2014, vol. 52, br. 4-6, str. 231-244
|
|
Standard 'pravično suđenje' u stečajnom postupku
'Fair trial' standard in a bankruptcy proceeding
Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet
Sažetak
Problem primenljivosti standarda iz čl. 6 st. 1 Evropske konvencije na stečajne postupke izazovan je, a uslovljen nizom posebnosti koje karakterišu ovu sudsku proceduru. Ne upuštajući se, dakle, u analiziranje problema koje primena ovog člana otvara u svim sudskim i upravnim postupcima, pokušali smo da, veoma restriktivnim pristupom, odaberemo manji broj interesantnih i važnih pitanja, a, pre svih, ona koja se tiču pojma 'odlučivanje', 'građanska prava i obaveze', 'spor' i(ili) 'rasprava' i 'razuman rok'. Odabir teme uslovljen je neophodnošću da države koje su prihvatile Evropsku konvenciju obezbede zaštitu prava čiji korpus ona sadrži, odnosno da u postupcima zaštite tih prava obezbede ostvarenje garantija 'pravičnog suđenja'. Dodatni, verovatno i preovlađujući motiv, bilo je i saznanje da se u relevantnim odlukama Evropskog suda za ljudska prava protiv države Srbije o povredi prava iz čl. 6 st. 1 u stečajnom postupku, ne zaključuje, po pravilu, samostalno, već uz povrede učinjene u drugim, sa stečajnim postupkom povezanim, građanskim sudskim postupcima. Na osnovu analiziranja ograničenog broja problema moglo bi se zaključiti da je standard 'pravično suđenje' i samostalno primenljiv na stečajne postupke.
Abstract
The problem of applying Art. 6 par. 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights to bankruptcy proceedings is caused by a number of specific traits that characterize this type of court proceedings. Without trying to go into a detailed analysis of the problems that the application of this Article opens in all court and administrative proceedings, we have attempted to be restrictive and select a number of interesting and significant issues that are, before all, related to the following topics: 'adjudication', 'civil rights and duties', 'dispute', 'argumentation' and 'reasonable time'. The selection of a topic is preconditioned by the necessity that the countries that ratified this Convention should ensure the protection of rights embodied in its corpus, that is that ensuring of these rights should constitute the guaranty of 'fair trial'. The additional and, possibly, prevailing, motivation came from the fact that some relevant decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against the state of Serbia related to the violation of Art. 6 par. 1 of the Convention in bankruptcy proceedings did not refer exclusively to this kind of proceeding, but were passed in connection with the violation of rights in some other civil court proceedings. Having analyzed a restricted number of problems, we could conclude that the 'fair trial' standard can be independently applied to bankruptcy proceedings as well.
|