Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:6
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:4
article: 2 from 137  
Back back to result list
Pravni zapisi
2018, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 5-20
article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
doi:10.5937/pravzap0-16788

Creative Commons License 4.0
Collision and competition of fundamental rights in German law
Fridrih Aleksander Univerzitet Erlangen-Nirnberg, Pravni fakultet, Institut za opštu teoriju države i filozofiju prava, SR Nemačka

e-mail: vojislav.damnjanovic@fau.de

Abstract

Along with vertical effect of fundamental rights, which is undisputable, a more detailed analysis of the bonding-clause from Article 1, Paragraph 3 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany has shown that fundamental rights can also develop a horizontal effect. Although in the field of private law the principle of the freedom of contract and autonomy of the will are predominant, in cases of legal dispute, courts are obligated to consider fundamental rights of the parties involved within application of law and in particular when interpreting general clauses. In this respect, in the area of private law it is possible to determine an indirect effect of fundamental rights. Accordingly, fundamental rights which are established by constitution take effect in all areas of law, binding all courts both of ordinary and special jurisdiction, which are obligated to apply them directly. Fundamental rights can collide when two or more legal entities claim their own, most frequently different fundamental rights within the same facts of the case. In addition, there can also be a collision between fundamental rights and other constitutional principles. The problem of Constitutional law collision in German theory and case law is resolved by the principle of practical concordance, which is based on mutual balancing of the colliding interests protected by constitution. In doing so the Federal Constitutional court takes all relevant facts of the individual case into consideration. Contrary to the collision of fundamental rights, the competition of fundamental rights refers to the problem of proper application of the law, when in a particular case several different fundamental rights may be applied. In this regard, the division between freedom rights and equality rights is of major importance. If both freedom rights and equality rights are claimed, the Federal Constitutional court generally undertakes a cumulative examination of the violation of both rights. If violations of fundamental rights of the same group are claimed, certain relations of logical and normative primacy can be established. On the other hand, if there is no relation of primacy between the fundamental rights of the same group, possible violations of the fundamental rights have to be examined cumulatively.

Keywords

fundamental rights; collision; competition; Basic law for the Federal Republic of Germany

References

*** (1949/2017) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. BGBl, 23.05, S. 1; 13.07, BGBl. I S. 2347
*** (1896/2017) Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. BGBl, 18.08.1896, RGBl. S. 195; 02.01.2002, I S. 42, ber. S. 2909 und BGBl. 2003 I S. 738; 20.07.2017, BGBl. 1 S. 2787
*** (2012) Gesetz über den Umfang der Personensorge bei einer Beschneidung des männlichen Kindes. BGBl, 20.12. I S. 2749
*** (1871/2017) Strafgesetzbuch. BGBl, 15.05.1871, RGBl. S. 127; 13.11.1998, I S. 3322; 30.10.2017, BGBl. I S. 3618
*** (1983) Schulordnung für die Volksschulen in Bayern (BayVSO). 21.06, GVBl S. 597
*** (2006) Ustav Republike Srbije. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 98
Dreier, H. (2004) Grundgesetz Kommentar: Präambel. Tübingen, 2. Aufl. Bd. 1, Art. 1-19
Hesse, K. (1995) Grundzuge der Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Heidelberg
Jarass, H., Pieroth, B. (2016) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. München, 14. Aufl
Jellinek, G. (2011) System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte. Tübingen, hrsg. v. Kersten, Jens, 2 Aufl
Kalernborn, T. (2016) Die praktische Konkordanz in der Fallbearbeitung. JA, 6
Kingreen, T., Poscher, R. (2017) Grundrechte Staatsrecht II. Heidelberg, 33. Aufl
Kriele, M. (1984) Vorbehaltlose Grundrechte und die Rechte anderer. JA, 629
Maunz, T., Dürig, G. (2014) Grundgesetz Kommentar. München, Band 1, Art. 1-5
Pieroth, B., Schlink, B. (2008) Grundrechte Staatsrecht II. Heidelberg, 24. Aufl
Sachs, M. (2018) Grundgesetz Kommentar. München, 8 Aufl
Schmidt-Bleibtreu, B., Hofmann, H., Henneke, G.H. (2018) GG Kommentar zum Grundgesetz. Köln, 14 Aufl
Sodan, H., Ziekow, J. (2016) Grundkurs Öffentliches Recht. München, 7 Aufl
von Mangoldt, H., Klein, F., Starck, C. (2010) Kommentar zum Grundgesetz: Präambel. München, d. 1, Art. 1-19, 6. Aufl