Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:0
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 6 from 28  
Back back to result list
2016, vol. 50, iss. 2, pp. 149-159
The importance of micro-structural approach and peace formations in dealing with socio-economic inequalities
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences

emailnemanja.dzuverovic@fpn.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: inequality; peace formations; conflict; micro-structural approach
Abstract
Increasingly, inequality is becoming one of the most important phenomena of our time. Recent protests (Spain, the UK, the U.S.), violent confrontations (Brazil, Israel) or even armed conflicts (India, Tunisia) are a direct consequence of polarization, which has increased significantly since the 1980s when the global dominance of neoliberal model was established. So far, mainstream one-fit-all (socio)economic solutions proved ineffective in tackling not only high levels of income inequality, but, more importantly, its multidimensional character visible in the prevalence of social exclusion (access to education, health, and social services, etc.) which is seriously constraining human capital and creating conflict potential among the 'have-nots'. In this context, diversity should be considered as a strength, although this contradicts the universality principle imposed by the liberal state and the neoliberal model, often by applying pressure, isolation or violent force. This is why micro-structural approach must emphasize the importance of local peace formations which, depending on the context, could be dramatically different but still achieve similar results in reducing deep rooted inequalities which are predominantly socially conditioned. It's only by 'going local' that the roots of contemporary inequality can be fully understood and 'prevention' (Burton) achieved.
References
*** (2014) 17 things we learned about income inequality in 2014. Atlantic, (online) (May 3 2015)
Auvinen, J., Nafziger, E. W. (1999) The Sources of Humanitarian Emergencies. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43(3): 267-290
Cornia, G.A. (2003) The Impact of Liberalisation and Globalisation on Within-country Income Inequality. CESifo Economic Studies, 49(4): 581-616
Cornia, G.A. (2004) Changes in the Distribution of Income over the Last Two Decades: Extent, Sources and Possible Causes. Rivista italiana degli economisti, 3: 349-388
Dada, C. (2015) The beatification of Oscar Romero. New Yorker, (online) (25 May 2015
Džuverović, N. (2014) Inequality–Conflict Research Beyond Neo-Liberal Discourse. Peace Review, 26(4): 547-555
Galtung, J. (1971) A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2): 81-117
Galtung, J. (1996) Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. Oslo: PRIO
Ginty, M.R., Firchow, P. (2014) Everyday peace indicators: Capturing local voices through surveys. Northern Ireland Community Relations Council, Shared Space: 18: 33-40
Ginty, R.M. (2014) Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6): 548-564
Ginty, R.M., Richmond, O.P. (2013) The Local Turn in Peace Building: a critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5): 763-783
Ginty, R.M. (2010) Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4): 391-412
Green, E. (2015) The pope tweeted that ‘Inequality is the root of social evil': Big deal?. Atlantic, (online). (22 May 2015)
Lindqvist, S. (1997) 'Exterminate All the Brutes': One Man's Odyssey into the Heart of Darkness and the Origins of European Genocide. New York: The New Press
Milanović, B. (2007) World apart: Measuring international and global inequality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Mohammed, A. (2015) The top 10 trends in 2015. (27 May 2015)
Murphy, C.N. (2001) Political Consequences of the New Inequality. International Studies Quarterly, 45(3): 347-356
Nafziger, E.W., Auvinen, J. (2002) Economic Development, Inequality, War, and State Violence. World Development, 30(2): 153-163
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Richmond, O.P. (2013) Peace Formation and Local Infrastructures for Peace. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(4): 271-287
Richmond, O.P. (2013) Failed statebuilding versus peace formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(3): 378-400
Robinson, W.I. (2004) A Theory of Global Capitalism: Transnational Production, Transnational Capitalists, and the Transnational State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
Rogers, P. (2010) Losing Control: Global Security in the Twenty-First Century. London: Pluto Press
Rostow, W.W. (1960) Stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. London: Cambridge University Press
Smoker, P. (1981) Small Peace. Journal of Peace Research, 18(2): 149-157
Stewart, F., Brown, G. (2007) Motivations for Conflict: Groups and Individuals. in: Crocker C.A., Hampson F.O., Aall P. [ed.] Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 219-245
Stewart, F. (2008) Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: An Introduction and some Hypotheses. in: Stewart F. [ed.] Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict. Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-23
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/socpreg1602149D
published in SCIndeks: 09/03/2017
Creative Commons License 4.0