Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:58
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:14
članak: 2 od 2  
Back povratak na rezultate
Industrija
2018, vol. 46, br. 3, str. 47-69
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
doi:10.5937/industrija46-18041

Creative Commons License 4.0
Novi metod merenja autoriteta i odgovornosti u organizacijama - kvantitativni pristup
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet organizacionih nauka

e-adresa: jevtic.milos@fon.bg.ac.rs

Sažetak

U ovom radu se predlaže novi način merenja usklađenosti autoriteta i odgovornosti različitih pozicija u organizaciji. Prema principu kontrolabilnosti, odgovornost i autoritet treba da budu usklađeni kako bi organizacija ostvarila bolje rezultate. Uprkos tome, još uvek nedostaju metode kojim se ova usklađenost kvantifikuje. Zbog toga, cilj ovog rada je da unapredi način merenja autoriteta i odgovornosti. U radu se predlaže novi način merenja autoriteta i odgovornosti, kao i pravila za definisanje njihove usklađenosti. Predloženi metod je primenjen u istraživanju koje je sprovedeno u 241 organizaciji. Top menadžeri iz izabranih organizacija su odgovarali na pitanja iz strukturiranog upitnika. Rezultati su pokazali da postoji statistički značajna zavisnost između usklađenosti autoriteta i odgovornosti i organizacionih učinaka. Kako bi se prevazišla ograničenja sprovedenog istraživanja navedena u radu, u budućim istraživanjima bi trebalo da se potvrdi i verifikuje univerzalna primenljivost predstavljenog pristupa.

Ključne reči

organizaciona usklađenost; princip kontrolabilnosti; autoritet; odgovornost; organizacioni učinci; raspon autoriteta; raspon odgovornosti

Reference

Aghion, P., Tirole, J. (1997) Formal and Real Authority in Organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1): 1-29
Antle, R., Demski, J.S. (1988) The controllability principle in responsibility accounting. Accounting Review, 700-718
Arya, A., Glover, J., Radhakrishnan, S. (2007) The Controllability Principle in Responsibility Accounting: Another Look. u: Antle, Rick; Gjesdal, Frøystein; Liang, Pierre Jinghong [ur.] Essays in Accounting Theory in Honour of Joel S. Demski, New York, NY: Springer Nature, str. 183-198
Bedford, D.S., Malmi, T., Sandelin, M. (2016) Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51: 12-28
Bouwens, J., van Lent, L. (2007) Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4): 667-697
Burkert, M., Fischer, F.M., Schäffer, U. (2011) Application of the controllability principle and managerial performance: The role of role perceptions. Management Accounting Research, 22(3): 143-159
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hidllsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 2nd ed
Daft, R.L., Jonathan, M., Willmott, H. (2010) Organization theory and design. Cengage learning EMEA
Fischer, F.M. (2010) The Application of the Controllability Principle and Managers' Responses: A role theory perspective. Springer Science and Business Media
Frow, N., Marginson, D., Ogden, S. (2005) Encouraging strategic behaviour while maintaining management control: Multi-functional project teams, budgets, and the negotiation of shared accountabilities in contemporary enterprises. Management Accounting Research, 16(3): 269-292
Giraud, F., Langevin, P., Mendoza, C. (2008) Justice as a rationale for the controllability principle: A study of managers’ opinions. Management Accounting Research, 19(1): 32-44
Goold, M. (1993) Strategic control: Establishing milestones for long-term performance. Addison-Wesley
Jevtić, M. (2013) Pristup projektovanju organizacije zasnovan na merenju usklađenosti elemenata organizacije. Beograd: Fakultet organizacionih nauka
Jevtić, M., Jovanović, M., Krivokapić, J. (2018) A New Approach to Measuring the Correlation of Organizational Alignment and Performance. Management:Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 23(1): 41
Kaplan, S., Ruback, R. (1995) The valuation of cash flow forecasts: An empirical analysis. Jouraal of Finance, 51, 1059-1093
Khandwalla, P.N. (1973) Viable and Effective Organizational Designs of Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3): 481-495
Lunenburg, F.C. (2012) Organizational structure: Mintzberg's framework. International journal of scholarly, academic, intellectual diversity, 14(1); 1-8
Meier, K.J., o'Toole L.J. (2013) Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2): 429-456
Meier, K.J., Bohte, J. (2000) Ode to Luther Gulick. Administration & Society, 32(2): 115-137
Merchant, K.A., van der Stede, W.A. (2007) Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Pearson Education
Merchant, K.A. (1989) Rewarding results: Motivating profit center managers. Harvard Business School Press
Merchant, K.A., Otley, D.T. (2006) A Review of the Literature on Control and Accountability. Elsevier BV, str. 785-802
Mintzberg, H. (1979) The structuring of organisations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Mintzberg, H. (1989) The Structuring of Organizations. u: Asch, David; Bowman, Cliff [ur.] Readings in Strategic Management, London: Springer Nature, str. 322-352
Montana, P.J., Charnov, B.H. (2000) Management, Barron's educational series. New York
Ocansey, E.O., Enahoro, J.A. (2012) Determinant controllability of responsibility accounting in profit planning. Canadian social science, 8(6), 91
Otley, D. (2016) The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. Management Accounting Research, 31: 45-62
Pallant, J. (2011) SPSS priručnik za preživljavanje - postupni vodič kroz analizu podataka pomoću SPSS-a. Beograd: Mikro knjiga, 4th Edition
Perrow, C. (1986) Economic theories of organization. Theory and Society, 15(1-2): 11-45
Shingala, M.C., Rajyaguru, A. (2015) Comparison of post hoc tests for unequal variance. International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering, 2(5); 22-33
Simons, R. (1994) Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Press
Simons, R. (2005) Levers of organization design: How managers use accountability systems for greater performance and commitment. Harvard Business Press
Simons, R. (2010) Accountability and Control as Catalysts for Strategic Exploration and Exploitation: Field Study Results. SSRN Electronic Journal
Simons, R. (2013) The Entrepreneurial Gap: How Managers Adjust Span of Accountability and Span of Control to Implement Business Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal
Stevens, S.S. (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677-680
Todorović, D. (2008) Metodologija psiholoških istraživanja. Beograd
Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Zhou, N. (2007) Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(3): 300-327