- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5
|
|
2020, vol. 58, br. 2, str. 100-117
|
Višestruko zastupanje u osiguranju - sa posebnim osvrtom na ovlašćenja zastupnika i njegov status prema posredniku - brokeru
Multiple insurance agency: With special reference to the powers of the agent and his status in relation to the intermediary - broker
Sažetak
Zastupanje u osiguranju se u aktima EU i u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima pojedinih zemalja na drugačiji način definiše u odnosu na opšti pojam u ovoj oblasti. Naime, ova delatnost se posmatra i reguliše zajedno sa drugim oblicima distribucije osiguranja, kao što su posredovanje i brokeraža u osiguranju. U vezi sa tim, mora se posmatrati višestruko zastupanje, odnosno zastupanje više osiguravača od strane jednog zastupnika s obzirom na odnos zastupnika prema posredniku (brokeru) i obim njegovih ovlašćenja. Višestruko zastupanje u osiguranju nije na adekvatan način regulisano u zakonodavstvu Republike Srbije, u pravu EU niti u nemačkom zakonodavstvu, kome se takođe posvećuje pažnja u radu. Autor u radu posvećuje pažnju i regulisanju ovlašćenja zastupnika i njegovom statusu u odnosu na posrednika, odnosno brokera u osiguranju.
Abstract
Insurance agency, as a form of insurance distribution, is receiving more attention than before in EU law, as well as in the national legislation of individual countries. Insurance agency is viewed and defined in conjunction with other forms of insurance distribution, such as insurance intermediary and brokerage, as well as advisory services regarding the selection of the most favourable insurer. However, in the acts governing these institutes, it departs from the general concepts, so that broader definitions of the work performed by agents, intermediaries, brokers etc., must be used. Serbian legislation differentiates and defines insurance agents and brokers but, at the moment, brokers are not specifically regulated, as are other professional activities whose main or secondary business is the distribution of insurance. The paper focuses, primarily, on the multiple insurance agency, i.e. to the possibility of one person to represent multiple insurers and the relationship of insurance agency to the other activities in the field of insurance distribution. One of the questions the author is trying to answer relates to an exclusivity clause, which is a clause defining the agency for one specific insurer or more insurers. Also, the author specifically defines the difference between agency and intermediation. He specifies the criteria for distinguishing between these two activities and specifically determines the relationship of the insurer with the agent. The author analyzes the domestic and German legislation in this field, as well as the EU act regulating the distribution of insurance - Directive (EU) no. 2016/97 on insurance distribution. The paper pays particular attention to the provisions of Directive 2016/97 relating to tied insurance intermediaries. These are persons bound by a contract for one or more insurers. The contract defines that these persons will intermediate only for one or only for specific insurers. In practice, these are usually insurance agencies that have already defined the exclusivity clause in their contract with their insurer. So, Directive 2016/97 defines the ability to perform insurance distribution business for multiple insurers, but such an option applies to all insurance distributors, not just agents. Within the Serbian legislation, the author analyzes the provisions of the Act on Obligations, the Act on Insurance and the Pre-Draft Civil Code. In the provisions of these acts there is a great problem with defining both agency and intermediation in insurance. Also, there is a problem with defining the authorities of an insurance agent. Within the framework of German legislation, the author analyzes the Act on Insurance Contracts and Act on the Supervision of Insurance Undertakings.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2003) Direktiva o posredovanju u osiguranju (Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation). OJ, L 9, 15. 1
|
|
*** (2016) Direktiva o distribuciji osiguranja (Directive (EU) No. 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (recast)). OJ, L 26, 2. 2
|
|
*** (1978-2020) Zakon o obligacionim odnosima - ZOO. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 i 57/89, Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/93, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/2003 - Ustavna povelja i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/2020
|
|
*** (2014) Zakon o osiguranju - ZO. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 139
|
|
*** Prednacrt Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije - GZ. dostupno na adresi: https:// www.paragraf.rs/nacrti_i_predlozi/280519-prednacrt-gradjanskog-zakonikarepublikesrbije.html, 27. 3. 2020
|
|
*** (2015-2018) Zakon o osiguranju Republike Hrvatske - ZOH. Narodne novine, br. 30 i 112
|
|
*** (2007) Nemački Zakon o ugovorima o osiguranju iz 2007. godine (Gesetz über den Versicherungsvertrag). poslednje izmene 30. 11. 2019
|
|
*** (2015) Zakon o nadzoru osiguravajućih društava Nemačke iz 2015. godine (Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz). poslednje izmene 19. 12. 2018
|
|
*** (1869) Nemački Trgovački zakon iz 1869. godine (Gewerbeordnung). poslednje izmene 22. 11. 2019, čl. 34d, dostupno na adresi: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gewo/GewO. pdf, 20. 3. 2020; Više o tome, vid. Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Intermedi
|
|
Bohn, J.C. (2011) Intermediation of insurance and financial services in European VAT. Wolters Kluwer
|
|
Ćurković, M. (2017) Agent kao zastupnik više osiguratelja. 27. 6. 2017, https://www.osiguranje.hr/ClanakDetalji.aspx?18413, 29. 2. 2020
|
|
Ćurković, M. (2019) Nastanak i obuhvat regulatornih odredbi o distribuciji osiguranja. Hrvatski časopis za osiguranje, br. 1
|
|
Ćurković, M. (2007) Obvezna osiguranja u prometu. Zagreb
|
|
Ćurković, M. (2019) Ugovor o zastupanju u osiguranju. 16. 9. 2019, https://www.osiguranje.hr/ClanakDetalji.aspx?20070, 21. 3. 2020
|
1
|
Đorđević, S., Samardžić, D. (2014) Nemačko ugovorno pravo osiguranja sa prevodom Zakona (VVG). Beograd: IRZ
|
|
Eckardt, M., Räthke-Döppner, S. (2010) The quality of insurance intermediary services: Empirical evidence for Germany. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(3)
|
|
Glovsky, S.C. (2018) Insurance broker and agent liability. https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2018-march/insurancebroker-and-agent-liability, 30. 3. 2020
|
|
Graeme, B. (2010) The impact of legislation and regulation on the freedom of movement of capital in Estonia, Poland and Latvia. Cambridge Scholars Publishing
|
|
Ivanjko, Š. (1999) Zavarovalni posrednik in svetovalec - poklic prihodnosti. Agens, br. 7
|
|
Pak, J. (2018) Obaveze, odgovornost i osiguranje od odgovornosti posrednika u osiguranju. Tokovi osiguranja, br 1
|
|
Schaloske, H., Schramm, T., Kassing, D., Feldmann, K. (2018) Insurance: Germany, law and practice. Chambers and Partners
|
|
Slavnić, J. (2003) Ovlašćenja i obaveze brokera osiguranja. u: Šulejić Predrag, Slavnić Jovan [ur.] Pravo osiguranja u tranziciji, Beograd: Udruženje za pravo osiguranja Jugoslavije
|
13
|
Šulejić, P. (2005) Pravo osiguranja. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
|
|
Todorović-Symeonides, M. (2012) Duties and liabilites of insurance brokers -Focus on the information exchange and duty to advise in Greek, Serbian and UK law. Evropska revija za pravo osiguranja, br. 1
|
|
|
|