Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: [2]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:5
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
članak: 8 od 31  
Back povratak na rezultate
Strategic Management
2010, vol. 15, br. 2, str. 13-21
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
objavljeno: 13/07/2010
Strategic management and social responsibility in Serbia: Globalization strategies of multinational companies
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aArgosy University - San Francisco Bay Area, USA
bHigher School of Professional Business Studies, Novi Sad

e-adresa: lnordgren@argosy.edu

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
The globalization strategies of multinational corporations have been criticized frequently as being predatory and competitively harmful to host-country businesses. In Strategy & Society (Porter & Kramer, 2006), Harvard's Michael Porter, along with Mark Kramer, asserts that wise strategic management can and should be at the same time socially responsible management. This paper tests Michael Porter's theory with multinational companies operating in Serbia during the current period of globalization. How well can firms develop and implement strategies that combine profitability and social responsibility? What role does innovation play in their ability to combine strategy and society? The strategies of multinational corporations operating in Serbia are analyzed to evaluate how effectively they are able to mix profit with commitment to society as manifested in the evident increase of the quality of life of the employees and their families, as well as in the social development of local communities and the national economy. Recommendations are made for how corporate strategies can build profits, innovation, and ethics together as a competitive advantage when firms expand globally.

Ključne reči

Reference

Altria Group (2010) The Altria group story. www.altria.com/about_altria/1_6_1_altriastory.asp
Business Monitor International. (2009) Multinational companies in Serbia 2010 directory. http://www.businessmonitor.com/dm/dir/serbia/
Chester, J., Montgomery, K. (2008) No escape: Marketing to kids in the digital age. Multinational Monitor, 29 (1), 11-16
Datamonitor Group (2009) The Procter & Gamble company: Company profile. u: Business Source Premier Electronic Database, Oct.r 22, Retrieved January 14, 2010
Edutube (2009) Smoking prevalence: Men and women. J Bone Miner Res, www.edutube.org
Morris, P. (2004) Reckless. Multinational Monitor, 25 (7/8), 45
Nordgren, L. (2006) Cross-cultural management research for the FP7 global challenge: Building the Europe of Knowledge. u: Modern Management Research in the Context of European Research Area (ERA)., Kaunas
Nordgren, L. (2007) Business ethics syllabus. Dubrovnik: American College of Management and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Unpublished syllabus
Nordgren, L. (2008) Keys to competitive firm performance during economic transition: Empirical evidence from southeastern Europe. Novi Sad: Faculty of Management, Doctoral dissertation
Nordgren, L., Đurić-Kuzmanović, T. (2010) Towards a theoretical framework for the research of gender effects in fiscal policy on economic development in Serbia. u: Allied Social Science Associations (ASSA) Annual Conference, Atlanta
Philip Morris International (2008) Philip Morris International 2008 Annual Report. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/14/146476/PMAR2009.pdf
Porter, M. (1985) Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press
Porter, M., van der Linde, C. (1995) Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct, 73 (5), 120-134
Porter, M., Kramer, M. (2006) Strategy and society: Link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Vol 84 Issue 12, December, pp. 78-92
Porter, M.E. (2001) Strategy and Internet. Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 62-78, March
Porter, M.E. (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 86 (1), 78-93
Porter, M.E. (1996) What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 61-78
Porter, M.E. (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press
Porter, M.E. (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68 (2), 73-93
Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press
Porter, M.E. (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harv Bus Rev, maj-jun, 65 (3), 43-59
Porter, M.E. (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6), 77-90
Porter, M.E., Millar, V.E. (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev, br. 4, str. 149-160
Procter and Gamble Company (2009) The Procter & Gamble Company 2009 Annual report. annualreport.pg.com/annualreport2009
Procter and Gamble Company (2009) The Procter & Gamble Company 2009 Sustainability overview. www.pg.com/en_US/downloads/sustainability
Robertson, C.J., Crittenden, W.F. (2003) Mapping moral philosophies: Strategic implications for multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4): 385
Rojsek, I. (2001) From red to green: Towards the environmental management in the country in transition. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1): 37
Weissman, R. (2008) How things work: The FTC s revolving door. Multinational Monitor, 29 (1), 28-31