Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:6
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:2

Contents

article: 3 from 11  
Back back to result list
2020, vol. 59, iss. 87, pp. 255-272
The choice of method in civil dispute resolution and decision-making factors
University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Law

emaildanijela.petrovic@pr.ac.rs
Abstract
The disputes arising as a consequence of the violation of subjective civil rights can be resolved through litigation, settlement, alternative dispute resolution, or some other method (compromise, force, etc.). By choosing the method in which they wish to resolve their dispute, the disputing parties also choose the rules that must be followed in the dispute resolution proceedings. If the disputing parties choose to protect their violated or threatened rights in litigation proceedings, they are obliged to comply with the established rules regulating civil procedure. If the decision on dispute resolution proceedings involves impartial third parties (a mediator, an arbitrator, etc.), the disputing parties' relations will be regulated by the rules of particular proceedings. Acting as rational individuals, the disputing parties choose the dispute resolution method that enables them to obtain the highest benefit. The parties' decision on the choice of the dispute resolution method is influenced by a number of factors. Economic analysis has developed models and offered answers for determining the reasons why disputing parties decide to choose a specific dispute resolution option. This paper presents the decision-making factors which influence the parties' choice to resolve their dispute through litigation, settlement, or particular alternative dispute resolution proceedings.
References
*** (2014) Zakon o posredovanju u rešavanju sporova. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 55
*** (2011-2018) Zakon o parničnom postupku -ZPP. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 49/2013 -odluka US 74/2013 -odluka US 55/2014 i 87/2018
Benson, B.L. (2000) Arbitration. in: Bouckaert Boudewijn, De Geest Gerrit [ed.] Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. V, the Economics of Crime and Litigation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 722 p., ISBN 1 85898 988 4
Cooter, R., Ulen, T. (2016) Economics and Law. New York: Pearson Addison Wesley, 6th edition
Friedman, L.M. (1989) Litigation and Society. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 17-29
Fuller, L. (1971) Mediation-its form and functions. Sought California Law Review, vol. 44
Garth, B. (1993) From civil litigation to private justice: To legal practice at war with the profession and its values. Brooklyn Law Review, vol. 59
Irvine, M. (1999) Better letter than never: Settlement at the federal court of appeals. Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Jovanović, A. (1998) Uvod u ekonomsku analizu prava. Centar za publikacije, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Kaplow, L., Shavell, S. (2002) Economic analysis of law. in: Handbook of Public Economics, Elsevier
Karamarković, L. (2004) Poravnanje i medijacija. Beograd: Fakultet za poslovno pravo
Knežević, G., Pavić, V. (2009) Arbitraža i ADR. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Labus, M., Begović, B., Jovanović, A. (2008) Ekonomija za pravnike. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Marčetić, D., Filipović, V. (2017) Vrednost predmeta spora. in: Propisi u praksi, Legeartis, 03. 05. 2020, https://www.legeartis.rs
Marčetić, D., Filipović, V. Vrednost predmeta spora. in: Propisi u praksi, Legeartis, https://www.legeartis.rs/ (03. 06. 2020. godine)
Menkel-Meadow, S. (1995) Whose dispute is it anyway?: A psilosophical and demokratic defence of settlement (is some cases). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 83
Mojašević, A. (2009) Ekonomska analiza nakanade štete. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, magistarska teza
Mojašević, A. (2012) Ekonomska analiza alternativnog rešavanja građanskopravnih sporova. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, doktorska disertacija
Mojašević, A. (2015) Parnica nasuprot neposrednom pregovaranju - ekonomska analiza. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Nišu
Mojašević, A. (2020) Ekonomska analiza parničnog postupka. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Nišu
Nikolić, Lj., Mojašević, A. (2016) Ekonomija za pravnike. Niš: Medivest
Petrušić, N. (2010) Evropski standardi i principi rešavanja sporova putem medijacije. in: Vukadinović G., Kartag-Odri A. [ed.] Evropska zajednica naroda i univerzalne vrednosti, Novi Sad: Novosadska teoriju, za etiku i filozofiju prava
Prescott, J.J., Spier, K.E., Yoon, A. (2014) Trial and settlement: A study of high-low agreements. Journal of Law and Economics, 57(3), 699-746
Raovanov, A. (2011) Građansko procesno pravo, parnični, vanparnični i izvršni postupak. Novi Sad, drugo, izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje
Robert, S., Runinfeld, L.D. (1989) Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution. Journal of Economic Literature, 27
Shavell, S. (2009) Temelji ekonomske analize prava. Zagreb: MATE
Stanković, G. (2010) Građansko procesno pravo, prva sveska - parnično procesno pravo. Niš: Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta
Stanković, G. (2007) Građansko procesno pravo - parnično procesno pravo. Niš: Udruženje za građansko procesno i arbitražno pravo, prva sveska
Varijan, H. (2010) Mikroekonomija - moderan pristup. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn0-24526
published in SCIndeks: 02/09/2020
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0