Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:16
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:2
article: 3 from 85  
Back back to result list
Vojnosanitetski pregled
2019, vol. 76, iss. 1, pp. 67-71
article language: English
document type: Short Communication
doi:10.2298/VSP170301140P

Creative Commons License 4.0
Efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in preoperative staging of rectal cancer
Pavlović-Marković Aleksandraa, Barišić Goranb, Ninčević Jelenaa, Milovanović Tamaraa, Garalejić Elijanac, Stojković-Lalošević Milicaa, Krivokapić Zoranb ORCID
aClinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Belgrade + University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade + Clinical Centre of Serbia, First Surgical Clinic, Belgrade
cUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade + Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics 'Narodni front', Belgrade

e-mail: scpy@beotel.net

Abstract

Background/Aim. The outcome of rectal cancer is dependent on the stage of the tumour. There are several classification systems used to describe the extent of the disease. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in preoperative local staging of rectal cancer using endosonographic probes with different views (180° vs 360°), as well as an influence of experience of an endoscopist on the TRUS performance. Methods. TRUS was performed in 127 patients with rectal carcinoma by two endoscopists. Seventy-one patients were examined with a 180° endosonographic probe (group A) and 56 patients with a 360° rotating probe (group B). All findings were compared with a histopathology report. Results. TRUS had a diagnostic overall accuracy of 91.3% for the tumor (T) category (k = 0.866, SE (k) = 0.038, p < 0.0001) and 71.7% for the node (N) category (ϰ = 0.374, SE (k) = 0.082, p < 0.0001). In the group A, TRUS had a diagnostic overall accuracy of 88.7% for the T category (ϰ = 0.805, SE (k) = 0.063, p < 0.0001), and 70.4% for the N category (ϰ = 0.376, SE (k) = 0.101, P < 0.0001). In the group B, TRUS had a diagnostic overall accuracy of 94.6% for the T category (ϰ = 0.920, SE (k) = 0.044, p < 0.0001), and 73.2% for the N category (ϰ = 0.379, SE (k) = 0.131, p = 0.004). Experience of the endoscopist had no significant influence on results of preoperative staging of rectal cancer by using TRUS. Conclusion. The accuracy rate of TRUS in the preoperative local staging of rectal cancer is high. Our results imply no significant difference in the overall accuracy rates when using endosonographic probes with different views (180° vs 360°). Also, there was no significant influence of endoscopist experience on results obtained.

Keywords

rectal neoplasms; carcinoma; neoplasm staging; preoperative period; ultrasonography; diagnosis; differential

References

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Al-Sukhni, E., Milot, L., Fruitman, M., Beyene, J., Victor, J. C., Schmocker, S., Brown, G., McLeod, R., Kennedy, E. (2012) Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category, Lymph Node Metastases, and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19(7): 2212-2223

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Bipat, S., Glas, A.S., Slors, F.J. M., Zwinderman, A.H., Bossuyt, P.M. M., Stoker, J. (2004) Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging-A Meta-Analysis. Radiology, 232(3): 773-783

[ GS ]

Colaiácovo, R., Assef, M.S., Ganc, R.L., Carbonari, A.P., Silva, F.A., Bin, F.C., i dr. (2014) Rectal cancer staging: Correlation between the evaluation with radial echoendoscope and rigid linear probe. Endosc Ultrasound, 3(3): 161-6

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ 1 ][ GS ]

Dworak, O. (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc, 3(2): 96-9

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ 9 ][ GS ]

Ferlay, J., Autier, P., Boniol, M., Heanue, M., Colombet, M., Boyle, P. (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Annals of oncology, 18(3): 581-92

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Garcia-Aguilar, J., Pollack, J., Lee, S., Hernandez, de A.E., Mellgren, A., Wong, D.W., Finne, C.O., Rothenberger, D.A., Madoff, R.D. (2002) Accuracy of Endorectal Ultrasonography in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Tumors. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 45(1): 10-15

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Guinet, C. (1990) Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer. Archives of Surgery, 125(3): 385

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Harewood, G.C. (2005) Assessment of Publication Bias in the Reporting of EUS Performance in Staging Rectal Cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100(4): 808-816

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ 2 ][ GS ]

Herzog, U., von Flüe, M., Tondelli, P., Schuppisser, J.P. (1993) How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum, 36(2): 127-34

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ 1 ][ GS ]

Hildebrandt, U., Feifel, G. (1985) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum, 28(1): 42-6

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Hildebrandt, U., Feifel, G., Schwarz, H. P., Scherr, O. (1986) Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1(4): 203-207

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Kim, M.J. (2014) Transrectal ultrasonography of anorectal diseases: advantages and disadvantages. Ultrasonography, 34(1): 19-31

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Lahaye, M.J., Engelen, S.M.E., Nelemans, P.J., Beets, G.L., van de Velde, C.J.H., van Engelshoven, J.M.A., Beets-Tan, R.G.H. (2005) Imaging for Predicting the Risk Factors-the Circumferential Resection Margin and Nodal Disease-of Local Recurrence in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 26(4): 259-268

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

McKeown, E., Nelson, D.W., Johnson, E.K., Maykel, J.A., Stojadinovic, A., Nissan, A., Avital, I., Brücher, B.L., Steele, S.R. (2014) Current Approaches and Challenges for Monitoring Treatment Response in Colon and Rectal Cancer. Journal of Cancer, 5(1): 31-43

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Muthusamy, V. R., Chang, K. J. (2007) Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 13(22): 6877s-6884s

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ 1 ][ GS ]

Orrom, W.J., Wong, W.D., Rothenberger, D.A., Jensen, L.L., Goldberg, S.M. (1990) Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. A learning experience. Dis Colon Rectum, 33(8): 654-9

[ PM ] [ EČ ][ 1 ][ GS ]

Rifkin, M.D., Ehrlich, S.M., Marks, G. (1989) Staging of rectal carcinoma: Prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology, 170(2): 319-22

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Schaffzin, D.M., Wong, W. D. (2004) Endorectal Ultrasound in the Preoperative Evaluation of Rectal Cancer. Clinical Colorectal Cancer, 4(2): 124-132

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Siddiqui, A.A., Fayiga, Y., Huerta, S. (2006) The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of rectal cancer. International Seminars in Surgical Oncology, 3(1):

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ][ 1 ][ GS ]

Siegel, R., Ward, E., Brawley, O., Jemal, A. (2011) Cancer statistics, 2011. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(4): 212-236

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Solomon, M.J., McLeod, R.S. (1993) Endoluminal transrectal ultrasonography. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 36(2): 200-205

[ EČ ][ GS ]

Stepansky, A., Halevy, A., Ziv, Y. (2010) Preoperative staging using transrectal ultrasound in high and low rectal cancer. Isr Med Assoc J, 12(5): 270-2

[ CR ] [ PM ] [ EČ ] [ WOS ][ GS ]

Valentini, V., Beets-Tan, R., Borras, J.M., Krivokapić, Z., Leer, J.W., Påhlman, L., Rödel, C., Schmoll, H.J., Scott, N., van de Velde, C., Verfaillie, C. (2008) Evidence and research in rectal cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 87(3): 449-474

[ GS ]

Wild, J.J., Reid, J.M. (1956) Diagnostic use of ultrasound. Brit Phys Med, 11: 248-57

[ CR ] [ EČ ][ GS ]

Xu, D., Ju, H.-X., Qian, C.-W., Jiang, F. (2014) The value of TRUS in the staging of rectal carcinoma before and after radiotherapy and comparison with the staging postoperative pathology. Clinical Radiology, 69(5): 481-484