- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:24
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11
|
|
2020, vol. 10, br. 19, str. 115-124
|
Prećutni pristanak u doktrinama Džona Loka i Džona Rolsa
Tacit consent in the doctrines of John Locke and John Rawls
Sažetak
U političkoj teoriji često se postavlja pitanje kako da se uspostavi vlast koja je legitimna, a pritom se pod legitimnom vlašću podrazumijeva ona vlast koja ne ugrožava autonomiju volje pojedinca, koja je, prema savremenoj političkoj teoriji, uslov da bismo mogli da govorimo o vlasti nad građanima, u suprotnom možemo da govorimo o podanicima, što nije predmet ove tematike. Da bi se očuvala autonomija volje pojedinca, potrebno je da trpioci odluka vlasti dobrovoljno daju pristanak na tu vlast. U političkoj teoriji i praksi postoje različite vrste pristanka, pored ostalih postoji i izričit i prećutni pristanak. Ovaj rad baviće se fenomenom prećutnog pristanka, preciznije analizom koncepta prećutnog pristanka u doktrinama Džona Loka i Džona Rolsa.
Abstract
Political theory often raises the question of how to establish an authority that is legitimate, the latter implying that the said authority does not threaten the autonomy of the will of an individual, which, according to modern political theory, is a condition allowing us speak about authority over citizens. Otherwise, we could talk about subjects of that authority, which is not relevant for this paper. In order to preserve the autonomy of the will of an individual, it is necessary that the decision-makers of the authorities voluntarily consent to them. There are different types of consent in political theory and practice, among which are explicit and tacit consent. This paper deals with the phenomenon of tacit consent, more precisely with an analysis of the concept of tacit consent in the doctrines of John Locke and John Rawls.
|
|
|
Reference
|
3
|
Beran, H. (1987) The consent theory of political obligation. London: Croom Helm
|
3
|
Buchanan, J. (1975) The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago
|
|
Darwal, S. (2003) Contractarianism / contractualism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
|
|
FEE (1995) Tacit consent: A quiet tyranny. Foundation for Economic Education, https://fee.org/articles/tacit-consent-a-quiettyranny/. 02. 01. 2020
|
|
Green, A.S. (2012) Against obligation: The multiple source of authority in a liberal democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
|
|
Hampton, J. (2007) The intrinsic worth of persons-contractarianism in moral and political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
2
|
Hobbes, T. (1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1651
|
|
Hume, D. (1985) Of the original contract. u: Miller E. [ur.] Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, revised edition, 1748
|
|
Kant, I. (1970) On the current saying: This may be true in theory, but it does not apply in practice. u: Reiss H. [ur.] Kant's Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1793, H. Nisbet, trans
|
|
King, L.A. (2013) Consent. 12. 2019
|
|
Klosko, G. (2011) Political obligation. u: Klosko G. [ur.] The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
|
Locke, J. (1988) Second treatise on civil government. u: Laslett P. [ur.] Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1690
|
|
Lok, Dž. (2002) Dvije rasprave o vladi. Beograd: Utopija
|
|
Rawls, J. (1999) A theory of justice. http://www.consiglio.regione.campania.it/cms/CM_PORTALE_CRC/servlet/Docs?dir=docs_biblio&file=BiblioContenuto_3641. pdf. 25. 12. 2019
|
|
Raz, J. (1995) Ethics in the public domain-essays in the morality of law and politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press
|
3
|
Savanović, A. (2019) Teorija republike. Banja Luka: Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Fakultet političkih nauka
|
|
Simmons, A.J. (1993) On the edge of anarchy: Locke, consent, and the limits of society. Princeton: Princeton University Press
|
|
Simmons, A.J. (1979) Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton: Princeton University Press
|
|
Simmons, A.J. (1976) Tacit consent and political obligation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264884?seq=1. 2. 8. 2020
|
|
Singer, P. (1975) Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
|
Waldron, J. (1987) Theoretical foundations of liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
|
|
|