- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2
|
|
|
2020, vol. 77, br. 12, str. 1289-1297
|
|
Odnos između somatskih tegoba, crta ličnosti i pozitivnosti
Correlation between somatic complaints, personality traits and positivity
Univerzitet Union, Fakultet za pravne i poslovne studije 'dr Lazar Vrkatić', Studijski program Psihoterapija , Novi Sad, Srbija
e-adresa: v.petrovic581@gmail.com
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Nedavna istraživanja su se bavila utvrđivanjem razlika u crtama ličnosti i njihove uloge u promociji zdravlja i moderiranju osetljivosti na nesreće i bolest. Cilj ovog rada bio je da se istraži moderatorska uloga somatskih tegoba i relacija crta ličnosti operacionalizovanih putem modela Kibernetske baterije konativnih testova (KON-6) i pozitivnosti. Metode. Istraživanje je sprovedeno na uzorku od 512 studenata, prosečne starosti 23,83 godine, 56,3% ženskog pola, 23% sa somatskim tegobama. U istraživanju je korišćena Skala pozitivne orijentacije koja meri pozitivnost i KON-6 koja meri šest dinamskih crta ličnosti - Sistem regulacije aktiviteta (e), Sistem regulacije organskih funkcija (ch), Sistem regulacije odbrambenih reakcija (a), Sistem regulacije napada (s), Homeostatsku koordinaciju sistema (d) i Integrativnu regulaciju sistema (e). Rezultati. Sve konativne dimenzije ličnosti značajno su i adekvatno korelirale sa pozitivnošću, izuzev s, dok je poduzorak sa prisustvom somatskih tegoba demonstrirao više skorove crtama a i e, upućujući na viši nivo anksioznosti i socijalne usklađenosti. Na kontrole efekata pola i starosti, crte ličnosti zajedno sa prisustvom somatskih tegoba objasnile su ukupno 26% varijanse pozitivnosti, koju pozitivno predviđa viša aktivnost e, te negativno viša aktivnost a i d. Moderacioni uticaji prisustva somatskih tegoba bili su detektovani u dve specifične relacije. Pozitivnost se mogla negativno predvideti aktivnošću homeostatske koordinacije sistema (d), ali samo kod studenata sa malim brojem somatskih tegoba, što je bio i slučaj sa sistemom regulacije organskih funkcija (ch), ali samo kod snažnog prisustva somatskih tegoba. Zaključak. Pozitivnost predstavlja dobru organizacionu i regulacionu dispoziciju za regulaciju kognitivnih, konativnih i motoričkih funkcija. Takođe, delom je moderirana prisustvom somatskih tegoba. Praktične implikacije ovih nalaza predstavljaju konkretnu podršku za razvoj pozitivnosti kod ljudi kako bi se osnažilo zdravlje ljudi.
Abstract
Background/Aim. Many recent studies have focused on investigation the differences in personality traits and its role in promoting health and in moderating vulnerability to adversities and illness. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of somatic complaints in moderating the relationship between personality traits operationalized in Cybernetic Battery of Conative Tests (KON-6) model and positivity. Methods. The sample consisted of 512 students, 23.83 years old in average, 56.3% were female, 23% reported the presence of somatic complaints. In investigation, the Positivity Scale measuring positivity and the KON-6 measuring the activity of 6 dynamic personality traits - activity regulation system (e), organic function regulation system (ch), defense reactions regulation system (a), attack regulation system (s), homeostatic system coordination(d) and regulation system integration (e) were used. Results. All of the conative personality traits were significantly correlated with positivity, except for s. The subsample with somatic complaints reported higher scores in a and e traits, suggesting higher levels of anxiety and social reality impairment. The personality traits together with presence of somatic complaints significantly explained 26% of positivity variance, positively predicting positivity with higher activity of e, and negatively with higher activity of a and d. The moderating role of somatic complaints was found in two specific relations. Positivity can be predicted in a reverse manner by homeostatic system coordination (d) but only in students with low somatic complaints, which was also the case for organic function regulation system (ch) but only in the presence of high somatic complaints. Conclusion. The positivity represents a good organizational and regulation disposition for regulating the cognitive, dynamic and motoric functions. It is also partially moderated by presence of somatic complaints. Practical benefit of these findings represents a concrete support for developing positivity in people, in order to empower people's health.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
  
|
Alessandri, G., Caprara, G.V., de Pascalis, V. (2015) Relations among EEG-alpha asymmetry and positivity personality trait. Brain and Cognition, 97: 10-21
|
|
1
|
Baumeister, R.F. (1993) Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self regard. New York: Plenum Press
|
|
|
Borsa, J.C., Damásio, B.F., de Souza, D.S., Koller, S.H., Caprara, G.V. (2015) Psychometric properties of the positivity scale: Brazilian version. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1): 61-67
|
|
|
Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L. (1993) BFQ: Big Five Questionnaire. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali
|
|
|
Caprara, G.V., Alessandri, G., Caprara, M.V. (2019) Associations of positive orientation with health and psychosocial adaptation: A review of findings and perspectives. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2): 126-132
