- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:4
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2
|
|
|
2018, vol. 57, br. 80, str. 463-480
|
|
Naučna saznanja perinatologije kao razlog za zaštitu prava fetusa
The scientific knowledge in the field of perinatology as a reason for protecting the rights of the fetus
Sažetak
Perinatologija je jedna od novijih grana medicine. Ova grana medicine se bavi problemima zdravstvene zaštite trudnica, fetusa i novorođenčadi. Najnovija naučna istraživanja i hirurške intervencije na fetusu koje se uspešno obavljaju pre rođenja deteta pokazuju vrlo dobre rezultate u lečenju obolelog fetusa. Ako je fetus zasebni subjekt u medicini onda bi trebao biti i zasebni subjekt u pravu. U ovom radu autori se bave pitanjem zaštite prava fetusa kao posebnog pravnog subjekta. Dosadašnja saznanja medicinske nauke ukazuju na to da je fetus ličnost, što znači da bi trebao biti pravom zaštićen. Ovaj rad pokušava dati i predloge za rešavanje sukoba interesa fetusa kao zasebnog subjekta u pravu i prava žena na slobodno odlučivanje o planiranju porodice.
Abstract
Perinatology is one of the most recently developed branches of medicine. It deals with the problems of health care and health protection of pregnant women, fetuses and newborns. The latest scientific research and surgical interventions which are performed on the fetus before child birth show really good results in the treatment of diseases in fetuses. If a fetus is regarded as a separate subject in medicine, it should also be regarded as a separate subject in law. In this article, the authors explore the issues concerning the protection of the rights of the fetus as a separate legal subject. The current knowledge of medical science indicates that the fetus is a personality, which means that a fetus should be legally protected. In this article, the authors also provide suggestions for resolving the conflict of interests concerning the rights of the fetus as a separate legal subject and the rights of patients who are users of fetal therapy.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (1971) Zakon o ratifikaciji međunarodnog pakta o građanskim i političkim pravima. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 7
|
|
   
|
Cvijetić, M. (2016) Dileme roditelja i donošenje odluke o ishodu trudnoće nakon prenatalno dijagnostikovanih anomalija fetusa. Psihološka istraživanja, vol. 19, br. 1, str. 83-105
|
|
|
Georgijević, G. (2004) Novčana naknada moralne štete prouzrokovane gubitkom nerođenog deteta. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 52, br. 1-2, str. 275-290
|
|
1
|
Korenromp, M.J., Page-Christiaens, G.C.M.L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E.J.H., Hunfeld, J.A.M., Potters, C.M.A.A., Erwich, J.J.H.M., van Binsbergen, C.J.M., Brons, J.T.J., Beekhuis, J.R., Omtzigt, A.W.J., Visser, G.H.A. (2007) A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27(8): 709-716
|
|
1
|
Natoli, J.L., Ackerman, D.L., McDermott, S., Edwards, J.G. (2012) Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: a systematic review of termination rates (1995-2011). Prenatal Diagnosis, 32(2): 142-153
|
|
|
Salvesen, K.Å., Øyen, L., Schmidt, N., Malt, U.F., Eik-Nes, S.H. (2002) Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9(2): 80-85
|
|
|
|
|