Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:40
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:15
članak: 3 od 148  
Back povratak na rezultate
Journal on Processing and Energy in Agriculture
2019, vol. 23, br. 1, str. 38-40
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
doi:10.5937/jpea1901038M


Združivanje useva prosa i soje za proizvodnju biomase
aInstitut za kukuruz 'Zemun polje', Zemun
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Hemijski fakultet

e-adresa: mmilena@mrizp.rs

Projekat

Integralni sistemi gajenja ratarskih useva: očuvanje biodiverziteta i plodnosti zemljišta (MPNTR - 31037)

Sažetak

Održiva poljoprivreda obuhvata proizvodnju visoko-kvalitetne hrane i hraniva sa minimalnim uticajem na životnu sredinu. Združivanje useva je jedan od najefikasnijih načina za dobijanje biomase visoke hranljive vrednosti. Ispitivane su sledeće kombinacije združenih useva: naizmenični redovi soje i prosa (S-M), naizmenične trake 2 reda soje i 2 reda prosa (SS-MM-SS) i naizmenične trake 2 reda soje i 4 reda prosa (SS-MMMM-SS); samostalni usev soje i samostalni usev prosa. Praćen je takođe i uticaj mikrobiološkog đubriva Coveron. Nadzemna biomasa je sakupljena i odnos ekvivalenata zemljišta (LER) kao i indeks lisne površine (LAI) su određeni. Sve kombinacije združenih useva utiču na povećanje indeksa lisne površine soje u odnosu na samostalni usev, do 43% i 84% u SS-MM-SS kombinaciji sa i bez Coveron-a. Coveron neznatno utiče na povećanje LAI, u proseku. Najviši prinos biomase je postignut u S-M kombinaciji za soju (39% i 42% viša u odnosu na čisti usev, u kombinaciji sa i bez Coveron-a) i u čistom usevu za proso. Ipak, najveća vrednost LER-a je dobijena za SS-MM-SS kombinaciju bez Coveron-a (1.12). Kod združenih useva tretiranih Coveron-om, slične vrednosti LER-a su dobijene za S-M i SS-MMMM -SS kombinacije (0.97 i 0.98). Bez obzira na način setve, rezultati pokazuju da je 1:1 odnos soje i prosa u združenim usevima (S-M i SS-MM-SS kombinacije) najperspektivniji način da se postignu visoki prinosi biomase.

Ključne reči

združeni usevi; biomasa; odnos ekvivalenata zemljišta (LER); indeks lisne površine (LAI)

Reference

Novododat članak: provera, normiranje i linkovanje referenci u toku.
Amanullah, Khan, F., Muhammad, H., Jan, A.U., Ali G. (2016). Land equivalent ratio, growth, yield and yield components response of mono-cropped vs. inter-cropped common bean and maize with and without compost application. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 7 (2), 40-49.
Baghdadi, A., Halim, R.A., Ghasemzadeh, A., Ramlan, M.F., Sakimin, S.Z. (n.d.). Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the yield and quality of silage corn intercropped with soybean. PeerJ, 6. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5280
Du, J., Han, T., Gai, J., Yong, T., Sun, X., Wang, X., Yang, F., Liu, J., Shu, K., Liu, W., Yang, W. (2018). Maize-soybean strip intercropping: Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17 (4), 747-754.
Duchene, O., Vian, J.F., Celette, F. (2017). Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 240, 148-161.
Eskandari, H., Ghanbari, A., Javanmard, A. (2009). Intercropping of cereals and legumes for forage production. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 1 (1), 7-13.
Esmaeili, A., Sadeghpour, A., Hosseini, S.M.B., Jahanzad, E., Chaichi, M.R., Hashemi, M. (2011). Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare ) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata). International Journal of Plant Production, 5 (4), 395-404.
Gong, X.W, Li, J., Ma, H.C., Chen, G.H., Wang, M., Yang, P., Gao, J.F., Feng, B.L. (2018). Field microclimate and yield for proso millet intercropping with mung bean in the dryland of Loess Plateau, Northwest China. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 29 (10), 3256-3266.
Habiyaremye, C., Matanguihan, J.B., Guedes, J.A., Ganjyal, G.M., Whiteman, M.R., Kidwell, K. K., Murphy, K.M. (2017). Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1961.
Iqbal, M.A., Hamid, A., Ahmad, T., Siddiqui, M.H., Hussain, I., Ali, S., Ali, A., Ahmad, Z. (2018). Forage sorghum-legumes intercropping: effect on growth, yields, nutritional quality and economic returns. Bragantia, 0, 0. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017363
Jahanzad, E., Sadeghpour, A., Hoseini, M.B., Barker, A.V., Hashemi, M., Afshar, R.K. (2015). Competition, nitrogen use efficiency, and productivity of millet-soybean intercropping in semiarid conditions. Crop Science, 55, 2842-2851.
Kalinová, J. (2007). Nutritionally important components of proso millet (Panicum Miliaceum L.). Faculty of Agriculture, South Bohemia, Czech Republic.
Malézieux, E., Crozat, Y., Dupraz, C., Laurans, M., Makowski, D., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Rapidel, B., Tourdonnet, S., Valantin-Morison, M. (2009). Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29 (1), 43-62.
Manjunath, M.G., Salakinkop, S.R. (2017). Growth and yield of soybean and millets in intercropping systems. Journal of Farm Sciences, 30 (3), 349-353.
Mead, R., Willey, R.W. (1980). The concept of a 'Land Equivalent Ratio' and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 217-228.
Mousavi, S.R., Eskandari, H. (2011). A general overview on intercropping and its advantages in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 1 (11), 482-486.
Nelson, S. C., Robichaux, R. H. (1997). Identifying plant architectural traits associated with yield under intercropping: Implications of genotype-cropping system interactions. Plant Breeding, 116 (2), 163-170.