- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:22
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:15
|
|
2023, vol. 36, br. 1, str. 21-32
|
Konstruktivizam kao savremena nastavna paradigma
Constructivism as a contemporary teaching paradigm
Univerzitet Crne Gore u Podgorici, Filozofski fakultet u Nikšiću, Nikšić, Crna Gora
e-adresa: niksi@t-com.me
Ključne reči: nastava; poučavanje; učenje; saznajni kontekst; tradicionalna i savremena konstruktivistička paradigma
Sažetak
U vaspitno-obrazovnom procesu zasnovanom na zakonitostima tradicionalnog razredno-predmetnog sistema suština nastave fokusirana je na poučavanje, zapamćivanje i reprodukciju sadržaja od strane učenika, u čijem je centru predavačko-verbalna aktivnost, ličnost i neprikosnoveni autoritet nastavnika. Za razliku od tog koncepta, u procesu fleksibilno organizovane nastave na konstruktivističkoj paradigmi, težište vaspitno-obrazovne aktivnosti pomjera se iz sfere poučavanja (pasivnog slušanja i memorisanja sadržaja) u polje aktivnog učenja, eksperimentisanjem, istraživanjem i otkrivanjem uzročno-posljedičnih veza i odnosa među proučavanim fenomenima, predmetima i pojavama. Ovdje se sveukupno saznanje zasniva na individualnoj percepciji, pamćenju, mišljenju, mašti, otkrivanju i logičkom zaključivanju učenika. To zapravo znači da je konstruktivistička nastava fokusirana na proces sticanja svrsishodnih znanja i vještina, usvajanje pozitivnih stavova, kulturnih vrijednosti i kompetencija, uz maksimalno korištenje i razvoj kognitivnih, afektivnih, psihomotornih i iskustvenih potencijala svakog pojedinca. Prema tome, cilj ovog rada jeste da se na temelju objektivnog sagledavanja suštine i kritičke deskripcije tradicionalnog koncepta, uz primjenu metode teorijske analize, elaboriraju saznajna ishodišta, mogućnosti, prednosti i ograničenja drugog, relativno savremenijeg koncepta, utemeljenog na konstruktivističkoj, odnosno kritičko-konstruktivističkoj didaktičkoj paradigmi.
Abstract
In the educational process based on the principles of the traditional class-subject system, the essence of teaching is focused on teaching and the memorization and reproduction of the content by students, while teacher's verbal activity, personality, and the unrivalled authority are in the center of this process. Contrary to this concept, in the process of teaching flexibly organized on the constructivist paradigm, the focus of educational activity shifts from the sphere of teaching (passive listening and memorizing content) to the field of active learning, experimenting, exploring, and discovering the cause and effect relations among the studied phenomena and objects. Knowledge is based on students' individual perception, memory, thinking, imagination, discovery, and logical reasoning. This actually means that constructivist teaching is focused on the process of acquiring meaningful knowledge and skills, adopting positive attitudes, cultural values and competencies, with the maximum use and development of each individual's cognitive, affective, psychomotor, and experiential potentials. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to put in focus the objective understanding and critical description of the traditional concept of teaching and learning by using the method of theoretical analysis. At the same time, the paper focuses on elaborating on cognitive starting points, possibilities, advantages, and limitations of a relatively modern concept based on constructivist, more precisely, critical constructivist didactic paradigm.
|
|
|
Reference
|
1
|
Bruner, J. (1996) The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
|
|
Chen, C. (2003) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching: Implications in Teaching. Computer Networking Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21 (2), 17-27
|
|
Dmitrijev, D.G. (2008) Konstruktivistički diskurs u teoriji sadržaja obrazovanja u SAD. Pedagogija, 63(3): 347-356
|
|
Džinkić, O., Milutinović, J. (2018) Ideje konstruktivizma u savremenoj školskoj praksi. Zbornik odseka za pedagogiju, 27 (18), 128-149
|
|
Ebrahimi, N.A. (2013) Constructivist Translation Classroom Enviroment Survey (CTLES). Development, Validation and Application, Translation & Interpreting, 5(2): 163-186
|
|
Fosnot, C.T., Perry, R.S. (2005) Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. u: Fosnot C. T. [ur.] Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice, NewYork, NY: Teacher College Press, 8-33
|
2
|
Jukić, R. (2013) Konstruktivizam kao poveznica poučavanja sadržaja prirodoznanstvenih i društvenih predmeta. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 10(2): 241-263
|
|
Kanslelaar, G., i dr. (2002) New technologies. u: Simons R. J.; van der Linden J.; Duffy T. [ur.] New learning, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 55-82
|
|
Kincheloe, J.L. (2008) Critical Constructivism Primer. New York: Peter Lang Publishing
|
|
Knežević-Florić, O. (2005) Pedagogija razvoja. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet
|
|
Loyens, S.M., Gijbels, D. (2008) Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments. Instructional Science, 36: 351-357
|
2
|
Mijanović, N. (2008) Subjekatska pozicija učenika u vaspitno-obrazovnom procesu između deklarativnog i stvarnog. Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu, vol. 21, br. 1, str. 13-22
|
4
|
Milutinović, J. (2016) Socijalni i kritički konstruktivizam u obrazovanju. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet
|
1
|
Milutinović, J. (2015) Kritički konstruktivizam - koncepcija i mogućnosti u oblasti obrazovanja. Nastava i vaspitanje, vol. 64, br. 3, str. 437-451
|
|
Murphy, E. (1997) Constructivism: From Philosophy to Practice. Education Resource Information Center ERIC, ED 444 966, Retrieved June 20, 2021., from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444966.pdf
|
1
|
Mušanović, M. (2000) Konstruktivistička teorija i obrazovni process. u: Kramar M. [ur.] Didaktični in metodični vidiki nadaljnega razvoja izobraževanja, Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru - Pedagoška fakulteta, 28-35, http://pedagogija.skretnica.com/pub/marko/MARIBOR%201999.doc
|
|
Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane, D.D. (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(82): 199-218
|
|
Palmer, D. (2005) A Motivational View of Constructivist: Informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15): 1853-1881
|
|
Perkins, D.N. (1992) Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?. u: Duffy M.; Jonassen D. H. [ur.] Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45-55
|
|
Ravitz, J.L., Becker, H.J., Wong, Y.T. (2000) Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and Practices among U.S. Teachers. University of California, Irvine - Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations
|
|
Richardson, V. (1997) Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. u: Richardson V. [ur.] Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings, Washington, DC: Falmer Press, 3-14
|
|
Richardson, V. (2003) Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9): 1623-1640
|
|
Schweiser, S. (2007) In history of ideas, constructivist pedagogy stems from German idealism. Electroneurobiologia, 15(4): 63-94
|
|
Stears, M. (2009) How social and critical constructivism can inform science curriculum design: A Study from South Africa. Educational Research, 51(4): 397-410
|
|
Topolovčan, T., I.Sar (2017) Konstruktivistička nastava. Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet
|
|
Vadeboncoeur, J. (1997) Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. u: Richardson V. [ur.] Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings, Washington, DC: Falmer Press, 15-37
|
12
|
Vigotski, L.S. (1974) Mišljenje i govor. Beograd: Nolit
|
1
|
von Glasersfeld, E. (2003) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Routledge Publication
|
|
|
|