- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:0
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
|
2022, br. 3, str. 463-476
|
|
Razlike u komparativističkim teorijama Alana Votsona i Patrika Glena
Differences in the comparative theories of Alan Watson and Patrick Glenn
Keywords: comparative law; transplants law; theory of tradition; legal history and legal tradition
Sažetak
Savremeni komparativisti Alan Votson i Patrik Glen, osnivači teorija pravnih transplantata i teorije tradicije, iako pripadaju istoj epohi uporednopravne discipline, veoma se razlikuju u načinu pristupanja savremenim pitanjima uporednog prava. Na početku rada je istaknuto pozajmljivanje pravnih tradicija kao jedini zajednički element ovih naučnika i istorija kao prelazna tačka i put "od slaganja ka neslaganju". Autor se bavi analizom odnosa između teorija koje Votson i Glen zastupaju, sa posebnom pažnjom na razlike i suprotnosti koje u njima postoje. Prvo je naglašena razlika u shvatanju pravne istorije koja se javlja kao rezultat različitih pravnih teorija koje komparativisti zastupaju. Zatim autor ističe i analizira razlike u značaju i ulozi pravne tradicije i uporednog prava, koje predstavljaju nepremostiv jaz u gledištima ovih naučnika.
Abstract
Contemporary comparativists Alan Watson and Patrick Glenn, the founders of the theory of transplants law and the traditional theory, although belonging to the same era of comparative legal disciplines, greatly differ in their ways of approaching contemporary issues of comparative law. At the beginning, the borrowing of legal traditions as the only common element of these scholars and history as a transition point and a path "from agreement to disagreement" was emphasized. The author analyzes the relationship between the theories Watson and Glenn advocate. First, the difference in the understanding of legal history that appears as a result of different legal theories that comparativists advocate is emphasized. Then, the author points out and analyzes the differences in the significance and role of comparative law and legal tradition, which represent an unrecognizable gap in the views of these scholars.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (2014) Sveto pismo Novoga zaveta. Beograd: Sveti arhijerejski sinod Srpske pravoslavne crkve, Preveo Đuro Daničić
|
|
|
*** (2014) H. Patrick Glenn. Montreal: McGill University - Faculty of Law, Dostupno na: https://www.mcgill.ca/law/community/memoriam/glenn-h-patrick, 18. 10. 2021
|
|
9 
|
Avramović, S., Stanimirović, V. (2019) Uporedna pravna tradicija. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
|
|
 
|
Avramović, S. (2010) From general legal history towards comparative legal traditions. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 58, br. 3, str. 20-39
|
|
|
Berman, J.H. (2000) The Western Legal Tradition in a Millennial Perspective: Past and Future. Louisiana Law Review, 60(3): 738-763
|
|
|
Burke, E. (1790) Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford World's Classics
|
|
|
Carbonneau, T.E. (2000) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 48(4): 729-732
|
|
|
Duve, T. (2018) A Dialogue between Comparative Law and Comparative Legal History. London: Informa UK
|
|
|
Ewald, W. (1995) Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(4): 489-510
|
|
|
Glenn, P. (2001) Are Legal Traditions Incommensurable?. American Journal of Comparative Law, 49(1): 133-145
|
|
|
Glenn, P. (2004) Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford: University of Oxford
|
|
|
Gutteridge, H.C. (1949) Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study. Cambridge: University Press
|
|
4
|
Hamilton, M. (2003) Sociologija religije. Beograd: CLIO
|
|
|
Norman, P. (2004) Comparative Law: Problems and Prospects. Oxford: University of Oxford
|
|
|
Pelikan, J. (1984) The Vindication of Tradition. New Haven: Yale University
|
|
7
|
Votson, A. (2010) Pravni transplanti - pristup uporednom pravu. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
|
|
|
Watson, A. (1985) Sources of Law, Legal Change and Ambiguity. Michigen Law Review, 83(4), pp. 750-754
|
|
|
Watson, A. (1995) From Legal Transplants to Legal Formats. American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(3): 469-476
|
|
|
|
|