. Autor naglašava ekonomske, sociološke i korporativno-kulturne aspekte uvođenja i utvrđivanja krivične odgovornosti pravnih lica. Cilj autora jeste da prikaže različite dimenzije ove teme i ukaže na njihovu međusobnu povezanost.
Abstract
The article focuses on different theoretical approaches towards establishing corporate criminal liability in national legislatures. Corporate crime is a serious criminal phenomenon, which produces high level of social danger in many fields - economy and trade, health and safety at workplace, environmental protection, human rights and others. Introducing criminal liability of legal persons in most of contemporary legislatures has opened theoretical debates in various academic disciplines, such as criminal law, criminology, sociology and social psychology, economic science and others. As a significant criminological discipline, criminal policy is supposed to analyze arguments pro et contra corporate criminal liability as an instrument of prevention and combat against corporate and other forms of white-collar crime. The central part of the article examines different theoretical views and arguments on efficiency and justification of legislative measures towards corporate crime phenomenon. The author stresses economical, sociological and corporate cultural aspects of introducing and implementing criminal liability of legal persons. The author aims to shed light on different dimensions of the matter, pointing to interdependency of various aspects.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
Adler, R.W., Lord, C. (1991) Environmental Crimes: Raising the Stakes. George Washington Law Review, 59 (4); 781-861
|
|
|
Arlen, J. (1994) The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability. Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (2); 833-867
|
|
|
Banović, B., Milošević, M. (2014) Povrede ljudskih prava od strane korporacija i mogućnosti krivičnopravne zaštite. Teme, vol. 38, br. 3, str. 1253-1271
|
|
1
|
Braithwaite, J. (1984) Corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
|
|
|
Braithwaite, J. (1985) To Punish or Persuade: enforcement of coal mine safety. Albany, New Yersey: Suny Press
|
|
|
Coffee, J. (1998) Corporate Criminal Liability: An Introduction and Comparative Survey. u: Eser A., Heine G., Huber B. [ur.] Crim inal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, International Colloquium, Berlin, May 4-6
|
|
4
|
Đurđević, Z. (2003) Kaznena odgovornost i kazneni postupak prema pravnim osobama u Republici Hrvatskoj. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, Zagreb, broj 2, str. 724-727
|
|
|
Fisse, B. (1995) Corporations, Crime and Accountability. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 6 (3); 378-386
|
|
|
Geis, G., Dimento, J. (1995) Should We Prosecute Corporations and/or Individuals?. u: Pearce F., Snider L. [ur.] Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
|
|
|
Gruner, R.S. (2007) Preventive Fault and Corporate Criminal Liability: Transforming Corporate Organizations into Private Policing Entities. u: International Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime, : 279-306
|
|
1
|
Keković, Z., Milošević, M. (2011) Kriminalitet korporacija - kriminološki i kulturološki aspekti. Sociološki pregled, vol. 45, br. 1, str. 19-44
|
|
1
|
Ljuština, A. (2013) Neverbalna komunikacija i bezbednosna kultura u sistemu obezbeđenja lica i imovine. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 55, br. 1, str. 98-108
|
|
2 
|
Milošević, M. (2012) Odgovornost pravnih lica za krivična dela. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Doktorski rad
|
|
|
Milošević, M. (2014) Globalne dimenzije kriminaliteta korporacija i mogućnosti međunarodnog prava. Kultura polisa, 39-53, XII
|
|
|
Milošević, M., Banović, B. (2015) White Collar Crime and Human Security. u: Đorđević, et al. [ur.] Twenty Years of Human Security - Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications, Paris: Faculty of Security Studies, pp: 199-211
|
|
|
Milutinović, M. (1984) Criminal Policy. Belgrade
|
|
|
Moore, C.A. (1987) Taming the Giant Corporation? Some Cautionary Remarks on the Deterrability of Corporate Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 33(3): 379-402
|
|
|
Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2013) Conflict of interest regarded as unethical conduct. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 55, br. 1, str. 5-16
|
|
|
Paternoster, R., Simpson, S. (1996) Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime. Law & Society Review, 30(3): 549
|
|
13
|
Petrović, L., Sinkovski, S. (2012) Korporativna bezbednost - osnove zaštite biznisa i preduzetništva. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 54, br. 3, str. 86-109
|
|
|
Radulović, Lj. (1999) Criminal Policy - The Policy of Crime Deterrence. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law
|
|
2
|
Simović-Hiber, I. (2007) Sistem rasprava o ideji vladavine prava, osnovama krivičnog zakona, pojmu zločinačke grupe i internacionalizaciji krivičnog prava. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja
|
|
1
|
Simpson, S.S., Koper, C.S. (1992) Deterring corporate crime. Criminology, 30(3): 347-376
|
|
1
|
Simpson, S.S. (2002) Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
|
12
|
Stojanović, Z., Kolarić, D. (2010) Krivičnopravno reagovanje na teške oblike kriminaliteta. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
|
|
48
|
Stojanović, Z.P. (2009) Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
|
|
|
Stotland, E. (1982) The Role of Law Enforcement in the Fight against White-Collar Crime. u: Edelhertz H., Overcast T.D. [ur.] White-Collar Crime: An Agenda for Research, Lexington: Lexing ton Books, 69-98
|
|
|
Wells, C. (2001) Corporations and Criminal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
|
1
|
Yaeger, P. (2007) Understanding corporate lawbreaking: From profit seeking to law finding. u: Pontell H., Geis G. [ur.] International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime, New York: Springer Science
|
|
|
|
|