2018, vol. 56, br. 4-6, str. 190-203
|
|
Posredovanje u rešavanjusporova u Srbiji - osvrt na pojedine odredbe Zakona o posredovanju u rešavanju sporova
Mediation in resolving disputes in the Republic of Serbia: Review of certain provisions of the Law on Mediation in Resolving Disputes
Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet, Srbija
Sažetak
Prednosti posredovanja, prepoznate na globalnom nivou, kao i neophodnost poštovanja međunarodno preuzetih obaveza, posebno standarda Saveta Evrope, uslovile su prihvatanje ovog načina rešavanja sporova i u Republici Srbiji. Novi Zakon o posredovanju u rešavanju sporova, kao i prethodni (Zakon o posredovanju - medijaciji, iz 2005), reguliše ovaj altentaivni način rešavanja sporova naopšti način. Inventarisanjem pojedinih odredaba ovog Zakona uočavaju se izvesne nedoslednosti i nedostaci normativnog pristupa. U radu suanalizirane odredbe koje se odnose na vrste posredovanja prema ulozi koju može imati posrednik, medijabilnost sporova, neka od načela koja Zakon definiše, posebno poverljivost i način rgulisanja dokaznih zabrana, obavezno posredovanje i vreme u kome je moguće pristupiti posredovanju ukoliko je već pokrenut sudski ili postupak pred drugim organom.Takođe,ukazano je na potrebu preciziranja pojedinih odredaba, njihove izmene ili dopune, u cilju olakšane i efikasne primene Zakona i šire primene posredovanjau praksi.
Abstract
The advantages of mediation, recognized at global level, as well as the necessity to comply with the internationally assumed obligations, particularly the standards of the European Council, influenced the Republic of Serbia to accept this method of resolving disputes. The new Law on mediation in resolving disputes, as well as the previous one, the Law on mediation from 2005, regulates this alternative way of disputes resolution in a general way. Analyzing certain provisions of this law, we could discern some inconstancy and deficiency in the normative approach. In this paper, the author examines the provisions related to the types of mediation classified according to the role assumed by the mediator, disputes 'mediability', some of the principles defined by this law, particularly the principle of confidentiality and the way of regulating evidence acceptability, compulsory mediation and the time when the mediation can take place, in cases when the court trial or other type of procedure has already commenced before a relevant body. In addition, the author has pointed that it is necessary to make some of the provisions more precise, even to change or amend them in order to facilitate the effective application of the law and allow its wider use in practice.
|