- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:7
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
|
|
|
2019, vol. 53, br. 3, str. 955-973
|
|
Da li je vreme za uvođenje samoprocene restriktivnih sporazuma u pravo konkurencije Republike Srbije?
Is it time for the introduction of self-assessment of restrictive agreements into Serbian competition law?
Projekat: Rad je nastao kao rezultat istraživanja u 2019. godini u okviru projekta "Pravna tradicija i novi pravni izazovi" čiji je nosilac Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
Sažetak
U 2018. godini formirana je radna grupa za izradu novog Zakona o zaštiti konkurencije. Jedno od pitanja koje je postavljeno je da li u domaćem pravu treba zadržati mehanizam pojedinačnog izuzeća restriktivnih sporazuma od zabrane, uvesti samoprocenu ili treba usvojiti srednje rešenje kojim bi se učesnicima na tržištu omogućilo da odluče da li žele da samovrednuju svoj sporazum ili da ocenu sporazuma izvrši Komisija za zaštitu konkurencije. U ovom radu autor izlaže prednosti i nedostatke pojedinačnog izuzeća i samoprocene, ukazuje na otvorena pitanja u vezi sa mehanizmom samoprocene i, na kraju, iznosi moguća rešenja de lege ferenda.
Abstract
A working group for drafting the new Law on Protection of Competition was formed in 2018. One of the issues raised was whether the legal norms regulating individual exemptions of restrictive agreements should be amended. In other words, it was discussed whether the system of notification of restrictive agreements for individual exemption should be retained or self-assessment of restrictive agreements should be introduced. Another suggested alternative was to allow undertakings to decide if they want to self-asses their agreements or to request individual exemption from the Commission for Protection of Competition. In this paper, the author analyses advantages and shortcomings of both systems, identifies open questions in relation to the system of self-assessment and proposes possible solutions de lege ferenda.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (1962) Council regulation No 17 of 6 February 1962, first regulation implementing articles 85 and 86 of the treaty (articles 81 and 82 after the Treaty of Amsterdam). Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC), 013, 21.02, 0204 - 0211
|
|
|
*** (2009) Uredba o sadržini zahteva za pojedinačno izuzeće restriktivnih sporazuma od zabrane. Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 107
|
|
|
*** (2014) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Ten years of antitrust enforcement under Regulation 1/2003: Achievements and future perspectives. Brussels, COM(2014) 453
|
|
|
*** (2003) Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal L, 001, 04/01/2003, P. 1-25
|
|
|
*** (2011) Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements (Obaveštenje Komisije - Smernice o primeni čl. 101 UFEU na horizontalne spo. Official Journal C, 11, 14.1, p. 1-72
|
|
|
*** (2010) Obaveštenje Komisije - Smernice za vertikalna ograničenja (Commission notice: Guidelines on Vertical Restraints). Official Journal C, 130, 19.05, p. 1-46
|
|
|
*** (2009/2013) Zakon o zaštiti konkurencije - ZZK. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 51 i 95
|
|
|
*** Radna verzija Nacrta Zakona o zaštiti konkurencije. https://www.paragraf.rs/dnevne-vesti/090519/090519-vestl4.html
|
|
 
|
Bailey, D. (2016) Reinvigorating the role of article 101(3) under Regulation 1/2003. Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 81, 111-144
|
|
1
|
Bechtold, R., Bosch, W., Brinker, I. (2014) E.U. Kartellrecht. München, 716
|
|
1
|
Butorac-Malnar, V., Kaufman-Pecotić, J., Petrović, S. (2013) Pravo tržišnog natjecanja. Zagreb, 311
|
|
|
European Commission (1999) White Paper on modernization of the rules implementing articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty. Brussels, Commission Programme br. 99/027, COM 101 fin, 28. 04
|
|
|
European Commission (1999) XXIXth report on competition policy. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/annual_report/1999/en.pdf
|
|
2  
|
Fišer-Šobot, S.S. (2016) Koncentracije spajanjem učesnika na tržištu i koncentracije sticanjem kontrole u pravu konkurencije Srbije i Evropske unije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 50, br. 2, str. 533-547
|
|
|
Fišer-Šobot, S.S. (2018) Predatorske cene kao oblik ekskluzione zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja u praksi sudova Evropske unije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 52, br. 3, str. 1059-1074
|
|
|
Komisija za zaštitu konkurencije Uputstvo u vezi sa podnošenjem zahteva za pojedinačno izuzeće restriktivnih sporazuma odzabrane. http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/UPUTSTVO-Podnosenje-zahteva-za-pojedinacno-izuzece-restriktivnih-sporazuma-od-zabrane.pdf
|
|
7
|
Korah, V. (2004) An introductory guide to EC Competition Law and practice. Oxford-Portland, Oregon
|
|
|
Marcos, F., Sánchez, G.A. (2010) A missing step in the modernisation stairway of EU Competition Law: Any role for block exemption regulations in the realm of regulation 1/2003?. Competition Law Review, 6: 183-201
|
|
1
|
Mestmäcker, E., Schweitzer, H. (2014) Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht. München, 470-471
|
|
1
|
Schröter, H., Thinam, J., Klotz, R., Mederer, W., ur. (2014) Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, Grosskommentar. Baden-Baden, 919
|
|
2
|
Whish, R., Bailey, D. (2015) Competition law. Oxford
|
|
|
|
|