|
|
|
Caprara, G.V., Fagnani, C., Alessandri, G., Steca, P., Gigantesco, A., Cavalli, S.L.L., Stazi, M.A. (2009) Human optimal functioning: The genetics of positive orientation towards self, life, and the future. Behavior Genetics, 39(3): 277-284
|
|
1
|
Caprara, G.V., Steca, P. (2005) Affective and social self-regulatory efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. European Psychologist, 10(4): 275-286
|
|
1
|
Caprara, G.V., Steca, P., Alessandri, G., Abela, J.R., Mcwhinnie, C.M. (2010) Positive orientation: Explorations on what is common to life satisfaction, self-esteem, and optimism. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 19(1): 63-71
|
|
|
Caprara, G.V., Alessandri, G.A., Eisenberg, N., Kupfer, A., Steca, P., Caprara, M.G., Yamaguchi, S., Fukuzawa, A., Abela, J. (2012) The Positivity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(3): 701-712
|
|
|
Caprara, G.V., Nisini, R., Castellani, V., Vittorio, P., Alessandri, G., Vincenzo, Z., Claudia, F., Valentina, G., Andrea, P.D., Biondo, M.I., Milanetti, F., Salerno, G., Vincenzo, V. (2017) Lymphocyte subsets are influenced by positivity levels in healthy subjects before and after mild acute stress. Immunology Letters, 188: 13-20
|
|
1
|
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. (2002) Optimism. u: Snyder C.R, Lopez J.L. [ur.] Handbook of positive psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231-243
|
|
1
|
Çıkrıkçı, Ö., Çiftçi, M., Gençdoğan, G. (2015) Pozitiflik Ölçeği Türkçe Formu'nun psikometrik özellikleri / the psychometric properties of the Turkish form of the Positivity Scale. Journal of Happiness and Well-Being, 3(1): 57-76. (Turkish)
|
|
9
|
Diener, E. (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3): 542-575
|
|
4
|
Diener, E., Diener, M. (1995) Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4): 653-663
|
|
12
|
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S. (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71-75
|
|
23
|
Digman, J.M. (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1): 417-440
|
|
4
|
Goodman, L.A. (1961) Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1): 148-170
|
|
|
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Rosenblatt, A., Burling, J., Lyon, D., Simon, L., Pinel, E. (1992) Why do people need self-esteem?: Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6): 913-922
|
|
6
|
Harter, S. (1999) The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford
|
|
1
|
Heikamp, T., Alessandri, G., Laguna, M., Petrovic, V., Caprara, M.G., Trommsdorff, G. (2014) Cross-cultural validation of the positivity-scale in five European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 71: 140-145
|
|
|
Horga, S., Ignjatović, I., Momirović, K., Gredelj, M. (1982) An attachment to the knowledge of the structure of convective characteristics. Psihologija, 15(3-4): 3-34
|
|
25
|
John, O.P., Srivastava, S. (1999) The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. u: John O.P, Robins R.W, Pervin L.A. [ur.] Handbook of personality: Theory and research, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 102-138
|
|
4
|
Kernis, M.H. (2003) Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1): 1-26
|
|
|
Łaguna, M., Oles', P.K., Filipiuk, D. (2011) Orientacja pozytywna i jej pomiar: Polska adaptacja Skali Orientacji Pozytywnej / Positive orientation and its measure: Polish adaptation of the Positivity Scale. Studia Psychologiczne, 49: 47-54. (Polish); doi: 10.2478/v10167-010-0035-7
|
|
1
|
Larsen, R.J., Buss, D.M. (2005) Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. New York: McGraw-Hill
|
|
|
Lauriola, M., Iani, L. (2015) Does positivity mediate the relation of extraversion and neuroticism with subjective happiness?. PLoS One, 10(3): e0121991
|
|
1
|
Lucas, R.E., Diener, E., Suh, E. (1996) Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3): 616-628
|
|
|
Mcadams, D.P., Pals, J.L. (2006) A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3): 204-217
|
|
|
Mccrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. J. (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1): 81-90
|
|
|
Mccrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. J., Martin, T.A. (2005) The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3): 261-270
|
|
|
Međedović, J. (2013) Analysis of the interaction of predictors in the linear regression models: An example of party evaluation. Primenjena psihologija, vol. 6, br. 3, str. 267-286
|
|
|
Miciuk, Ł.R., Jankowski, T., Laskowska, A., Oleś, P. (2016) Positive orientation and the five-factor model. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(1): 141-148
|
|
|
Momirović, K., Wolf, B., Džamonja, Z. (1992) KON-6: Cybernetic battery of conative tests. Belgrade: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju, (Serbian)
|
|
|
Robinson, C., Schumacher, R.E. (2009) Interaction effects: Centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35(1): 6-11
|
|
1
|
Royce, J.R., Powell, A. (1981) An overview of a multifactor-system theory of personality and individual differences: I: The factor and system models and the hierarchical factor structure of individuality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4): 818-829
|
|
1
|
Tian, L., Zhang, D., Huebner, E. S. (2018) Psychometric properties of the positivity scale among Chinese adults and early adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 197-197
|
|
|
|
|