Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:0
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0
article: 4 from 49  
Back back to result list
2018, iss. 161, pp. 305-316
article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
published on: 01/02/2019
doi: 10.5937/kultura1861305Z
Art, nature, science, craft, technique
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Departmant of Philosophy


The author discusses the possibility of defining the concept of art. Using classical types of definition is rejected as it is impossible to unambiguously determine the diferentia specifica of art in relation to other human practices. Instead, the author suggests a different approach to this problem which is reflected in the examination of the differences between art, on the one hand, and nature, science, crafts and technique, on the other. While examining the relation between art and these other forms of human practices, the author also points out the most important historical transformations of the concept of art. Finally, the author concludes that, in the effort to define a modern concept of art, it is necessary to clear this concept of the inherited assumptions and prejudices that can distort its true meaning.



Bayer, R. Traité d'esthétique
Lalo, C. (1939) L'Art loin de la vie. Paris
Souriau, E. L'Avenir de l'esthétique