Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:9
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 7 od 9  
Back povratak na rezultate
2017, vol. 65, br. 1, str. 7-24
Očuvanje biodiverziteta i pravo intelektualne svojine - konceptualni nesporazum
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresaslobodan.mark@sezampro.rs
Ključne reči: patent; bidiverzitet; genetski resursi; tradicionalno znanje; javni domen
Sažetak
Autor je postavio tezu o konceptualnom neskladu između prava intelektualne svojine i ciljeva Konvencije o zaštiti biodiverziteta. Teza je razrađena kao analiza: a) problema na nivou pojedinih instituta patentnog prava i prava zaštite genetskih resursa i tradicionalnog znanja, b) javnih politika podsticanja tehnološkog razvoja i konzervacije biodiverziteta i v) sukoba ideoloških vrednosti iz kojih su te javne politike proizašle. Zaključak je da se u centru problema nalazi različit i protivrečan pravni, politički i ideološki tretman javnog domena, zavisno od toga da li se na njega gleda iz ugla interesa razvijenog ili tzv. trećeg sveta.
Reference
Bratspies, R.M. (2006) The New Discovery Doctrine: Some Thoughts on Property Rights and Traditional Knowledge. American Indian Law Review, 31(2): 315
Finston, S.K. (2005) The Relevance of Genetic Resources to the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 8(2): 141-155
Fowler, C. (2001) Protecting farmer innovation: The convention on biological diversity. Jurimetrics, 41
Ho, C. (2006) Biopiracy and beyond: A consideration of socio-cultural conflicts with global patent policies. University of Michigen Journal of Law Reform, 39
Saks, Dž. (2014) Doba održivog razvoja. Beograd, Saks, Dž. Doba održivog razvoja, Beograd 2014
Sampath, P. (2005) Regulating bioprospecting: Institutions for drug research, access and benefit sharing. United Nations University
Srinivas, K. (2016) Traditional knowledge and intellectual property rights: A note on issues, some solutions and some suggestions. Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 3, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1140623, April 2016
Swanson, T. The economics of the biodiversity convention. University of Cambridge Disusssion Paper, GEC 92-08, http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gec_1992_08.pdf, mart 2016
Ullrich, H. (2005) Traditional Knowledge, Biodiversity, Benefit-Sharing and the Patent System: Romantics v. Economics?. u: European University Institute Working Paper 7, Florence
UNCTAD-ICDS (2005) Resource book on TRIPS and development. Geneva
Vogel, J.H., ed. (2010) The museum of bioprospecting, intellectual property and the public domain: A place, a process, a philosophy. London
WIPO (2016) Second revision of the consolidated document related to intellectual property and genetic resources. WO/GA/48/9
WIPO (2008) The protection of traditional knowledge: Draft gap analysis. Geneva, dokument WIPO/GRTKF/IC/13/5(b)rev. Annex I), www.wipo.int/tk/en/igc/gap-analyses.html, April 2016
World Trade Organization (2006) The relationship between the TRIPS agreement and the convention on biological diversity: Summary of issues raised and points made. IP/C/W/368/Rev. 1
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: članak
DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1701007M
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 21.05.2017.
Creative Commons License 4.0