Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:4
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:1
article: 10 from 230  
Back back to result list
Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti
2019, iss. 1, pp. 35-50
article language: Serbian
document type: unclassified
published on: 01/04/2020
doi: 10.18485/fb_godisnjak.2019.2
Creative Commons License 4.0
The banality of power and the ideology of universalism: Reasons for, effects of and lessons drawn from NATO assault on Serbia in 1999
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Security Studies

Project

Conflicts and Crises, Cooperation and Development in Serbia and in the Region during 19th and 20th century (MESTD - 47030)

Abstract

NATO's political and - above all - military participation in secession-motivated conflicts in former Yugoslavia (1990-1995), will be remembered as a clear example of demonstration of power, intentions and (in)capability of the Victor in a decades-long global "cold war" between the "freedom-loving" West and "totalitarian East". Regardless of the expectations of liberal theoreticians and the majority of public opinion, it was soon revealed that the victory was no "triumph of freedom" and even less "the end of history". On the contrary, as historically typical, it was only an unstable resultant of relations between major actors in the modern global theater, who strive to legitimize their need for domination with varying success and vocabulary. Hence the lessons to be learned from the final act of destruction of Yugoslavia (several months of NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999) have the expected tone of banality: absolute might strives for absolute power (which remains unattainable in principle); "the mighty oppress" is true always and in any place (but with a time limit); and, finally, what everyone knows but does not (or is unable or refuses) to say aloud: the only true alternative to military threat and/or aggression of a single political actor is an equally valid (military) threat/aggression by another one. We are tempted to conclude that, despite the ideological ardor of NGO activists, the political correctness of theoreticians and the rhetorical figures of speech of politicians, the "banalities" remain valid as the only certainties, i.e., regularities in the unpredictable currents of relations between states.

Keywords

References

Cvetković, V.N. (1998) Strah i poniženje - Jugoslovenski građanski rat i izbeglice u Srbiji. Beograd: IES
Cvetković, V.N. (2018) Uncertain future and limited time. in: Cvetković V.N. [ed.] The new Silk Road: European perspectives: Security challenges / risks within the initiative 16+1, Belgrade: Faculty of Security Studies, 21-48
Cvetković, V.N. (2005) Volja za novo - o genealogiji modernosti. Beograd: Dereta
Cvetković, V.N. (1999) Real-liberalizam ili nove globalne i lokalne tiranide. Sociološki pregled, vol. 33, br. 1-2, str. 73-87
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin Books
Fukuyama, F. (2005) State-building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books
Špengler, O. (1990) Propast Zapada - nacrti za morfologiju istorije sveta. Beograd: Književne novine, I-IV