Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:39
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11
članak: 3 od 611  
Back povratak na rezultate
Tehnika
2019, vol. 74, br. 4, str. 577-584
jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: prethodno saopštenje
doi:10.5937/tehnika1904577I

Creative Commons License 4.0
Donošenje investicione odluke u transportnoj kompaniji primenom integrisanog FUCOM-MABAC modela
Univerzitet Istočno Sarajevo, Saobraćajni fakultet, Doboj, Bosna i Herecegovina

e-adresa: faatiimaa_@live.com

Sažetak

Transport kao logistički podsistem predstavlja veliki uzročnik troškova logistike, a samim tim i utiče i na upravljanje poslovnim rezultatima kompanije. Stoga je potrebno donositi određene odluke i sprovoditi aktivnosti u cilju racionalizacije i optimizacije troškova. Jedan od načina je donošenje adekvatnih investicionih odluka koje mogu pozitivno uticati na poslovanje kompanije. U ovom radu je primjenjen integrisani Full Consistency method (FUCOM) - Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) model za izbor adekvatnog transportnog sredstva u kompaniji za međunarodni transport. FUCOM metoda je primjenjena za određivanje značaja kriterijuma na osnovu kojih se vrši izbor transportnog sredstva, dok je primjenom MABAC metode izvršeno rangiranje alternativa. Nakon toga izvršena je analiza osetljivosti koja potvrđuje prethodno dobijene rezultate.

Ključne reči

Reference

Novododat članak: provera, normiranje i linkovanje referenci u toku.
Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Kazimieras Zavadskas E, Ćirović G. and Prentkovskis O, The selection of wagons for the internal transport of a logistics company: A novel approach based on rough BWM and rough SAW methods. Symmetry, 9(11), p.264. 2017
Stojić G, Sremac S, & Vasiljković I, A fuzzy model for determining the justifiability of investing in a road freight vehicle fleet. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), 62-75. 2018
Liu F, Aiwu G, Lukovac V, & Vukic M, A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 121-130. 2018
Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Sremac S, A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: Full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry. 2018
Badi I, & Abdulshahed A, Ranking the Libyan airlines by using full consistency method (FUCOM) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 1-14. 2019
Erceg Ž & Mularifović F, Integrated MCDM model for processes optimization in supply chain management in wood company. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 37-50. 2019
Bozanic D, Tešić D, & Milićević J, A hybrid fuzzy AHP-MABAC model: Application in the Serbian Army-The selection of the location for deep wading as a technique of crossing the river by tanks. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1), 143-164. 2018
Fazlollahtabar H, Smailbašić A, Stević Ž, FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. 2019 49-65. 2019
Prentkovskis O, Erceg Ž, Stević Ž, Tanackov I, Vasiljević M & Gavranović M, A new methodology for improving service quality measurement: Delphi-FUCOM-SERVQUAL model. Symmetry, 10(12), 757. 2018
Noureddine M. & Ristic M, Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 66-85. 2019
Rezaei J, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. 2015
Saaty T. L, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. 1980
Pamučar D, Ćirović G, The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Com-parison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), p. 3016-3028, 2015
MacCrimmon K. R, Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach (No. RM-4823-ARPA). rand corp santa monica ca 1968
Zavadskas E. K. & Turskis Z, A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method inmulticriteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2),-159-172. 2010
Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Antucheviciene J., Zakarevicius A., Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronikairel ektrotechnika, (6 (122)), 3-7. 2012
Hwang C. L, Yoon K, Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Berlin: Springer. 1981
Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas E. K, Olfat L. & Turskis Z, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451, 2015