- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
|
|
2022, vol. 70, br. 2, str. 533-549
|
Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku
Virtual litigation hearings
Sažetak
U članku koji se bavi posledicama pandemije korona virusa na parnični postupak, autorka analizira institut ročišta na daljinu u Republici Srbiji. Najpre je dat kritički osvrt na važeći Zakon o parničnom postupku i njegove odredbe o izvođenju dokaza na daljinu, a zatim su analizirane mogućnosti za izmene i dopune u toj oblasti. Sagledano je nekoliko aspekata uređenja ročišta na daljinu da bi se formirali elementi buduće norme. Povodom pitanja usklađenost pravila postupka sa tehnološkim razvojem društva u stručnoj javnosti se javila sumnja da li je taj institut usklađen sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje. Autorka je analizirala uporednopravna rešenja i praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava kako bi došla do zaključaka o usklađenosti ročišta na daljinu sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje.
Abstract
In a paper dealing with the ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic to the litigation proceeding, the author analyses the institution of remote hearings in the Republic of Serbia. A critical reflection was given to the current Law on Civil Litigation and its provisions on presenting evidence from a distance. Afterwards, suggestions were provided for changing and amending these provisions. Several ways for regulating distant hearings were analysed to form the elements of the future norm. When it comes to the actual issue of harmonising the proceeding with the society's technological advancements, there is scepticism in the expertly public on how to harmonise this institution with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to the fair trial. The author analysed arrangements from the comparative law and the ECHR practice to reach a conclusion on harmonising remote hearings with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to a fair trial.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2021) Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on online dispute resolution machanisms in civil and administrative court proceedings
|
1
|
Baumbach, A., Lauterbach, W., Albers, J., Hartmann, P. (2014) Zivilprozessordnung. München: C. H. Beck
|
|
Council of Europe (2020) Videoconference in court proceedings: Human rights standards. u: Regional online round table
|
1
|
Dika, M. (2008) O načelu neposrednosti u parničnom postupku de lege lata uz neke projekcije de lege ferenda. Zbornik PFZG, 58
|
|
Hau, W. (2020) Litigation in the time of Covid-19, Some observations from Germany. Septentrio Reports: Civil justice and Covid-19, (5): 29-31
|
38
|
Jakšić, A. (2012) Građansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
|
|
Jauering, O., Hess, B. (2011) Zivilprozessrecht. München: C. H. Beck
|
26
|
Klajn, I., Šipka, M. (2010) Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza. Novi Sad: Prometej
|
|
Krstić, I., Tešović, O., Milovanović, I., Dakić, D. (2021) Suđenje na daljinu, pravni okvir i praksa. Beograd: Forum sudija Srbije
|
|
Neil, A. (2013) Andrews on Civil Process. Cambridge: Intersentia
|
31
|
Poznić, B., Rakić-Vodinelić, V. (2015) Građansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
|
6
|
Rosenberg, L., Schwab, K.H., Gottwald, P. (2010) Zivilprozessrecht. München: C.H. Beck
|
|
Schack, H. (2019) Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht. München: C. H. Beck
|
|
Sorabji, J. (2020) English and Welsh Courts in the Age of Covid-19. Septentrio report: Civil justice and Covid-19, No. 5
|
|
Susskind, R. (2013) Tomorrow's lawyers: An introduction to your future. Oxford University Press
|
|
Uzelac, A. (2020) Sudski postupak nakon korone - transformacija ili kapitulacija?. Suvremena trgovina, 4/45
|
|
World Bank (2021) Improving Commercial Justice in BiH in the face of COVID-19 crises: Phase II Analysis: Medium to Long-Term Strategies
|
|
Zöller, R.G. (2014) Zivilprozessordnung. Köln: Dr. Otto Schmidt
|
|
|
|