This article follows current important organizational and legislative changes in the domestic administrative-court proceedings (administrative dispute). The ongoing judicial reform in Serbia includes creation of the Administrative Court, which should adjudicate administrative disputes in the first instance. A draft of the prospective Administrative Dispute Act is under development. It is the intention of the author to contribute to the changes aimed at improvement of the administrative-court protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens and organizations in the Republic of Serbia. The author analyzes Strasbourg standards, and the level of harmonization of Serbian legislative solutions and case-law with these standards. Strasbourg standards encompass European Convention on Human Rights - namely, Article 6 of the Convention regulating the right to fair trial, as well as the recommendations of the Council of Europe in the field of administrative law. The author identifies inner inconsistencies in respect of the right to access the court (right to initiate proceedings before a court and right to legal aid), provisional measures, determining facts in the administrative dispute, and execution of final court judgments. In the end, the author proposes organizational and legislative changes, which could be used to eliminate identified inconsistencies.